Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Would you be chosen to serve on a jury for a death penalty case?
Advertisements

The Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment. Admin Opportunity to participate, be on the news! 2:00, Thursday, Room 117 Wooten – First 60 students – Line.
Vengeance, Retribution, or Mistake? Discussing the Death Penalty in America, Presentation to the Justice Project Washington, DC, May 15, 2003.
The Court-Martial Process Military Law – Week 8 Jay Canham.
Death Penalty Ryan Moye. hoice_polls/neDs3TD34MfobgO hoice_polls/neDs3TD34MfobgO.
Sarah Bibbey September 28,  There are 34 states that have the Death Penalty.  Also the U.S. Gov’t, and U.S. Military have the Death Penalty. 
Chapter 16 Lesson 2 Civil and Criminal Law. Crime and Punishment crime  A crime is any act that harms people or society and that breaks a criminal law.
Courts at Work. Criminal cases An adult criminal case has many steps It usually is not completed in one day, especially felony cases The first step is.
Chapter 14 Capital Punishment & the Death Row Inmate 1.
Capital Procedure/ Severe Mental Disability An Act to Amend the Capital Trial, Sentencing, and Post-Conviction Procedures for persons with Severe Mental.
Death Penalty Comparing the death penalty in Georgia and the United States to the rest of the World.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
The Constitution explicitly permits capital punishment – if you may not be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” then you.
Disabled People and the Justice System: Another Institution Disability and Society Spring 2007.
WHY I H8 the DeAtH PeNaLtY !!!!!!!!!!! KILLING IS BAD N’KAY.
Constitutional Criminal Procedure
Atkins v. Virginia Peter Diddy Period 6 Constitutional Law.
Capital Cases: Roles of Forensic Psychology. Roles of forensic psychologist in a capital case Capital cases –Capital means “head” in Latin Punishment.
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT MAY 5, Capital Murder in Texas  Murdering a peace officer or firefighter, who is acting in the lawful discharge of an official.
Aging Prisoners’ Concerns Toward Dying in Prison Emily Vigiard.
By: Radha Dubey Becoming A Marketer, lawyer and politician.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE TODAY, 9E PRENTICE HALL By Frank Schmalleger ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Courts: Structure and Participants CHAPTER 9.
Ending the Death Penalty for Mental Illness
Do you support the death penalty?
The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
The Criminal Justice System
Taking Part in Government
Georgia’s Government JUDICIAL BRANCH JUDICIAL BRANCH © Brain Wrinkles.
VIII. DEATH PENALTY CONSIDERATIONS
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
How do the fifth, sixth and eighth amendments protect rights within the judicial system? LESSON 32.
Capital Punishment.
Evaluation of Society’s Interest in the Official Statistics and Calculation of the Society’s Interest Index Laima Grižaitė Deputy head, Public Relations.
The Federal Court System
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Unusually Cruel, Part III
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
Georgia’s Government JUDICIAL BRANCH © Brain Wrinkles.
Court Case Proceedings
Capital Punishment.
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Convicting the Innocent, Ch 6 - Problems in the Trials
Rights, Duties, and Responsibilities
Deadly Justice, Ch 14, 15 - Cost - Deterrence
United States of America v. Burns
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Racial Justice Act, Part II
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Chapter Twenty The Death Penalty
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
You are the governor!.
Capital Punishment GOVT 2306, Module 10
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Reactions to Deviance.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
SENTENCING IN NEW YORK STATE
CASE OF THE DAY “Confinement for 2 Athletes in Sex Abuse of Teammates”
The Courts AP US Government.
Trial Procedures Lesson 54 CLU 3MR.
Steps in a Criminal Case
The U.S. Judicial System.
Ap u.s. government & politics
Sentencing.
Courtroom to Classroom:
Gregg vs Georgia.
Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch.
Presentation transcript:

