test limits for correction coefficient determination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OIL#19 Alternative warm-up procedure (JAPAN proposal) 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
Advertisements

GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 Serge Dubuc, WLTP GTR 15 Drafting Coordinator WLTP-09-26e.
Bimix-fuel vehicles Proposal of amendments to R. 115 and R 83.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
OIL #27 Number of tests Status report April 2015 JAPAN WLTP rev1e.
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
Definition of a Vehicle Type for IWVTA + Extension of Approvals SGR Transmitted by OICA.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
WLTP, result calculation, v6
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
MED-CSP Concentrating Solar Power for the Mediterranean Region WP0: Introduction WP1: Sustainability Goals WP2: Renewable Energy Technologies WP3: Renewable.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Status report and Discussion paper for Number of tests at WLTP Tokyo IWG in 2015 JAPAN WLTP-12-15e.
WLTP ANNEX 4 AND 7, DELTA CD*A BMW, Christoph Lueginger, Thomas Schütz ALTERNATIVE DETERMINATION METHODS WLTP-10-21e.
10/05/2010 UNECE-GFV-DF-power1 HDDF power issues – draft proposals to GFV outcome of the GFV meeting Draft amendments to R85.
GTR-EVS TF-6 SOC – OICA Discussion Paper Jan 21 st, OICA Discussion Paper for TF-Mtg1 EVSTF-06-32e.
Proposal to introduce Grouping Criteria for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles in UN Regulation No. 90 submitted.
WLTP ANNEX 4, ROAD LOAD CALCULATION Proposal for calculating the road load of individual vehicles C. Lueginger, BMW; A. Feucht, Audi WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-202.
Section 6 Miss Alicia A/P Philip Muhammad Nasyah Bin Mohd Zaini EP Ahmad Bin Lappong EP
1  Position of China and Japan Test exemption for vehicles with isolation monitoring system should be approved. The water test should be included in EVS-GTR.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
WLTP IWG ISC Taskforce: Starting note
Starting notes for Annex 4 Phase2a Issues
Informal document GRE Rev.1
Policy Making In the Public Interest
Leadership Styles Mrs. Keith 2012.
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
Improvement of Family definitions
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
R101 amendment Proposal from German
WLTP Annex 8: OVC-HEV:
Positions on open points WLTP DTP subgroup LabProcICE
Informal document GRE-79-04
Submitted by the expert from OICA
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
Interpolation family criteria OVC-HEV and NOVC-HEV (new proposal)
A CLASS OF 15 PUPILS DID A TEST WITH A POSSIBLE
Fuel Cell Vehicles - Required corrections in xxx-2016
Correlation Improvements
Mode selectable switch
GTR 15 clarification on 3g family extension rule renault
Tyre Industry contribution
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 5/2/2019.
COP procedure for Europe
Informal document GRE Rev.1
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 6/10/2019.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Informal document GRE-80-0X
8th all TF F2F Meetings EVS Washington DC
Problem with Rcda and suggestions for them
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
India Proposal on part B4 GTR-2 Amendment Criteria for % CO2 variation
CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Informal document GRE-79-xx
Japan CS/OTA 15th session, Geneva 27-28, August 2019
Presentation transcript:

