Hydrogen Atom Review of Quantum Mechanics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Mechanics Discussion. Quantum Mechanics: The Schrödinger Equation (time independent)! Hψ = Eψ A differential (operator) eigenvalue equation H.
Advertisements

Exam Study Practice Do all the reading assignments. Be able to solve all the homework problems without your notes. Re-do the derivations we did in class.
Lecture #3 OUTLINE Band gap energy Density of states Doping Read: Chapter 2 (Section 2.3)
Lecture Jan 31,2011 Winter 2011 ECE 162B Fundamentals of Solid State Physics Band Theory and Semiconductor Properties Prof. Steven DenBaars ECE and Materials.
Lecture 2 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d) – Energy band model – Band gap energy – Density of states – Doping Reading: Pierret , 3.1.5;
Lecture 2 OUTLINE Important quantities Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d) – Energy band model – Band gap energy – Density of states – Doping Reading:
The Ig Nobel Prizes are  “Booby Prizes”!
Impurities & Defects, Continued More on Shallow Donors & Acceptors Amusing Answers to Exam Questions Given by Public School Students!
Note! The following is excerpted from a lecture found on-line. The original author is Professor Peter Y. Yu Department of Physics University of California.
Fundamentals of Semiconductor Physics 万 歆 Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics Fall 2006.
This cartoon mixes 2 legends: 1. Legend of Newton, the apple & gravity which led to the Universal Law of Gravitation. 2. Legend of William Tell & the apple.
Luminescence basics Types of luminescence
Bandstructures: Real materials. Due my interests & knowledge, we’ll mostly focus on bands in semiconductors. But, much of what we say will be equally valid.
Quantum Mechanics Tirtho Biswas Cal Poly Pomona 10 th February.
Many solids conduct electricity
Electron & Hole Statistics in Semiconductors A “Short Course”. BW, Ch
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Nanoelectronics Chapter 5 Electrons Subjected to a Periodic Potential – Band Theory of Solids
Semiconductor Conductivity Ch. 1, S It is well-known that in semiconductors, there are Two charge carriers! Electrons  e - & Holes  e + What is a hole?
Kronig-Penney model and Free electron (or empty lattice) band structure Outline: Last class: Bloch theorem, energy bands and band gaps – result of conduction.
Band Theory of Solids.
Chapter Energy Bands and Charge Carriers in Semiconductors
Molecular Bonding Molecular Schrödinger equation
Metallic Solids Metallic bond: The valence electrons are loosely bound. Free valence electrons may be shared by the lattice. The common structures for.
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Schrödinger Representation – Schrödinger Equation
Today’s objectives- Semiconductors and Integrated Circuits
Lecture 2 OUTLINE Important quantities
Impurities & Defects, Continued More on Shallow Donors & Acceptors
Do all the reading assignments.
Absorbtion FTIR: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
Semiconductor crystals
Doping of Semiconductors
Why does glass absorb IR but not visible?

SEMICONDUCTORS Semiconductors Semiconductor devices
Brief Quantum Mechanics (QM) Review
University of California at Berkeley
3.1.4 Direct and Indirect Semiconductors
Tightbinding (LCAO) Approach to Bandstructure Theory
The Ig Nobel Prizes are  “Booby Prizes”!
Elementary Particles (last bit); Start Review for Final
Read: Chapter 2 (Section 2.3)
Electron & Hole Statistics in Semiconductors A “Short Course”. BW, Ch
Lecture 2 OUTLINE Semiconductor Fundamentals (cont’d)
QM2 Concept Test 2.1 Which one of the following pictures represents the surface of constant
Quantum Two.
Semiconductor Conductivity Ch. 1, S
Semiconductor Conductivity
Band Theory of Solids 1.
Bandstructure Problem: A One Dimensional Model
The Pseudopotential Method Builds on all of this.
Semiconductor crystals
More Band Structure Discussion
More Wave Equation Solutions Leading To Energy Bands 23 and 25 January 2017.
More Wave Equation Solutions Leading To Energy Bands 3 and 5 February 2014.
ECE 340 Lecture 6 Intrinsic Material, Doping, Carrier Concentrations
Defects & Impurities BW, Ch. 5 & YC, Ch 4 + my notes & research papers
Energy Band 7 In free electron model, electrons occupy positive energy levels from E=0 to higher values of energy. They are valence electron so called.
Impurities & Defects, Continued More on Shallow Donors & Acceptors
Outline of Hjalmarson, Vogl, Wolford, & Dow
More Wave Equation Solutions Leading To Energy Bands 2 and 4 February 2015.
It was authored by Prof. Peter Y. Yu, Dept. of
Energy Band View of Semiconductors
More Wave Equation Solutions Leading To Energy Bands 30 January And 1 February 2019.
Solid State Electronics ECE-1109
When Electric field is applied to free electrons
Atilla Ozgur Cakmak, PhD
Chapter 3 Energy Band Theory.
Summary, Qualitative Hydrogenic Model
Presentation transcript:

