Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Annotation and characterization of genomic target of p63 in mouse keratinocytes (MK) based on ChIP-Seq. (A) Scatterplot representing high degree.
Advertisements

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Chromatin Control of Developmental Dynamics and Plasticity
Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis in Melanoma Reveals the Importance of CpG Methylation in MITF Regulation  Martin Lauss, Rizwan Haq, Helena Cirenajwis,
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Lucas J.T. Kaaij, Robin H. van der Weide, René F. Ketting, Elzo de Wit 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (August 2017)
Chromatin regulation upon recruitment of HOTAIR
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e5 (October 2018)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Remco van Doorn, Willem H. Zoutman, Nelleke A. Gruis 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Functional Modulation of IGF-Binding Protein-3 Expression in Melanoma
Shiqi Xie, Jialei Duan, Boxun Li, Pei Zhou, Gary C. Hon  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers  Julia B. Carleton, Kristofer.
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e6 (October 2018)
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 422-431 (May 2016) Bivalent Regions of Cytosine Methylation and H3K27 Acetylation Suggest an Active Role for DNA Methylation at Enhancers  Jessica Charlet, Christopher E. Duymich, Fides D. Lay, Kamilla Mundbjerg, Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen, Gangning Liang, Peter A. Jones  Molecular Cell  Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 422-431 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 H3K27ac Co-exists with DNA Methylation at Regular and Super-enhancers, but Not at Promoters (A–F) Smooth scatterplots of H3K27ac-enriched region quantifications (log2 of read count) against the average DNA methylation level of the CpG sites within the same regions in HMECs (A), MCF7 cells (B), PRECs (C), PC3 cells (D), normal colon cells (E), and HCT116 cells (F). Promoters are defined by H3K27ac peaks within ±1,500 bp of TSSs, while regular enhancers comprise H3K27ac peaks outside the ±1,500 bp TSSs, but not part of a super-enhancer region. Super-enhancers are defined by H3K27ac peaks or constituents that are not part of regular enhancers or TSSs. White dotted threshold lines have been drawn at 30% and 70% for DNA methylation cutoffs. The cold-to-warm color scale indicates a low-to-high density in the scatterplot. Percentages in the squares reflect the percentage of H3K27ac regions that fall between the indicated boundaries. (G–I) Genome browser shots of regular (G and H) and super-enhancer (I) regions. The first track shows binding sites of TCF4 in purple. This is followed by a gene, CGI, and H3K27ac peak tracks in HCT116 cells. Wiggle plots of H3K27ac ChIP-seq enrichment in HCT116 cells and NOMe-seq data are shown below. The first track of the NOMe-seq heatmap shows HCT116 CpG methylation from low to high (green to red), followed by accessibility from low to high (yellow to blue). Black boxes highlight regions of focal DNA demethylation with high H3K27ac enrichment, chromatin accessibility, and TCF4 binding. Pink boxes highlight regions with H3K27ac enrichment and DNA methylation in HCT116 cells. Orange boxes indicate TSSs. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Bivalent Chromatin Exists at Enhancers, but Not at Promoters (A) Schematic representation of the CDKN2A promoter. H3K27ac enrichment in HCT116 cells is shown in light blue, followed by the CDKN2A TSS as an arrow, a CpG island in green, and the region amplified by PCR in black. Input and H3K27ac ChIP DNA was bisulfite sequenced. Every row shows a different clone and every circle a CpG site. White circles indicate unmethylated sites, while black circles are methylated CpG sites. (B) Three consecutive methylated and H3K27ac-marked regions from our genome-wide data within a 2.4-kb super-enhancer containing a CGI (green) in the middle were sequenced to eliminate a possible ChIP bias of pulling down methylated regions. Both input and H3K27ac pull-down show nearly 100% methylation in these regions. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TCF4 Binding Is Reduced at Bivalent Enhancers (A) Bar graphs of the percentage of H3K27ac peaks bound by TCF4 in regular and super-enhancers in HCT116 cells. H3K27ac peaks are categorized into three methylation groups according to their average methylation level (<30, 30–70, >70). Peaks bound once by TCF4 are shown in blue, while those bound multiple times are shown in green. (B) DNA methylation level at ±500 bp of the TCF4-binding center in regular and super-enhancers. Every line indicates a TCF4-binding site in HCT116 cells that is maintained in the same order in (C). Every CpG site is indicated on a 0%–100% methylation, green-to-red scale. The order shows the highest average DNA methylation at the top of the scatterplots. (C) Accessibility plots indicate GpC methylation levels from 0%–100% accessible on a yellow-to-blue color scale. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DNA Methylation Maintains the H3K27ac Mark at Regular and Super-enhancers (A) Bar graphs of the percentage of HCT116 H3K27ac peaks maintained in demethylated DKO1 cells for the category of lowly (<30%) and highly (>70%) methylated peaks. Dark blue percentages indicate regular enhancers in DKO1 cells, while light blue ones indicate super-enhancer constituents in DKO1 cells. A significant difference (∗∗∗p < 0.001) in maintenance between lowly and highly methylated peaks was established in DKO1 cells for regular and super-enhancers. (B) Genome browser shots of regular (left) and super-enhancer (right) regions lost in DKO1 cells. The first track shows binding sites of TCF4 in purple. This is followed by a gene and a CGI track in HCT116 and DKO1 cells. Wiggle plots of H3K27ac ChIP-seq enrichment in HCT116 and DKO1 cells with their respective NOMe-seq data are shown below. The DNA methylation NOMe-seq heatmap shows CpG methylation from low to high (green to red). See also Figures S4B, S4C, and S5F. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 H3K27ac Remains on the Methylated Strand of Bivalent Enhancers and They Regain DNA Methylation after 5-Aza-CdR Treatment (A and B) Input and H3K27ac ChIP DNA of control and 5-Aza-CdR-treated samples after 14 days of recovery were bisulfite converted and sequenced to show HCT116 regular (A) and super-enhancer (B) regions that are close to 100% methylation. At day 14, the input samples had considerably lost their initial DNA methylation and were not marked by H3K27ac in DKO1 cells in our genome-wide datasets. The H3K27ac pull-down samples had barely changed. This shows that H3K27ac only remains on the methylated strand and is lost on the demethylated daughter strand. Every row shows a different clone and every circle a CpG site. White circles indicate unmethylated sites, while black circles are methylated CpG sites. (C) Boxplots of 7,460 regular enhancers and 1,124 super-enhancer constituents with an initial methylation level >70%. Their average CpG methylation level is shown at days 0 (control sample), 5, 25, and 42 after 5-Aza-CdR treatment. The original DNA methylation level is greatly regained at day 25. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2016 62, 422-431DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.033) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions