MeCP2 Binding to DNA Depends upon Hydration at Methyl-CpG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Structural Mechanisms of Nucleosome Recognition by Linker Histones
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Fernando Corrêa, Jason Key, Brian Kuhlman, Kevin H. Gardner  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
DNA Minor Groove Sensing and Widening by the CCAAT-Binding Complex
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Suppression of DNA-Mediated Charge Transport by BamHI Binding
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Presentation transcript:

MeCP2 Binding to DNA Depends upon Hydration at Methyl-CpG Kok Lian Ho, Iain W. McNae, Lars Schmiedeberg, Robert J. Klose, Adrian P. Bird, Malcolm D. Walkinshaw  Molecular Cell  Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 525-531 (February 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.028 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence Comparison of Methyl-CpG-Binding Domains of the MBD Protein Family from Human, Mouse, and Xenopus Secondary structure elements from the X-ray structure of MeCP2 are denoted by arrows (β strand) and coils (α helix). Mutations that have been associated with neurological disease are shown. Human (H), mouse (M), and Xenopus (X). Molecular Cell 2008 29, 525-531DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.028) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The X-Ray Structure of MeCP2-MBD Complexed with BDNF Promoter DNA at 2.5 Å (A) BDNF promoter DNA sequence used in the cocrystal X-ray structure. The overhanging T/A bases were incorporated to promote crystallization through end-to-end DNA stacking. (B) The X-ray structure of the MeCP2-MBD in complex with DNA. The methyl groups of the mCpG pair are shown as spheres. The β strands (green) and α helix (blue) are connected by the loops L1 (R111– K119), L2 (N126–K130), and L3 (R133–S134). The tandem Asx-ST motif (D156–R162) is highlighted in red. (C) Overlay of the unliganded MeCP2 structure determined by NMR (gray) with the X-ray structure (blue and red) in complex with DNA (yellow). The Asx-ST-motif of the X-ray structure is highlighted in red. (D) Nonbonded contacts to the m5C methyl groups. Black dashed lines show all nonbonded contacts to the m5C methyl groups of less than 4 Å. The m5C methyl groups are shown as yellow balls and water molecules W21, W22, and W24 as purple balls. Distances for all seven m5C methyl CH…O contacts are shown. A complete list of distances for these interactions is given in Table S1. (E) Hydrogen-bonding interactions involving the mCpG pair. Hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The two m5C methyl…water contacts are drawn as dashed red lines. Distances for all hydrogen bonds shown in this figure are tabulated in Table S2. Specific hydrogen bonds formed between R111 and G9 (chain B) and R133 and G34 (chain C) position the guanidinium groups directly over the methyl groups of the m5C bases. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 525-531DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.028) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mutagenesis Confirms the Importance of Y123 and T158 for MBD Binding to Methylated DNA In Vitro (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with the 20 bp BDNF DNA sequence as probe in the presence of wild-type (WT) or mutant forms of the 77–167 fragment of MeCP2. The first lane (WT+Me−) shows absence of a protein DNA complex between wild-type MBD and nonmethylated DNA. Binding to methylated DNA is disrupted by T158M and T158A mutations, whereas binding is minimally affected by the conservative T158S mutation. The Y123F mutation significantly reduces DNA binding. (B) A plot of the fraction of labeled probe complexed at protein concentrations of 250 nM, 500 nM, 750 nM, and 1 μM as measured by densitometry. Estimated standard deviations (shown as vertical bars) were calculated from measured intensities from three separate gels and scaled to the band from the probe complexed with 1 μM wild-type MBD, which was taken as 100%. Plots refer to WT (black), T158A (blue), T158M (yellow), T158S (green, from two measurements), and Y123F (red). Molecular Cell 2008 29, 525-531DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.028) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 T158 Plays a Structurally Important Role in Forming the Tandem Asx-ST Motif The Asx turn is composed of D156, F157, and T158, with the motif-defining hydrogen bond formed between the carboxylate side chain and the main-chain amine nitrogen of T158. The ST motif is the modified β turn consisting of T158, V159, T160, G161, and R162 with the side-chain hydroxyl group of T158 hydrogen bonding to the main-chain nitrogen atoms of G161 and R162. Molecular Cell 2008 29, 525-531DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.028) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions