Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IN THE NAME OF GOD By: Dr malek. References Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(5): © 2008 American Society for Clinical Pathology Bryant J, Picot J,
Advertisements

Figure 1 Estimated annual percentages of new
Copyright © 2002 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Figure 1. Serum creatinine trend in the patient
From: Routine Echocardiography Screening for Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Model-Based Estimation of the Clinical.
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Underreporting by physicians of specific treatment-associated symptoms by physicians in the TORCH trial Figure 2 | Underreporting by physicians.
Figure 2 Response after initial increase in total tumour burden
Figure 3 Response after appearance of a new lesion
Figure 5 Mutational heterogeneity in oesophageal and gastric cancer
Figure 1 Concept of the therapeutic index
Figure 4 Example of PK/PD simulation to optimize a vinorelbine treatment regimen Figure 4 | Example of PK/PD simulation to optimize a vinorelbine treatment.
Figure 2 Multiscale modelling in oncology
Figure 3 Risk-adapted and response-adapted
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of different clinical trial designs
Figure 2 Three-step approach to the assessment and management
Joerg Herrmann, MD, Amir Lerman, MD, Nicole P
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Copy-number variations in multiple myeloma
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Underreporting of treatment-related toxicities by physicians, relative to patients with either advanced-stage lung cancer, or early-stage breast.
Figure 4 Possible combination therapies CDK4/6 inhibitors
Figure 2 Therapeutic targeting of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
Figure 1 Proposed treatment algorithm for advanced gastroesophageal cancer based on publish recommendations Figure 1 | Proposed treatment algorithm for.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 4 Example of a patients with CUP
Figure 3 Care needs of patients with advanced-stage cancer
Figure 1 CAR-T-cell design
Figure 2 Examples of histopathological validation
Figure 4 Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications after anthracycline administration Figure 4 | Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications.
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Differences between MC and AC
Figure 3 Possible modalities for reconciliation of patient's and physician's report of symptomatic treatment-associated toxicities Figure 3 | Possible.
Figure 3 Algorithm for the determination of the clinical
chemotherapy for patients with MC versus those with AC
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Critical signalling pathways involved in PDAC pathogenesis
Figure 4 Treatment plans using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
Figure 3 Clinical trial design in charged-particle therapy (CPT)
Figure 2 Median monthly launch price of a new anticancer drug,
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Clinical vignette and putative causal relationships
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Fig. 2. Evidence-based medication prescriptions
Figure 5 Palliative-care-referral patterns
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 2 Frequency and overlap of alterations
Figure 2 Variations between planned and delivered doses of radiation
Figure 5 Schematic overview of a clinical decision-support
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 7 Overview of the methodological processes for
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 4 Radiogenomics analysis can reveal relationships
Figure 2 Radiomics in cardiology
Figure 1 Overview of the imaging biomarker roadmap
Adjunctive Therapies in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Patient selection. *This category included 10 patients with suspected tachyarrhythmia, 9 treated for cancer with cardiotoxic cytostatics and/or transthoracic.
Figure 3 Determination of the primary site
Number of patients who would have benefitted from addition of ACE inhibitor (ACEi), beta blockers (BB) or optimal therapy (one or both of ACEi and BB)
Expected value of perfect implementation: population net health benefit and maximum justifiable investment if all patients who were eligible received beta.
Figure 1 Gene-expression quantification methods
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Presentation transcript:

Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.171 Figure 5 Proposed algorithm for the management of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines Figure 5 | Proposed algorithm for the management of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines. Cardiac function can be monitored using serum troponin levels and/or echocardiography; findings of initial investigations dictate the necessary follow-up intervals. In practice, adherence to this type of follow-up regimen is inconsistent. Frequent testing of asymptomatic patients might lead to many 'false positives' and the resultant anxiety and possible additional unnecessary interventions and associated morbidity and costs. This, and similar algorithms have not been validated and their clinical utility is currently uncertain. ACEI, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; BB, β-blocker; CT, chemotherapy; ECHO, echocardiogram; LVD, left-ventricular dysfunction; TnI, troponin I. Modified with permission from Curigliano, G. et al. Ann. Oncol. 23, S55–S66 (2012)68. Modified with permission from Curigliano, G. et al. Ann. Oncol. 23, S55–S66 (2012) Zagar, T. M. et al. (2015) Breast cancer therapy-associated cardiovascular disease Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.171