WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
Advertisements

REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
International Office for Water Prioritisation of substances under the WFD: Compilation of the comments WG E (4), Brussels, 15-16/10/2008.
Expert Sub-Group on EQSs –1. EQS Methodology Setting –2. Prioritization ? DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCES FOR WORKING GROUP E ON PRIORITY SUBSTANCES (Collaboration.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Main aims Reporting Data Agree overall approach/framework to reporting
Japan proposal on schedule
Japan proposal on schedule
Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Prioritisation of substances under the WFD: Results of the test run
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Education and Training Statistics Working Group – June 2014
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Yearly Maintenance Process (for existing messages)
Review of the WFD priority substances list
Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Legal framework of territorial classifications and typologies for European statistics – state of play NUAC meeting, Brussels June 2015 Gorja Bartsch.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Technical review of Commission Decision 2010/477/EU concerning MSFD criteria for assessing GES Work flow and progress 20/21 October th WG GES.
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.
Proposed EQS Directive
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
Progress report Working Group D - Reporting SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Unit D.2 Water and the Marine - WFD.
SPI activities update 22nd WORKING GROUP C PLENARY MEETING
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
European Commission DG Environment
Groundwater watch list
Summary and Action Points
WGC-2 DG Meeting Towards a Guidance on Groundwater Chemical Status and Threshold Values 14:00 – 16:00 21 April 2008 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Agenda Item 10: Feedback on dangerous substances workshop and Implementation Guidance WG-E(1)-07/04/INERIS - Implementation guidance.
Paul Whitehouse Chair, EG-EQS
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Water Directors’ Meeting Working Group D (Reporting) activities
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Part I.
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
1.
WG E on Priority Substances
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Other EU Water Directives
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Agenda Item 6: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) EAF(9)-06/02/INERIS - Data processing - preparation for data collection.
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Project timeline # 3 Step # 3 is about x, y and z # 2
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Changed 3rd to next Dean Leverett Graham Merrington
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Pilot of revised survey
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007 Agenda Item 7: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-07/02/INERIS Prioritisation of substances: final draft document and open issues WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007

What’s new ? Compilation of comments received after EAF(9) Including post EAF(8) comments from UK Background document (i.e. methodological principles) updated and amended according to UK comments (version 3) Towards a tiered assessment methodology: amended according to post EAF(9) comments (version 2) Indicative lists of candidate substances: updated (version 2) Open issues

What’s old ? Choose relevant parameters Data collection & processing WFD priority substances yes Data collection & processing EU relevance? ? Further investigation Choose candidate substances Priority setting no Substances of national concern ...but, unmanageable list of candidate substances

What’s next ? Choose relevant parameters Data collection & processing WFD priority substances Data collection & processing EU relevance? Political arbitration Further investigation Choose candidate substances Priority setting Substances of national concern Please don’t forget emerging pollutants!

Compilation and analysis of MS questionnaires Choose candidate substances Compilation and analysis of MS questionnaires Candidate substances will necessarily be selected from relevant substances identified by MS

Compilation and analysis of MS questionnaires Choose candidate substances Compilation and analysis of MS questionnaires Candidate substances will necessarily be selected from relevant substances identified by MS

Choose relevant parameters Monitoring data in water Monitoring data in sediment Monitoring data in biota Ecotoxicity for aquatic organisms Ecotoxicity for benthic organisms Oral toxicity for mammals/birds Toxicity for humans Kow, vapour pressure, persistence, bioaccumulation Additional data for modelling (production, sales, releases, etc.) CAS number PEC in water (monitoring) PEC in sediment (monitoring) PEC in biota (monitoring) PNEC for aquatic organisms PNEC for benthic PNEC for secondary poisoning of predators Maximum allowed residues in food Drinking water criteria Water Solubility log Kow Vapour pressure Biodegradability Hydrolysis Production Releases PEC (modelling) Representativeness Endocrine Disruption

Choose relevant parameters: open issues Monitoring data in water Monitoring data in sediment Monitoring data in biota Ecotoxicity for aquatic organisms Ecotoxicity for benthic organisms Oral toxicity for mammals/birds Toxicity for humans Kow, vapour pressure, persistence, bioaccumulation Additional data for modelling (production, sales, releases, etc.) CAS number PEC in water (monitoring) PEC in sediment (monitoring) PEC in biota (monitoring) PNEC for aquatic organisms PNEC for benthic PNEC for secondary poisoning of predators Maximum allowed residues in food Drinking water criteria Water Solubility log Kow Vapour pressure Biodegradability Hydrolysis Production Releases PEC (modelling) Representativeness Endocrine Disruption

Choose relevant parameters: open issues Monitoring data in water Monitoring data in sediment Monitoring data in biota Ecotoxicity for aquatic organisms Ecotoxicity for benthic organisms Oral toxicity for mammals/birds Toxicity for humans Kow, vapour pressure, persistence, bioaccumulation Additional data for modelling (production, sales, releases, etc.) Maximum residue levels in foodstuffs Carcinogenicity? Risk via groundwater? Inhalation & dermal contact? R-phrases from C&L? CAS number PEC in water (monitoring) PEC in sediment (monitoring) PEC in biota (monitoring) PNEC for aquatic organisms PNEC for benthic PNEC for secondary poisoning of predators Maximum allowed residues in food Drinking water criteria Water Solubility log Kow Vapour pressure Biodegradability Hydrolysis Production Releases PEC (modelling) Representativeness Endocrine Disruption

MS monitoring data will be collected via the End User Tool Data collection: monitoring data WISE MS monitoring data will be collected via the End User Tool The COM will consider all data submitted from now to 25 May 2007 Feedback expected until 16 March 2007

Different data sources: Data collection: other data Targeted data collection for chemical/physical properties, ecotox, etc. From mid 2007 to end of 2007? Different data sources: Completed risk assessments (Tier 1 assessment) under Reg. (EEC) 793/93, Dir. 91/414/EEC, Dir. 98/8/EC (WFD Art. 16(2)a) Targeted risk assessments (Tier 2 assessment) focusing on aquatic ecotoxicity and on human toxicity via the aquatic environment (ongoing RA, RA under Dir. 93/67/EEC, VRA) (WFD Art. 16(2)b,1st §) Simplified risk assessments (Tier 3 assessment). (WFD Art. 16(2)b,2nd §) Scientific litterature, databases, etc.

Different data sources: Data collection: other data Targeted data collection for chemical/physical properties, ecotox, etc. From mid 2007 to end of 2007? Different data sources: Completed risk assessments (Tier 1 assessment) under Reg. (EEC) 793/93, Dir. 91/414/EEC, Dir. 98/8/EC (WFD Art. 16(2)a) Targeted risk assessments (Tier 2 assessment) focusing on aquatic ecotoxicity and on human toxicity via the aquatic environment (ongoing RA, RA under Dir. 93/67/EEC, VRA) (WFD Art. 16(2)b,1st §) Simplified risk assessments (Tier 3 assessment). (WFD Art. 16(2)b,2nd §) Scientific litterature, databases, etc.

Data processing Choose relevant metadata (see document for data collection) Discard data of demonstrated low quality: simplified quality check see revised background document Discard data of low plausibility (statistical outliers) according to COMMPS Aggregate data 1 data per substance × parameter according to COMMPS

Data processing Choose relevant metadata (see document for data collection) Discard data of demonstrated low quality: simplified quality check see revised background document Discard data of low plausibility (statistical outliers) according to COMMPS Aggregate data 1 data per substance × parameter according to COMMPS

It is recommended to test different algorithms Priority setting Other? Inorganics? Risk scores? Risk ratios? It is recommended to test different algorithms Should be done for 2008

Political arbitration At last*, but not least WFD priority substances Political arbitration Further investigation Substances of national concern Fix potentially remaining outstanding issues Fix criteria for EU relevance Fix the number of substances to be included in the priority list * after 2007

Feedback on the End User Tool MS Questionnaires Candidate substances Jan 07 Pilot study (UK, IE, SI, SE) Feedback on the End User Tool 16 Feb 2007 Feb 07 16 Mar 2007 Mar 07 WG E (6th March 2007) 1st data collection (Monitoring data only) Apr 07 - fix outstanding technical questions - discuss first results from the questionnaire May 07 25 May 2007 Jun 07 Expert consultation Jul 07 - Select substances for a targeted data collection Aug 07 Sep 07 2nd data collection (supp. Monitoring data, chemical/physical properties, ecotox, etc.) Oct 07 Nov 07 Dec 07 - Apply the prioritisation algorithm Priority setting 2008 - Fix potentially remaining outstanding issues - Fix criteria for EU relevance - Fix the number of substances to be included in the priority list Political arbitration Substances of national concern WFD priority substances Further investigation