Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Cheryl Y. Chan, Ashley L. St. John, Soman N. Abraham  Immunity 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Shu-Jung Chang, Jeongmin Song, Jorge E. Galán  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Brian Yordy, Norifumi Iijima, Anita Huttner, David Leib, Akiko Iwasaki 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
A Major Role for Capsule-Independent Phagocytosis-Inhibitory Mechanisms in Mammalian Infection by Cryptococcus neoformans  Cheryl D. Chun, Jessica C.S.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Michael U. Shiloh, Paolo Manzanillo, Jeffery S. Cox 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (April 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 482-492 (October 2016) Inflammation-Induced Adhesin-Receptor Interaction Provides a Fitness Advantage to Uropathogenic E. coli during Chronic Infection  Matt S. Conover, Ségolène Ruer, Joemar Taganna, Vasilios Kalas, Henri De Greve, Jerome S. Pinkner, Karen W. Dodson, Han Remaut, Scott J. Hultgren  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 482-492 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 FmlH Enhances UPEC Colonization during Chronic Cystitis (A) The log competitive infection urine titers of C3H/HeN mice infected with equal numbers of CFT073 or CFT073ΔfmlH over 28 days. 20 mice were infected over the course of 2 experiments, and 7 developed chronic cystitis. (B) Tissue log competitive indexes of mice chronically infected with CFT073 versus CFT073ΔfmlH or CFT073 versus CFT073 as controls 28 dpi. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test. Bars represent the mean of each dataset. (C) Complementation of fmlH restores virulence during chronic cystitis, 10 mice infected and 4 developed chronic cystitis. B and K represent the bladder and kidney titers 28 dpi, respectively. (D) Rates of chronic cystitis development in C3H/HeN mice infected with CFT073 (11/29) or ΔfmlH (4/29) as represented by bladder bacterial burden 28 dpi. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05, Fisher’s exact test. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 FmlHAD Binding to O-glycans (A) Schematic representation of top-scoring glycan profiles for FmlHAD. Gal, GalNAc, GlcNAc, and Neu5Ac are shown as yellow circle and yellow, blue or magenta square, respectively. (B) SPR saturation binding experiments of FmlHAD interacting with immobilized Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) and Core2 carbohydrates, revealing dissociation constants (KD) of 17.43 μM and 12.21 μM, respectively. (C) ELISA showing FmlHAD binding to BSM with and without sialidase pretreatment, n = 4. (D) ELISA results examining CFT073, CFT073ΔfmlH, or CFT073ΔfmlH:fmlH binding to sialidase-treated BSM-coated plates, n = 4. Columns represent the mean of each dataset and error bars display the SD. Asterisks denote (C) p < 0.0005 and (D) p < 0.05, Student’s t test. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 FmlHAD-TF structure and binding specificity (A) Superimposition of ribbon representation of FmlHAD (tan) and FimH (PDB: 2VCO; light blue) lectin domains. The binding pocket regions of FmlHAD (red) and FimH (blue) are formed by loops L1, L2, and L3. (B) Close-up view of the binding pocket region (L1, L2, and L3) of FmlHAD bound to Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) carbohydrate (Galß1-3GalNAc; cyan; Gal and GalNAc are labeled A and B, respectively). H bonds are depicted in yellow dashed lines. Inset, schematic representation of the Ser/Thr-Galß1-3GalNAc motif (TF). (C) Selected point mutants in the FmlHAD binding pocket abolish FmlHAD binding to sialidase treated BSM. Columns represent the mean of each dataset and error bars display the SD. Asterisks denote p < 0.005, Student's t test. (D) Close-up view of FmlHAD (red) and FimH (blue), bound to TF or oligo-mannose 3, respectively (only the reducing end Gal [cyan] or Man [magenta] are shown for comparison). H bonds are depicted in pink (for Gal/FmlHAD) or light blue (for Man/FimH) dashed lines. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Human Uromodulin Binding and Cell Line Adherence (A) FmlHAD binding to human urothelial cell lines. FmlHAD (i and ii) or K132Q (iii and iv) binding (red) to 5637 (i and iii) or T24 (ii and iv) urothelial cell lines. Hoechst DNA staining is represented by the blue in all panels. (B) FmlHAD far western on urine precipitations. Top panel (i) represents the SDS-PAGE of precipitated urine where L represents the ladder and P the urine protein concentrate. The bottom panel (ii) is a far western blot performed on the samples from (i) with FmlHAD or K132Q mutant. (C and D) ELISA showing FmlHAD and FimH binding to urine precipitate. (C) FmlHAD and K132Q or (D) FimH and Q133K binding to human urine protein precipitates. Columns represent the mean of each dataset and bars represent the SD. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 FmlH Binding and FmlH Receptor Analysis in Mouse Kidney and Bladder (A–E) Kidney: FmlHADmC (red) binding to (A) naive kidney tissue. (B) PNA (green) staining of naive kidney tissue. O-glycosidase treatment of naive kidney tissues followed by staining with (C) PNA or (D) FmlHADmC. Co-staining of naive kidney tissue with (E) PNA (green) and FmlHADmC (red), merge. (F–K) Hoechst DNA staining is represented by the blue in all panels. Bladder: FmlHADmC (red) binding to (F) naive and (I) chronically infected bladder. PNA staining (green) to (G) naive and (J) chronically infected bladders. HPA staining (green) of (H) naive and (K) chronically infected bladders. (L–N) Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase treatment of chronically infected bladders followed by (L) HPA or (N) FmlHADmC staining. Co-staining of chronically infected bladders with (M) HPA (green) and FmlHADmC, merge. Hoechst DNA staining is represented by the blue in all panels. Scale bar, 50 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 FmlH and FmlH Receptor Expression during UTI (A) qPCR of transcripts of selected Gal/GalNAc glycosylhydrolases, shown as fold change in chronically infected versus naive bladders. (B) Measure of type 1 and F9 expression during chronic cystitis by qPCR of the representative pilus subunits fimI and fmlA, shown as fold change tissue associated versus the inoculum. Columns represent the mean and bars display SD, n = 5. Dotted line represents the (A) mock-infected or (B) inoculum values. Asterisk denotes p < 0.05 Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Vaccination with FmlHAD Protects against UPEC Challenge C3H/HeN mice were either mock vaccinated or immunized with 30 μg of FmlHAD. Mice were subsequently challenged with CFT073 and sacrificed 1, 2, or 3 dpi. (A and B) Bacterial titers for the (A) bladder and (B) kidney are shown, the bars representing the mean of each sample. Asterisks denote p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney test. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 482-492DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions