Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPICE Mie [mi:] Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison. Updates to ppc and spice PPC: Randomized the simulation based on system time (with us resolution) Added the.
Advertisements

Calibration of NT200+ with the external Laser Antipin Konstantin MEPhI (Moscow) Zeuthen,
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
H Yepes, C Bigongiari, J Zuñiga, JdD Zornoza IFIC (CSIC - Universidad de Valencia) NEWS ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES COLLABORATION.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Phun with Photonics Phun with Photonics Berkeley IceCube Collaboration Meeting Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley March 20, 2005.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
PD Kobe Univ. 06/29/2007 General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results I am Mina Inaba from Chiba university. I will.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration.
IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: “DOM MB to Event Builder”
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
Time calibration IceCube reconstruction workshop UMD, November 2004 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
String-18 New-DAQ Commissioning Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2002.
Erik Blaufuss University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Cascade and Flasher Workshop Welcome! n Logistics n Agenda n Goals Spencer Klein, LBNL.
J. Vandenbroucke N. Bramall, M.D’Agostino, A. Morey, P. Sandstrom, M.Solarz, I.Taboada Calibration of the Standard Candle: How Standard Is It? IceCube.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Laguna Beach, CA March 2003 String-18 Progress and Plans.
IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.
Attenuation measurement with all 4 frozen-in SPATS strings Justin Vandenbroucke Freija Descamps IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands September.
Hagar Landsman, Mike Richman, and Kara Hoffman On behalf of the IceCube Collaboration Ice index of refraction n(z) Ice Attenuation Length (point to point)
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Feature Extraction IceCube Collaboration meeting in Berkeley, March 2005 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.
Calibrations Accomplishments in PY03 Plans for PY04 Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 lead – Detector Characterization.
Feature Extractor: overview and history of recent changes Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison Goal: Given an ATWD or FADC waveform, determine arrival times of some.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
An Interactive session lxplus> athena.py –i AnalysisSkeleton_jobOptions.py –l FATAL athena> include ("PyAnalysisCore/InitPyAnalysisCore.py") athena> theApp.initialize()
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
INFN-Pisa Collaboration Meeting, Roma – 12/10/2013 *
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Update on the GRB Triggered Shower Analysis
Nanobeacon Calibration in DU2
Doug Cowen/High-Level Analysis Preparation/SAC Meeting
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
White Rabbit in KM3NeT Mieke Bouwhuis NIKHEF 9th White Rabbit Workshop
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
South Pole Ice (SPICE) model
New Discriminator Board Test
String 21 Flashers and AMANDA
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Time resolution measurement with Madison test-DAQ
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Time calibration Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL UC Berkeley, November 2004.
Ice Investigation with PPC
String-21 Flasher Analysis

Experimental setup (SPICE)
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
Tau Neutrinos in IceCube
Chris Crawford Blast Analysis Meeting 2004/09/24
Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.
Presentation transcript:

Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley Baton Rouge Collaboration Meeting April 9, 2006

Outline method for obtaining timing and geometry from flashers specifics of the available data first results from 9 string IceCube

{ Method for each DOM, flash all 12 LED’s at full brightness look at the first photons seen by the module just above that DOM (the target) the mean of the first hit distribution gives an indication of the spacing the width of the first hit distribution gives an indication of the timing resolution { 17 m (usually)

Method Specifics waveforms in the target DOM have hundreds of PE’s use Dima’s Feature Extractor to get the leading edge of the waveform feature-extracted leading edge

Method Specifics also need to obtain the time the flasher went off to do absolute geometry and timing current pulse into the LED’s is digitized and sent up in ATWD channel 3 get the leading edge time of this current pulse the algorithm for doing this was the source of the discrepancy between the Fat Reader and standard IceTray analyses; fixed now the module that does all the analysis and outputs histograms and ntuples is called flasher-timing in the IceVer meta-project

Method Specifics Leading Edge Times leading edge distributions are very well fit by Gaussians Time [ns]

Errors and Offsets each leading edge distribution has ~4000 entries the errors on the mean as reported by the fitter are typically ~.01 ns means are offset from the direct travel time a systematic of the Feature Extraction or the flash time extraction? delay between digitized current pulse and the actual flash hole ice?

Available Data runs are tagged INITVER flasher is run at full brightness with pulse width 20 ns at 19 Hz data for all 9 strings processed (not all the DOM’s on all of the strings yet)

String 21 Geometry 19 m 15 m 77 ns

String 21 Timing ice properties?

String 29 Geometry 16 m, 18 m spacing alteration clearly visible!!

String 29 Timing

String 30 Geometry

String 30 Timing

String 38 Geometry

String 38 Timing

String 39 Geometry

String 39 Timing

String 40 Geometry

String 40 Timing

String 49 Geometry

String 49 Timing

String 50 Geometry

String 50 Timing

String 59 Geometry

String 59 Timing

Future Work