Clinical survey over the past 35 years at the clinic for maxillofacial prosthetics Tokyo Medical and Dental University  Ayaka Yanagi, Yuka Sumita, Mariko Hattori, Ayuko Kamiyanagi, Takafumi Otomaru, Ayako Kanazaki, Mihoko Haraguchi, Mai Murase, Noriko Hatano, Hisashi Taniguchi  Journal of Prosthodontic Research  Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 309-312 (July 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002 Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Number of patients. The number of patients was calculated and compared between groups. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 62, 309-312DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002) Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Patients’ age. The subjects who were divided into 10-year age groups, each representing every 10 years between 0 and 99. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 62, 309-312DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002) Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Primary conditions. Primary conditions of the patients were classified as cleft palate, tumor, cyst, inflammation, and other. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 62, 309-312DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002) Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Referral details of the patients. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 62, 309-312DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002) Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Classification of referral institutions. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2018 62, 309-312DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2017.12.002) Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions