Critical Thinking Lecture 13a Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights
Advertisements

A Defense of Abortion Judith Jarvis Thomson. Judith Jarvis Thomson American Moral philosopher Born in 1929 Attended Columbia University.
CATHOLIC VIEWS ON ABORTION
Analogy Figurative and Argumentative. General Characteristics Analogy compares items via certain key similarities in order to: Analogy compares items.
Judith Jarvis Thomson “A Defense of Abortion” (1971)
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 17 Warren on Abortion
Abortion Opposing arguments (esp. Don Marquis)
Abortion. Rights-based Arguments Rights-based Pro-life Argument G A fetus is a person G A person has a right to life G So, a fetus has a right to life.
1 Abortion I I. 2 Some Background 1 st Mo.2 nd Mo.3 rd Mo.4 th Mo.5 th Mo.6 th Mo.7 th Mo.8 th Mo.9 th Mo. Conception “Zygote” “Embryo” “Fetus”
Reasoning about Abortion Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
Thesis Statement You are killing another human being, you are only thinking of yourself, and there is no reason why anyone should have an abortion; are.
1 Is Abortion Wrong? II. 2 Thomson’s Project Thomson grants for the sake of argument the premise that a fertilized egg is a person. Thomson challenges.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 22 Active & Passive Euthanasia
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 16 Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion By David Kelsey.
DEFENDING LIFE: PRO-LIFE APOLOGETICS 101. COURSE AGENDA 9am – 10:00am: Clarifying & Establishing a Foundation for the Abortion Debate. 10:00am – 11:00am:
Abortion summary. the first argument by analogy 1. It isn’t wrong for you to disconnect the famous violinist. 2. The case involving you and the famous.
Contraception and Abortion. standard arguments Conservative CP1) Fetus is a person. CC) Abortion is morally wrong. Liberal LP1) Fetus is not a person.
An Introduction to Ethics
Parental Rights: Father’s Rights in Abortion
The Abortion Debate.
Answering Pro-Choice Rhetoric: Five Bad Ways to Argue for Abortion
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights By David Kelsey.
Warren and Thomson on Abortion Liberal and Moderate Views.
Thomson on Abortion. Two old arguments All human beings have a right to life The fetus is clearly human Therefore the fetus has a right to life and abortion.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.
A Defense of Abortion. Opening Remarks The debate over the moral permissibility of abortion usually focuses on whether or not the fetus is a person. Thomson.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
Abortion: Conflicting Rights
“A Defense of Abortion”
Abortion. The Central Argument 1.The fetus is a person. 2.If (1), the fetus has a prima facie right to life. 3.If the fetus has a prima facie right to.
1 The Morality of Abortion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Abortion Part III Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. Judith Thomson, “A Defense of Abortion” A defense of abortion that grants that the fetus is a person with.
 Module blog ❊ ubphi107.wordpress.com ❊ Look for: Syllabus Slides for week 1 tue Deadlines  Blog comments ❊ Constant name  After-class discussions.
By: Judith Jarvis Thomson Presented by: Ashley Baxter.
“the premature exit of the foetus from the womb”
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies By David Kelsey.
Abortion Rae, Moral Choices, ch. 5. Legal Background Roe v. Wade (1973) –A woman has a constitutional right to an abortion. Abortion “on demand” during.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 21 Active & Passive Euthanasia By David Kelsey.
Violinists and People Seeds
9.1 Analogical Reasoning Analogical reasoning may be understood as a subtype of inductive reasoning.
Abortion as a Contemporary Moral Issue
5 Arguments and responses
Let’s Talk about…Sex.
Parental Rights: Father’s Rights in Abortion
The Reading Titus 1:5-6 Question: If the Bible says “children”, then I don’t agree to select an appoint an ‘elder’ that has only one child! What.
Abortion.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson)
Critical Thinking Lecture 5b Fallacies in Reasoning (2)
Introduction to Logic Lecture 5b More Fallacies
What is the destruction of an embryo like?
Responding to Emergencies
Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2009
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
The Problem of Evil An Ethical Argument Against the Existence of God, and the Defense from that Argument.
Warren on Abortion Feb. 27 and Mar. 1 Warren on Abortion Ethics 1.
Lecture 05: A Brief Summary
LO: To explore the rights of those involved in the pregnancy
The Ethics of Abortion When, if ever, is Abortion morally permissible?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3a Evaluating an argument
The abortion debate arises from the conflict between two basic rights: the fetus’ right to life and the mother’s right over her own body. The pro-life.
Abortion.
“A Defense of Abortion”
Why Abortion Is Immoral
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1 (Intro.)
Abortion Little, The Morality of Abortion
Speciesism and the Idea of Equality
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking Lecture 13a Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion By David Kelsey

