The WTO-Ministerial Decisions at Nairobi (MC 10)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE: LEGAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Advertisements

Hamid Dom Reg WS March 04 1 INTRODUCTION THE GATS and DOMESTIC REGULATION.
State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note:
The Multilateral Trading System: Opportunities and Challenges for the East African Community (EAC) Countries Anne Kamau Ministry of Trade Department of.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION ON SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MULTILATERAL DISCIPLINES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD.
Agriculture Negotiations in the WTO Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi WTO Cell, IIFT.
INDIA AND THE WTO IN THE CONTEXT OF AGRICULTURE
Origins of WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) –Established in 1947 as a forum to reduce trade barriers WTO replaced GATT in 1995 as legal.
Subsidies in Agriculture – are they good/bad? MERC SEMINAR 10 September 2009 By Bonani Nyhodo (NAMC)
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
1 UNCTAD Virtual Institute Study Tour Course on Economics of Commodity Production and Trade Agriculture and the WTO Geneva, February 2010 United Nations.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
Training session - Vietnamese agriculture and WTO - Hanoi - sept The notifications of Viet Nam.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement Lecture 24. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT and EXPORT CREDITS UPDATE
TRIMS - Trade Related Investment Measures
Impact of WTO on Indian Agriculture
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
Training session - Vietnamese agriculture and WTO - Hanoi - sept The on-going negotiations.
1 Nepal’s WTO Membership and the Agriculture Sector Navin Dahal South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment.
IPC Seminar Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round MARCELO REGUNAGA Hanoi – October 2005.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
UNCTAD 1 OVERVIEW OF THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED BY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD
1 Overview of the Doha Work Programme Implications for the Developing Countries Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTADWWW.UNCTAD.ORG/COMMDIP December 2001.
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES S&DT SMALL ECONOMIES ENHANCED INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK AID FOR TRADE.
The Doha Development Agenda: Progress Or Process? Parr Rosson Professor & Director Center for North American Studies Department of Agricultural Economics.
ACHIEVING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH AGRICULTURAL TRADE What do Developing Countries Need From Trade Negotiations? By Percy W. Misika 29 February.
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
- Existing Multilateral Disciplines on Trade in Services First agreement of multilateral and legally-enforceable rules aimed at the liberalisation of trade.
The Potential Impacts of Changes in Export Competition Policies.
Brown Bag Seminar The Current State of the Agricultural Trade Negotiations in the WTO Tuesday, September 16, 2003.
Brazil’s Challenge to the U.S. Cotton Subsidies
Ag Policy, Lecture 6 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 5 World Trade Organization Review.
1 Competition policy in WTO sectoral agreements Dr. Pierre Arhel Counsellor (competition policy) Intellectual Property Division Sao Paulo, April.
An Assessment of Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT) in SAFTA Presented at Regional Seminar on Economic Cooperation in South Asia Organized by CUTS.
Expectations from LDCs WTO 10 th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Gains & Losses for India Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International Jaipur, India
Update on Multilateral Trade Negotiations “The July Package” PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 09 November 2004.
Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round A European Perspective Dr Rolf Moehler.
Package of agreements annexed to the WTO Agreement
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement
The 2007 Farm Bill: More of the Same or a New Path?
Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Activities in SADC
SPECIAL JOURNAL CLUB 20TH OF JULY 2005
WTO Workshop On “Agriculture Notifications” September, 2009 Geneva, Switzerland. Presentation By Pakistan.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE & INDUSTRY Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO)
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and the WTO negotiations
EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD)
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
The WTO-TBT-Agreement
The WTO-Agreement on Agriculture
The WTO Agreement on Safeguards
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
„The WTO-Anti-Dumping Agreement“
The WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)
The WTO-Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs)
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Trade in Services Negotiations: Scheduling techniques
Main S+D Provisions of the WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Agriculture in the July Framework
The WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Presentation transcript:

