Setting Classboundaries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring network development for the WFD in The Netherlands: State of affairs Jos Timmerman RIZA.
Advertisements

Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Estimation of uncertainty in status class assessment for Wel waterbodies Jannicke.
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
DRAFT Intercalibration of methods to evaluate river EQ using fish Niels Jepsen, JRC & Didier Pont, Cemagref.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 4-5 MARCH 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Progress Report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso Joint Research Centre.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Böhmer, J. Birk, S., Schöll, F. Intercalibration of large river assessment methods.
11 juni 2007 Ecological classification in the Netherlands1 Diederik van der Molen Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management CIS workshop.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
Comparison of freshwater nutrient boundary values Geoff Phillips 1 & Jo-Anne Pitt 2 1 University of Stirling & University College London 2 Environment.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution on Rivers and Lakes Item 4 Recent results and updating.
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Intercalibration Results 2006
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Dave Jowett, Chair UK Marine Task Team
ECOSTAT WG 2A, JRC - Ispra (I), 7-8 July 2004
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
One-out-all-out and other indicators
GEP vs. GES.
RIVER GIG reports to ECOSTAT Central Baltic Rivers GIG
EurAqua 8th Scientific and Technical Review,
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
EU Water Framework Directive
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Water Directors meeting - Dresden
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
One-out-all-out and other indicators
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Intercalibration of Opportunistic Algae Blooms
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
One-out-all-out and other indicators
The normal balance of ingredients
Definition and Establishment of Reference Conditions
Lake Macroinvertebrate IC EC-GIG
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
IC manual: what and why Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
of the Work Programme 17. March 2003
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Metadata analysis.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Intercalibration: problems of selecting types
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
EU Water Framework Directive
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
EU Water Framework Directive
Typology and Intercalibration Typology System
Fish intercalibration – rivers Progress and expected outcome
Working Group on Reference Conditions
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Setting Classboundaries Elaborated for the REFCOND partner of the Netherlands RIZA - Ministry of Transport and Waterways by Royal Haskoning Roel Knoben & Arend de Wilde RIZA December 2001

Setting Classboundaries This presentation Based on a draft report Intention is to discuss aspects related with the setting of Classboundaries for the Ecological Quality Status for Rivers and Lakes RIZA December 2001

Setting Classboundaries This presentation Our position within the WFD - 2 minutes Interpretation of some relevant aspects of the WFD - 4 Principal results on Classboundaries of the Questionnaires - 8 Setting Classboundaries, theoretical and practical observations - 16 RIZA December 2001

Our position within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Classification of waterbodies within the WFD

Setting classboundaries is principally related to: Reference conditions Metrics - Methods of processing monitoringresults Ecological Quality Ratio Intercalibration excercise

Results of the Questionnaires

Results of the Questionnaires Actual use of quality elements for setting Classboundaries

Results of the Questionnaires Actual use of quality elements for setting Classboundaries Physico-chemical elements most used Hydromorphological elements seldom used

Results of the Questionnaires Actual use of quality elements for setting Classboundaries Biological elements Benthic invertebrate fauna and fish most frequently used for rivers Phytoplancton most frequently used for lakes

Results of the Questionnaires Actual use of quality elements for setting Classboundaries Physico-chemical elements More elements used for rivers Roughly the same importance for rivers and lakes

Results of the Questionnaires Number of actually used Classes for quality-elements

Results of the Questionnaires Number of actually used Classes for quality-elements Rivers Range 2-7 Average close to 5 Most variation in Physico-chemical elements

Results of the Questionnaires Number of actually used Classes for quality-elements Lakes Range 3-7 Average close to 5 Most variation in Biological elements

Conclusions of the questionnaires The questionnaire has given an insight in the actual use of the quality elements but not on how the classboundaries have been defined. There is no clear preference for a method for the setting of classboundaries There is insufficient knowledge of the inherent statistical errors of the used methods

Setting Classboundaries, practical observations theoretical and practical observations

The quality elements “one out-all out”

The quality elements / one out-all out Monitoring results

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out

The quality elements / one out-all out monitoring

The quality elements / one out-all out WFD:Annex V:1.2.1 + 1.2.2. + Number of Q-elements Rivers Lakes High 10 9 Good 6 6 Moderate 4 4 + Fits to national systems + Integrates information avoiding ecological complications + More flexible through descriptors (climate change, succession)

The quality elements / one out-all out WFD:Annex V:1.2.1 + 1.2.2. + Number of Q-elements Rivers Lakes High 10 9 Good 6 6 Moderate 4 4 + Fits to national systems + Integrates information avoiding ecological complications + More flexible through descriptors (climate change, succession)

Annex V: 1.2.1

The quality elements / one out-all out WFD:Annex V:1.2.1 + 1.2.2. + Number of Q-elements Rivers Lakes High 10 9 Good 6 6 Moderate 4 4 + Fits to national systems + Integrates information avoiding ecological complications + More flexible through descriptors (climate change, succession)

The quality elements and classes Value Quality element Value environmental factor EQR = 1

The quality elements and classes Value Quality element Value environmental factor EQR = 1

The quality elements and classes Value Quality element Value environmental factor EQR = 1

The quality elements and classes Value Quality element Value environmental factor EQR = 1

The quality elements and classes Value Quality element Value environmental factor EQR = 1

Conclusions on Q-elements: Setting classboundaries requires the definition of the Q-elements The definition of the Q-elements has a fargoing practical impact The WFD is not completely clear

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries ?

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries

Theoretical approach on the classboundaries Quality elements

Conclusions of the theoretical approach: RC=High status; boundary High/good defined boundary Good/moderate defined trough Q-elements + EQR

to set the Classboundaries Taking decisions to set the Classboundaries

Taking decisions to set the Classboundaries Monitoring Reference state Evaluation scientific scientific Classification arbitrary Quality classes Class boundaries political Compliance testing political Standards

to set the Classboundaries The process to set the Classboundaries

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring EQR Define metrics Set the classboundaries Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring EQR Define metrics Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the number of the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring EQR Define metrics Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Taxonomic level? Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Abundance? Composition? EQR Define metrics Linear gradient Ordination Scoring-system Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Standards ISO, NEN EQR Define metrics Research/ monitoring Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Standards ISO, NEN EQR Define metrics Research/ monitoring Intercalibration excercise Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Standards ISO, NEN EQR Define metrics Research/ monitoring Intercalibration excercise Set the good/ moderate boundary National authorities European authorities Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Standards ISO, NEN EQR Define metrics Research/ monitoring Intercalibration excercise Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

The process to set the Classboundaries Typify watertypes Define the Quality elements Set the high/good boundary Select the reference conditions Select methods for monitoring Standards ISO, NEN EQR Define metrics Research/ monitoring Intercalibration excercise Set the good/ moderate boundary Classify waterbodies

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise

Final conclusions Most quality elements of the WFD are actually used for monitoring by the partnercountries The actually used quality elements are roughly divided in 5 qualityclasses Most partner countries utilize only a few of theses quality elements for monitoring The Reference condition is represented by a range of values and coincide with the High Status Setting Classboundaries is and arbitrary process based on political and scientifical concepts Classboundaries can be set only after defining the quality elements The quality elements should be only the 10 mentioned in the Annex V:1.2 Setting classboundaries has to be done in close interaction with the intercalibration exercise