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 Deadly Justice, Ch 11-13 - Stays of Execution - Mental Health - Public Opinion Announcements: Death row visits set up for Feb 23, April 30, May 4, 7, 11. Poll Everywhere: make sure you are signed up. We will test the system today. First speakers event: Next Monday! PollEverywhere at beginning. Don’t be late. Catch-up from last time: Elbridge Gerry, his grandson, and their collective contributions to the US; Edison, Westinghouse, and the “war of currents” (and the unfortunate Mr. Kemmler); lethal injection paradox Questions before we start? Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 https://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/psqd8fi7I5wyACZ Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 Stays Death Warrant: signed (usually by the governor) setting the date and time of your execution. Typically 30-90 days in advance. Differs by state, of course. DPIC page on upcoming executions. Some are scheduled YEARS ahead of time. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/upcoming-executions Note that so many are cancelled Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Uncertainty and the element of torture Threat of death, relief from the threat, threat again, relief, threat, relief, etc. One natural reaction to those tortured in this manner is to seek to “get it over with” 1890, Medley: condemned had to wait, in solitary confinement, for 4 weeks, all the time being uncertain as to whether the governor might commute the sentence or if it would be carried out. See Justice Breyer’s comment in Glossip, p. 217 of our book. Note: on-again off-again nature of the process includes reversals as well as stays Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 How common are stays? DPIC lists all scheduled executions from 2010 through 2015 285 stays 234 executions You can do the math. Stays are pretty common PA database on all death warrants 433 death warrants Almost stayed more than a month before the execution 71 stayed less than 7 days before the date 5 less than 1 day Only 3 executions in PA since 1976, all volunteers Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

No comprehensive data, but… Stays are not uncommon Lawyers continue the fight right to the very last minute Uncertainty shrouds the process to the end Many inmates have had their last meals several times. Troy Davis example, as we will see later. A paradox: A stay is “good news” for the defense team, and they seek a stay. But a system with so many stays and so much uncertainty is unsettling and seems akin to torture. No winners on any side here. Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 Mental Health Betsy Neill: senior thesis project Constitutional issues Atkins v. Virginia (2002): low IQ prohibits execution (contradicting 1989 Penry v. Lynaugh, holding that it was ok; evolving standards of decency…) Ford v. Wainwright (1986): inmate must understand the reason for execution Several cases: can the state forcibly medicate the person, to make them sane enough? Mental Illness and intellectual capacity separate issues Illness at the time of the crime v. at the time of execution Note: Texas “future dangerousness” may make illness an aggravator… Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 Data and results Court and media records from 2000 through 2015 Older data hard to find on-line This probably under-estimates mental illness quite dramatically May not be mentioned in trial May not be mentioned in any news coverage Often requires official medical diagnosis, hospitalization, school records, testing, etc. Many people never get tested, so there could be a lot of illness that was never diagnosed. Note the legal paradox: Low IQ or mental illness may be a mitigator or make you exempt from the death penalty. But it is also very pejorative so IQ test administrators generally seek to “nudge up” people, especially in school-related cases, where special education is more expensive… Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 The bottom line: The mentally ill are highly vulnerable. And jurors may be scared of them, or think they have no remorse… Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Rates of serious mental illness much higher Serious mental illness more common Volunteers for execution compared to others executed Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

How would you respond, as a juror? Inmate is crazy. Abusive childhood, maybe deep anger, anti-social behavior, not sense of “what is right”, maybe very violent, perhaps sexually violent Crime may be particularly heinous, violent Courtroom demeanor may be inappropriate May not cooperate with his own attorney Turns out, this does not work very well for the inmate… Texas: “future dangerousness” must be considered. Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

OK to execute veterans? Those with PTSD from their military service? About 10 percent of those executed have been veterans. Of course, military service may have had nothing to do with their crime. But many appear to have had symptoms of PTSD. Perhaps it makes the crimes more heinous than what a “sane” person would do. Is that an appropriate aggravator, or should it be a mitigator? Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 Public opinion: The Gallup Poll Question: “Are you in favor of or opposed to the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?” Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 See the Gallup web site itself. Every year they give a comprehensive update http://news.gallup.com/poll/221030/death-penalty-support-lowest- 1972.aspx Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Question wording matters Higher support: Generic question Specific individuals such as Saddam Hussein, Timothy McVeigh, Unibomber Lower support: DP v. LWOP v. possibility of parole Young defendant Felony murder cases / accomplice to the crime (very low support) Also note: death penalty is very rare. And people not supporting the death penalty can’t be on the jury. So there is something different from answering the generic Gallup Poll question and voting for death. Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

A dynamic dyad-ratios algorithm (thank you, Jim Stimson) Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Opinion index: up from 1970s through 1995, then down. Death Penalty and general punitiveness Opinion and actual death sentences Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

State by state variation: no impact, huh?! Regions of Texas. Houston not the highest. Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018

Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018 An opinion paradox Generally pretty high levels of support, in the abstract But very low levels of actual use Political leaders have felt the power of public opinion on this Since the mid-1990s, significant declines in support LWOP is available Crime rates have dropped Concerns about innocence / exonerations Several states have abolished, through LEGISLATIVE action, and the politicians did not get booted out. So some big shifts in the last 20 years, as compared to the earlier period Baumgartner, POLI 203, Spring 2018