Wednesday Summary of Working Group I

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Summary of Session 1: Optics and Layout P. Raimondi.
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Sectors
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
E. Todesco DESIGN STUDY FOR THE LHC UPGRADE WP3: MAGNETS E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Thanks to O. Bruning, G. De Rijk, T. Nakamoto, J. M. Rifflet,
ATLAS muon endcap 1 layer of tracking chambers (MDT) 3 layers of trigger chambers (TGC) which we are working on ATLAS TGC installation and commissioning.
Beam Commissioning Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Engineering Issues.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Review of Quench Limits FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab 1 st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting CERN November 16-18, 2011.
General Considerations for the Upgrade of the LHC Insertion Magnets
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Superconducting Quadrupoles inside the HERA Experiments M. Bieler, DESY, LHC LUMI 05 Workshop, Arcidosso, September The HERA Interaction Region.
Optimizing IR Design for LHC Luminosity Upgrade Peter McIntyre and Akhdiyor Sattarov Texas A&M University.
Experimental Sectors Ray Veness / AT-VAC With many thanks to G.Foffano + W.Cameron TS/MME Patrick Lepeule / AT-VAC.
Thursday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions I: LHC LUMI 2005; ; ArcidossoOliver Brüning 1.
Summary of Opening Session Emmanuel Tsesmelis / CERN CARE-HHH-APD Workshop Arcidosso 2 September 2005.
Open Midplane Dipole (OMD) Design for Dipole First Layout R. Gupta (BNL), N. Mokhov (FANL) bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
LHC Interaction Region Upgrades and the Machine- Experiment Interface Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CARE-HHH-APD Mini-Workshop IR'07 Frascati 8 November.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
AT-VAC SPC Nicolaas KOS Beam Screens for Inner Triplet Magnets LHC Upgrade Phase 1 Nicolaas KOS  LHC Upgrade phase 1  Inner triplet BS Requirements.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Energy Deposition Issues in LHC IR Upgrades LHC IR Upgrades Workshop Pheasant Run, St. Charles, IL October 3-4, 2005 Fermilab LHC IR 2005 Nikolai Mokhov,
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
31/07/08Review new IRs: Energy Deposition1 Energy Deposition in the New IRs Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
14 Aug. 08DOE Review John Huth Future Harvard ATLAS Plans John Huth.
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
Turnaround time in modern hadron colliders & store-length optimization
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
D0 and its integrability
LHeC interaction region
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Systems
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Upgrade Strategy for the Experimental Vacuum Systems
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
Beam-Induced Energy Deposition Studies in IR Magnets
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
1st HiLumi LHC / LARP Collaboration Meeting 2011 Nov 17th
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
IR Magnet Layout/Design - JLEIC
Thursday Summary of Working Group I
Possible Quadrupole-first Options with beta* <= 0.25 m
Review of Quench Limits
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
IR Magnet Design and Engineering Considerations
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Presentation transcript:

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions I: LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 1

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I Initial questions II: LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 2

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Tanaji Sen’s presentation I: -peak power deposition inside the triplet magnets is a factor 3 to 4 above the quench limit of the triplet magnets  any IR upgrade scenario requires an upgrade of the TAS absorber  TAS length and material? -peak power deposition inside the triplet magnets leaves a safety factor 4 for the quench limit (including 3mm orbit errors) for nominal operation  how does the peak power deposition inside the triplet magnets scale with the orbit tolerances and how much can we increase the safety factor for the peak power deposition wih reduced tolerances on the closed orbit errors? LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 3

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Tanaji Sen’s presentation II: -two options for dealing with the increased heat load inside the triplet magnets: 1) construct more robust triplet magnets that can tolerate the increased peak heat load: how does the quench limit of different super conducting materials vary and are there SC materials that provide higher tolerances on the peak power deposition inside the magnets? LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 4

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Tanaji Sen’s presentation III: -two options for dealing with the increased heat load inside the triplet magnets: 2) reduce the peak heat load with an upgrade of the TAS absorber: how does the peak power deposition scale with the magnetic field strength and aperture of the magnets? magnetic TAS: requires integrated field of 10 Tm <-> 20 Tm LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 5

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Tanaji Sen’s presentation IV: -peak power deposition inside the triplet magnets depends on the material of the vacuum chamber on the orbit tolerances  scaling? LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 6

Inner Triplet - baseline Azimuthally averaged power density isocontours (mW/g) in the inner triplet of IR5

Peak power density - baseline Peak power density in the first 2 radial bins for the baseline beam tube in Q1 and an alternative thinner tube.

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Peter McIntyres’s presentation I: -power density deposited inside the triplet magnets reduces with L* if the triplet aperture is kept constant  move triplet magnets closer to the IP (scaling of losses with magnet field?) -power deposition inside the triplet magnets increases with L* with one assumes the magnet diameter is proportional to L*  move the triplet magnets further away from the IP -discussion showed that it is still a good idea to reduce L* but assumption of constant aperture must be revised LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 9

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Fabrizio Palla’s presentation I: -CMS detector might offer potential magnet locations for L* = 14 m with radial space of +/- 0.5 m (currently occupied by TOTEM and CASTOR) -ECAL installation is region of high radiation (L* = 3 m) -evaluate pro & con of a fixed installation (compatibility with access and vacuum bake out) and a movable installation (tolerances for magnet and detector movements) LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 10

Muon chambers Need better shielding of YE/4 (likely to be done before SLHC proper) Need better shielding for ME/1

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Fabrizio Palla’s presentation II: -the situation for ATLAS is not as obvious (active area of the detector extends beyond TAS absorber)  we might have to look for different IR layout solutions for the two main experiments -the time required for an upgrade shut down must be balanced against a gain in integrated luminotisy  see the talk by Michael Bieler LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 12

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Michael Bieler’s presentation I: -HERA luminosity upgrade features 6 new superconducting magnets inside the detectors (2m and 3.7m long) -main problems related to the new installation: water condenses on the cold magnets and drips into the detector magnets are supported by steel cables and move by up to 1mm during the ramp BPMs in the IR regions were initially exposed to synchtoron radiation LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 13

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I main points from Michael Bieler’s presentation II: -commissioning time for the HERA luminosity upgrade of 1.5 years to 2 years  the LHC IR upgrade must be robust in order to allow a fast commissioning time! LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 14

ZEUS Detektor p e Zentrale Driftkammer Mikrovertex-Detektor CTD Vorwärts-Kalorimeter Rückwärts-Kalorimeter Zentrales-Kalorimeter Solenoid Magnet Zentrale Driftkammer CTD Mikrovertex-Detektor

Wednesday Summary of Working Group I -not all questions could be answered but interests and worries have been communicated to all parties involved -many new questions -interest in scaling laws and concrete layout models for comparative studies -reduced L* is not excluded from the experiment (CMS) point of view -complicated IR designs that might imply a long commissioning time! LHC LUMI 2005; 1.9.2005; Arcidosso Oliver Brüning 16