Hydrogen Atom Review of Quantum Mechanics We will discuss hydrogenic model of impurities  Useful to first review the QM of the hydrogen (H) atom. Start with Schrdinger Equation for H atom: [-()2/(2mo) -(e2/r)] = E Results (That you should know): Energies: Rydberg series: En = - (e4mo)/(22n2) , n=1,2,3,… En = - (13.6 eV)/n2 Ave. electron-proton distance (in ground state, n=1): Bohr radius: ao= 2/(e2mo) = 0.53 Å (Angstrms)

Hydrogen Atom Review of Quantum Mechanics Results: Wavefunctions: nlm(r,,)= Rnl(r)Ylm(,) Rnl(r) = radial function Ylm(,) = spherical harmonic n = 1,2,3,.. ; 0  l  n-1 -l  m  l Ground State (1s) n=1, l=0, m=0 R10(r)=  exp[-r/(2ao)] |100|2  exp[-r/ao] Bohr Radius ao A measure of average spatial separation of electron & proton.

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Levels Overview. More details later! Near the bandgap (BZ center or not), the bands look ~ like: Bandgap: forbidden energy region for the perfect solid

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Levels To perfect crystalline solid, add a defect or impurity: New one e- Hamiltonian is: H = Ho +V Ho = perfect crystal Hamiltonian  gives the bandstructures. V defect potential (discussed in detail later) Now, must solve new Schrdinger Eq. : H = (Ho +V)= E

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Levels New Schrdinger Eq. : H = (Ho +V)= E TRANSLATIONAL SYMMETRY IS BROKEN! Strictly speaking k is no longer a good quantum number & Bloch’s Theorem is not valid! Defect potential V may produce energy levels in bandgap of perfect solid. We seek these levels. That is, given V, we seek eigenvalue solutions E which are in the bandgap of the perfect solid.

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Add substitutional impurity with valence = host atom valence + 1 (DONOR) Si: host valence = 4; impurity valence = 5 (Group V atom, say As for definiteness) sp3 bonded materials:  4 electrons taken up in bonds  5th electron is not tightly bound & thus is relatively “free” to move around the lattice. 5th electron attracted to As core (which has charge +e) by screened Coulomb potential.

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative. Schematically looks like: When ionized, extra electron goes to conduction band (valence band states are full) So mo  me (CB effective mass)

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative. Single As donor atom in Si Extra e- + extra ionic charge Form of impurity potential is screened Coulomb ( dielectric const.): V  -e2/(r) Screened Coulomb potential. NOTE: Long ranged! 1 electron + Coulomb potential  Problem reduces to “Hydrogen Atom” problem with “Proton Charge”  e/½ “Electron Mass”  me = effective mass at CB bottom. Can use Rydberg formula for energy eigenvalues with these changes!

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative & semiquantitative Energy eigenvalues given by Rydberg series: En = EC - (e4me)/(222n2) n=1,2,3,… or, En = EC -(13.6 eV)(me/mo)/(2n2) En = EC - (EH)n (me/mo)/2 (EH)n true H atom energy Effective Bohr radius (ave. distance of e- from donor ion core in n=1 state) has form: a = ( 2)/(mee2) or, a = ao (mo/me) = (0.5 A)  (mo/me) ao  true H Bohr radius

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single hydrogenic donor Energy levels in bandgap: En = EC - (13.6 eV)(me/mo)/(2n2) En = EC - (EH)n (me/mo)/2 (EH)n true H atom energy For Si (& other materials),  ~ 10 Typically, me~ 0.07mo (definitely, me<<mo) En - EC ~ a few meV! (Shallow!) Donor effective Bohr radius : a = (0.5 A)  (mo/me) a = ao  (mo/me) ao  true H Bohr radius  a ~ several 10’s of Angstroms! (large!)