The most common argument for the impermissibility of abortion The main argument strategy for the impermissibility of abortion: 1-A fetus is a person 2-Every person has a right to life 3-A fetus has a right to life (from 1 & 2) 4-A woman has a right to decide what happens in and to her body 5-The fetus’ right to life trumps the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body. 6-Abortion is impermissible. Where would you challenge this argument?

Thomson rejects premise 5 In response to the argument from the previous slide: Most folks try to argue that premise 1 is false. Thomson tries a different tact: Which premise does she go after? Thomson argues that the scope of the right to life of the fetus doesn’t include the right to the use of the expectant mother’s body Thus, the mother’s right to control what happens in & to her body cannot be trumped by ____________________. What kind of argument does Thomson make?

The Violinist Analogy The Violinist analogy is supposed to be analogous to a case in which a woman becomes pregnant as a result of rape. The terms of the analogy: The violinist is analogous to ___________. The kidnap victim is analogous to ___________. The kidnapping is analogous to the ___________. Unplugging from the violinist is analogous to ______________. Question: Would you unplug from the Violinist? If so you must also accept what?

The Tiny House This case is analogous to one in which pregnancy will result in the death of the mother. Terms of the analogy: The rapidly growing child is analogous to __________. The mother trapped in the house is analogous to _____________. Killing the rapidly growing child is analogous to ___________. If your intuition is that the mother has the right to defend her life against the rapidly growing child, you must admit what?

People Seeds The People seeds case is supposed to be analogous to a case in which a pregnancy resulted although some form of protection was used. Terms of the analogy: The people seeds are analogous to _________. The person plant is analogous to __________. The house is supposed to be analogous to ___________. The fine mesh screen is analogous to _____________. Thomson thinks the person plant that finds it’s way through the screen and develops doesn’t have a right to the use of your house. So according to Thomson, a fetus that results from the use of protection has no right to the use of what?

Minimally decent Samaritans For Thomson, it’s not that she thinks that any old reason for having an abortion will justify getting the abortion. If it is a mere inconvenience for the woman to get the abortion, then it would be indecent of her to do so. Question: what if pregnancy lasted only an hour? So Thomson thinks the mother must be at least a __________________. The case of Kitty Genovese!

Objections to Thomson: The Weirdness objection Thomson’s Violinist case and the others are too dissimilar to the different cases of abortion because Thomson’s cases are all too weird. The reply: Questionable relevance

The Tacit Consent Objection What does Thomson say about consensual sex? What if the expecting parents wanted to have a child all along and then something came up? What if they changed their minds? Thomson’s response: If it isn’t too much of an inconvenience on the mother to have the child then she ought to. If it is too much of a burden on the mother then abortion is permissible because, after all, consent can be withdrawn.

The Responsibility objection You have a responsibility to care for the fetus in all cases except rape whereas in Thomson’s analogies, for example the people seeds analogy, you have no such responsibility. Reply: But does this added responsibility widen the scope of the fetus’ right to life?

The Killing vs. Letting Die objection Killing and letting die: The Violinist case is a case of letting the violinist die. Abortion is killing. Question: Is killing worse than letting die? Response: The killing and letting die distinction does no work because Thomson is worried only about what?

The Stranger vs. Offspring Objection The objection: The violinist is a stranger The mother child relationship is special though. It is this relationship which obligates the mother to bring the child to term. Response: What’s the relevance of this objection?