The WTO-Ministerial Decisions at Nairobi (MC 10) and the Agreement on Agriculture Achim Seiler, Trade Consultant and Capacity Building Specialist, Kathmandu EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD) TPSD is implemented by in cooperation with and

1. The Decisions The Nairobi Package contains a series of six Ministerial Decisions on agriculture, cotton and issues related to least-developed Countries: Commitment to abolish export subsidies for farm exports Decision on public stockholding for food security purposes A special safeguard mechanism for developing countries Measures related to cotton Decision on preferential treatment for LDCs in the area of services Criteria for determining whether exports from LDCs may benefit form trade preferences

2: Background - The Agreement on Agriculture Market Access (Art. 4 and 5) Domestic Support (Art. 6 and 7) Export Subsidies (Art. 8-11) The Country Schedules

3: Background: Market Access Tariffication Tariff-Reductions Minimum Market Access Special Safeguards Provisions Special Treatment

4: Domestic Support Amber Box (Art.6) Blue Box (Art. 6.5) Green Box (Annex II)

5: Domestic Support Peace Clause Coupled-up Coupled-down De-coupled De minimis Peace Clause

6: Reduction Commitments Exemptions: Green Box Blue Box Developmental measures De minimis

7: Green Box Government service programs e.g.: general services; public stockholding programs for food security purposes and domestic food aid; research; pest and disease-control programs; agricultural training services and extension and advisory services; inspection services; marketing and promotion services; infrastructural services; including electricity reticulation; roads and other means of transport, etc.) Direct payments to producers (decoupled from production, prices or factors of production)

8: Blue Box Direct payments under production limiting programs 5 a) Direct payments under production-limiting programs shall not be subject to the commitment to reduce domestic support if: Such payments are based on fixed area or yields, or Such payments are made on 85 per cent or less of the base level of production; or Livestock payments are made on a fixed number of head. b) The exemption from the reduction commitment for direct payments meeting the above criteria shall be reflected by the exclusion of the value of those direct payments in a Member’s calculation of its Current Total AMS”

9: Developmental Measures “...investment subsidies which are generally available to agriculture in developing country Members and agricultural input subsidies generally available to low-income or resource-poor producers in developing country Members shall be exempt from domestic support reduction commitments that would otherwise be applicable to such measures, as shall domestic support to producers in developing country Members to encourage diversification from growing illicit narcotic crops. Domestic support meeting the criteria of this paragraph shall not be required to be included in a Member’s calculation of its Current Total AMS. (Art. 6.2)

11: De minimis All domestic support measures in favor of agricultural producers that do not fit into any of the above exempt categories are subject to reduction commitments. However, under the de minimis provisions of the Agreement there is no requirement to reduce such trade-distorting domestic support in any year, in which the aggregate value of the product-specific support does not exceed 5 per cent of the total value of production of the agricultural product in question. In addition, non-product specific support which is less than 5 per cent of the value of total agricultural production is also exempt from reduction. The 5 per cent threshold applies to developed countries whereas in the case of developing countries the de minimis ceiling is 10 per cent.

12: Government Support to Agriculture in the US and the EU Million Euro/$US EU 25 (2005/06) EU27 (2013) USA (2005) (2012) Upper limit AMS 67.159 72.378 19.103 AMS 28.427 5.899 12.937 6.863 Blue Box 13.455 2.754 ------- De minimis 1.250 1.780 117 4.962 Overall Total Domestic Support 43.123 10.433 13.055 11.825 Green Box 40.280 71.140 71.829 127.441 AMS = Aggregated Measurement of Support

13: Government Support to Agriculture in India and China Million $US India (2004/05) (2010/11) China (2005) (2010) Upper limit AMS Art. 6.2 10.689 31.610 Blue Box 13.455 De minimis 1.5 2.282 576 1.800 Green Box 6.183 24.520 3.800 7.800 AMS = Aggregated Measurement of Support