test limits for correction coefficient determination 16.01.2019

test limits for corr. coefficient determination Text proposal for A Compromise approach (web/audio 21.09.15) The correction coefficient(s) shall be determined from a set of charge-sustaining tests according to paragraph 3. of Appendix 2 to this Annex. The number of tests performed by the manufacturer shall be equal or more than 5. The set of measurements shall fulfil the following criteria: This set shall contain at least one test with ΔEREESS,CS≦ 0 and at least one with ΔEREESS,CS> 0. The difference in CO2 between the test with the highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change, both are the outer tests related to the electric energy change, shall be equal or more than [5 g/km], The required number of tests can be reduced to 3 tests if the following criteria are fulfilled in addition to a) and b): the difference in CO2 between two adjacent measurements, referred to the electric energy change during the test, shall be equal or less than [10 g/km], in addition to b) the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall not be within the region that is defined by −1 % ≤ ∆E REESS E fuel ≤ +1 %, the test in between the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall be within the region defined in d). The correction coefficients determined by the manufacturer shall be reviewed and approved by the technical authority prior to its application. First text proposal how to cover suggested text by Iddo on the right hand side: The correction coefficients determined by the manufacturer shall be reviewed and approved by the technical authority prior to its application. If the set of at least 5 tests does not fulfil criterion (a) or criterion (b) or both, the manufacturer shall give evidence to the responsible authority why the vehicle is not capable to meet either or both criteria. If the responsible authority is not satisfied with the evidence, he can require additional tests to be performed. If the criteria after additional tests are still not fulfilled, the responsible authority will determine a conservative correction coefficient, based on the measurements. Final judgement by type approval authority The criteria for the RCB correction measurements are a guideline to achieve a well-defined KFUEL and a good linearity. If it is not possible to fulfil these criteria, in my view the following steps should be taken Manufacturer has to provide evidence (if applicable) why the range of ∆E REESS is too narrow why the measurement points are not evenly distributed over the ∆E REESS range why he was not able to find a measurement close to ∆E REESS =0 If the responsible authority is not satisfied with the evidence, he can require additional tests to be performed. If the criteria are not fulfilled, the responsible authority will determine a conservative correction coefficient, based on the measurements. 16.01.2019

test limits for corr. coefficient determination requirements in the case of 5 or more tests available (web/audio 21.09.15) The correction coefficient(s) shall be determined from a set of charge-sustaining tests according to paragraph 3. of Appendix 2 to this Annex. The number of tests performed by the manufacturer shall be equal or more than 5. This set shall contain at least one test with ΔEREESS,CS≦ 0 and at least one with ΔEREESS,CS> 0. The difference in CO2 between the test with the highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change, both are the outer tests related to the electric energy change, shall be equal or more than [5 g/km], At least 5 tests in the whole region. At least one test in this region. At least one test in this region. CO 2 ≧ 5g/km ∆E REESS > 0 ∆E REESS < 0 ∆E REESS 16.01.2019

test limits for corr. coefficient determination requirements in the case of 3 tests available (web/audio 21.09.15) The required number of tests can be reduced to 3 tests if the following criteria are fulfilled: the difference in CO2 between two adjacent measurements, referred to the electric energy change during the test, shall be equal or less than [10 g/km], in addition to b) the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall not be within the region that is defined by −1 % ≤ ∆E REESS E fuel ≤ +1 %, the test in between the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall be within the region defined in d). criterion c) <= 10 g/km CO 2 <= 10 g/km ∆E REESS > 0 ∆E REESS < 0 ∆E REESS 16.01.2019

test limits for corr. coefficient determination requirements in the case of 3 tests available (web/audio 21.09.15) The required number of tests can be reduced to 3 tests if the following criteria are fulfilled: the difference in CO2 between two adjacent measurements, referred to the electric energy change during the test, shall be equal or less than [10 g/km], in addition to b) the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall not be within the region that is defined by −1 % ≤ ∆E REESS E fuel ≤ +1 %, the test in between the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall be within the region defined in d). criterion b) & d) ∆E REESS E fuel =−1 % ∆E REESS E fuel =1 % −1 % ≤ ∆E REESS E fuel ≤ +1 % CO 2 >= 5g/km ∆E REESS > 0 ∆E REESS < 0 ∆E REESS 16.01.2019

test limits for corr. coefficient determination requirements in the case of 3 tests available (web/audio 21.09.15) The required number of tests can be reduced to 3 tests if the following criteria are fulfilled: the difference in CO2 between two adjacent measurements, referred to the electric energy change during the test, shall be equal or less than [10 g/km], in addition to b) the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall not be within the region that is defined by −1 % ≤ ∆E REESS E fuel ≤ +1 %, the test in between the test with highest negative electric energy change and the test with the highest positive electric energy change shall be within the region defined in d). criterion e) mid point is within the yellow region defined by d) CO 2 mid point is within the yellow region defined by d) mid point is within the yellow region defined by b) ∆E REESS > 0 ∆E REESS < 0 ∆E REESS 16.01.2019