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single H-like donors in Ge and Si. Measured n=1 donor levels. En = EC - (EH)n (me/mo)/2  En - EC ~ a few meV! (Shallow!) Donor effective Bohr radius : a = ao  (mo/me)  a ~ several 10’s of Å ! (Large!)  Spatial extent of donor electron in ground (1s, n=1 state) is large (many lattice spacings)! |100|2  exp[-r/a]

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Donor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single H-like donors GaAs. En = EC - (EH)n (me/mo)/2 me= 0.07 mo ,  = 11  En=1 - EC = - (13.6 eV)(.07)/(121) En=1 - EC = -7.87 meV a = ao  (mo/me)  a = (0.5 Å) (11)/(0.07) a = 78.6 Å  Spatial extent of electron in ground (1s, n=1 state) is huge! |100|2  exp[-r/a]

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Add substitutional impurity with valence = host atom valence - 1 (ACCEPTOR) Si: host valence = 4; impurity valence = 3 (Group III atom, say B for definiteness) sp3 bonded materials:  Bonds want 4 e- but impurity has only 3 to give  Gets 4th e- from somewhere else (another bond, etc.) Causes B atom to be like negatively charged B- ion. Causes missing e- or hole (e+) to occur where 4th e- originally was. Positively charged hole negative B- by screened Coulomb potential.

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative. Schematically looks like: When ionized, resulting hole occurs in valence band So mo  mh (VB effective mass)

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative. Single B acceptor atom in Si Hole e+ + negative ionic charge Form of impurity potential is screened Coulomb ( dielectric const.): V  -e2/(r) Screened Coulomb potential. NOTE: Long ranged! 1 hole + Coulomb potential  Problem reduces to “Hydrogen Atom” problem with “Proton Charge”  -e/½ (<0 !) “Electron Mass”  mh = effective mass at CB bottom. Positive “electron charge” Use Rydberg formula for energy eigenvalues with these changes!

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative & semiquantitative Energy eigenvalues given by Rydberg series: En = EV + (e4mh)/(222n2) n=1,2,3,… or, En = EV +(13.6 eV)(mh/mo)/(2n2) En = EV + (EH)n (mh/mo)/2 (EH)n true H atom energy Effective Bohr radius (ave. distance of e+ from acceptor ion core in n=1 state) has form: a = ( 2 )/ (mhe2) or, a = ao (mo/me) = (0.5 A)  (mo/mh) ao  true H Bohr radius

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single hydrogenic acceptor Energy levels in bandgap: En = EV + (13.6eV)(mh/mo)/(2n2) En = EV + (EH)n (mh/mo)/2 (EH)n true H atom energy For Si (& other materials),  ~ 10 Typically, mh~ 0.3mo (definitely, me <mo) En - EV ~ few 10’s meV! (Shallow!) Acceptor effective Bohr radius : a = (0.5 A)  (mo/mh) a = ao  (mo/mh) ao  true H Bohr radius  a ~ several 10’s of Å (large!)

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single H-like acceptors in Ge and Si. Measured n=1 acceptor levels. En = EV + (EH)n (mh/mo)/2  En - EV ~ few 10’s of meV! (Shallow!) Acceptor effective Bohr radius : a = ao  (mo/mh)  a ~ several 10’s of Å ! (Large!)  Spatial extent of acceptor hole in ground (1s, n=1 state) is large (many lattice spacings)! |100|2  exp[-r/a]

Shallow (Hydrogenic) Acceptor Qualitative & semiquantitative Single H-like acceptors in GaAs. En = EV + (EH)n (mh/mo)/2 me= 0.5 mo ,  = 11  En=1 - EV = (13.6 eV)(0.5)/(121) En=1 - EC = 56.1 meV a = ao  (mo/mh)  a = (0.5 Å) (11)/(0.5) a = 11.0 Å  Spatial extent of hole in ground (1s, n=1 state) is huge! |100|2  exp[-r/a]