14: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Members reaffirm their commitment (...) to exercise utmost restraint with regard to any recourse to all forms of subsidies and all export measures with equivalent effect (Art. 1) The regular sessions of the Committee on Agriculture shall review every three years the disciplines contained in this Decision, with the aim of enhancing disciplines to ensure that no circumvention threatens export subsidy elimination commitments and to prevent non-commercial transactions from being used to circumvent such commitments (Art. 5)

15: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Developed Members shall immediately eliminate their remaining scheduled export subsidy entitlements as of the date od adoption of this Decision (Art. 6, exceptions in the footnote) Developing country Members shall eliminate their export subsidy entitlements by the end of 2018 (Art. 7, exceptions in the footnote)

16: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Developing country Members shall continue to benefit from the provisions of Art. 9.4 of the Agreement on Agriculture until the end of 2023, i.e. five years after the end-date for elimination of all forms of export subsidies. Least developed countries and net-food importing countries listed in G/AG/5/Rev.10 shall continue to benefit from the provisions of Article 9.4 of the Agreement on Agriculture until the end of 2030 (Art. 8)

17: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Agreement on Agriculture, Art. 9.4: During the implementation period, developing country Members shall not be required to undertake commitments in respect of the export subsidies listed in subparagraphs (d) and (e) of paragraph 1 above, provided that these are not applied in a manner that would circumvent reduction commitments

18: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Agreement on Agriculture, subparagraphs (d) and (e) of paragraph 1 d) the provision of subsidies to reduce the costs of marketing exports of agricultural products (other than widely available export promotion and advisory services) including handling, upgrading and other processing costs, and the costs of international transport and freight; (e) internal transport and freight charges on export shipments, provided or mandated by governments, on terms more favourable than for domestic shipments

19: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Elimination : Developed Members, (Art. 6) Exception: Developed Members, Footnote 3 Elimination: Developing country Members, (Art. 7) Exception: Developed Members, Footnote 4 1 Jan/2016 30 Sept 2017 30 Dec 2018 30 Dec 2020

20: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Subsidies Exception: Elimination : Developing country Members, Footnote 5 Extension of AoA Art. 9.4 in favor of Developing country Members (Art. 8) Extension of AoA Art. 9.4 in favor of LDCs (Art. 8) 30 Dec 2022 30 Dec 2023 30 Dec 2030

21: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Cotton With regard to cotton, the disciplines and commitments contained In this Decision shall be immediately implemented as of the date of adoption of this Decision by developed country Members, and not later than January 2017 by developing country Members (Art. 12)

22: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Credits, Export Credit Guarantees or Insurance Programs In addition to complying with all other subsidy obligations under the Agreement on Agriculture and any other covered Agreements, Members undertake not to provide export credits, export credit guarantees or insurance programs for exports of products listed in Annex 1 of the Agreement on Agriculture (…) other than in conformity with this Decision.

23: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Export Credits, Export Credit Guarantees or Insurance Programs These export credits, export credit guarantees and insurance programs comprise: direct financing support, risk cover government-to-government credit arrangements any other form of governmental export credit support (Art. 13)

24: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Special and Differential Treatment Maximum repayment terms: the developing country Members concerned shall have a phase-in period of four years after the first day of the implementation period (footnote 9: 2016-2020) by the end of which to fully implement the maximum repayment term of 18 months (Art. 16)

25: The Ministerial Decision on Export Competition Special and Differential Treatment …least-developed and net-food importing developing countries shall be accorded differential and more favorable treatment comprising allowance for a repayment term in respect of them of between 36 and 54 months, for the acquisition of basic foodstuffs. Should one of these Members face exceptional circumstances which still preclude financing normal levels of commercial imports of basic foodstuffs and/or in accessing loans granted by multilateral and/or regional financial institutions within these timeframes, it shall have an extension of such a time-frame. The standard monitoring and surveillance provisions, as resulting from this Decision, shall apply to these cases (Art. 17)

Seiler.achim@yahoo.de