The Function of Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase and Ap4A as Signaling Regulators of MITF Activity in FcϵRI-Activated Mast Cells  Yu-Nee Lee, Hovav Nechushtan, Navah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 7 Localization of the element(s) responsible for the transcriptional suppression by PPAR-γ. A, Rat VSMCs were transfected with either −1969/+104-luc,
Advertisements

Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Signal transduction pathways triggered by the FcϵRIIb receptor (CD23) in human monocytes lead to nuclear factor-κB activation  Rosa M. Ten, MD, PhDa,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Tom Misteli, David L Spector  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
David X Liu, Lloyd A Greene  Neuron 
Estela Jacinto, Guy Werlen, Michael Karin  Immunity 
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Expression and regulation of Toll-like receptor 2 by IL-1β and fibronectin fragments in human articular chondrocytes  S.-L. Su, M.S., C.-D. Tsai, Ph.D.,
CoREST Represses the Heat Shock Response Mediated by HSF1
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Ras Enhances Myc Protein Stability
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
p53DINP1, a p53-Inducible Gene, Regulates p53-Dependent Apoptosis
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
A Novel Role of Transforming Growth Factor β1 in Transcriptional Repression of Human Cholesterol 7α-Hydroxylase Gene  Tiangang Li, John Y.L. Chiang  Gastroenterology 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Regulation of the Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule Gene in Melanoma: Modulation of mRNA Synthesis by Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Phorbol Ester, and.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Regulation of Skeletal Myogenesis by Association of the MEF2 Transcription Factor with Class II Histone Deacetylases  Jianrong Lu, Timothy A. McKinsey,
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Tom Misteli, David L Spector  Molecular Cell 
CoCoA, a Nuclear Receptor Coactivator which Acts through an N-Terminal Activation Domain of p160 Coactivators  Jeong Hoon Kim, Hongwei Li, Michael R Stallcup 
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

The Function of Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase and Ap4A as Signaling Regulators of MITF Activity in FcϵRI-Activated Mast Cells  Yu-Nee Lee, Hovav Nechushtan, Navah Figov, Ehud Razin  Immunity  Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 145-151 (February 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2

Figure 1 Characterization of MITF/Hint Protein Complex Dissociation by Ap4A (A and B) Screening for the ApnA that affects the MITF/Hint protein complex. MITF/Hint protein complex was exposed to various types of ApnA compounds for 1 hr at 37°C. Only Ap4A affects the pull-down assay of [35S] MITF by GST-Hint. (C) MITF/Hint protein complex was incubated with AMP-NH2 and AMP for 1 hr at 37°C and then the pull-down assay of [35S] MITF by GST-Hint was carried out. (D) Ap4A-mediated and dose-dependent dissociation of MITF/Hint complex. Increasing amounts of Ap4A were added to the MITF/Hint protein complex and pull-down assay was carried out. (E) Kinetic analysis of the MITF/Hint protein complex dissociation. The complex was exposed to 100 μM Ap4A for 20, 40, and 60 min and then pull-down assay of [35S] MITF by GST-Hint was determined. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 2 Specific Binding of Ap4A to Hint (A) Determination of direct interaction of Ap4A with GST/Hint via BIAcore analysis. Representative sensograms of Ap4A binding to immobilized GST-Hint and GST-MITF are shown. The background sensogram of GST alone was subtracted from the sensograms of GST-Hint and GST-MITF. Significant binding of the Ap4A to GST-Hint is observed with 15 RU due to relatively low molecular weight of Ap4A. (B) Dose-dependent binding of Ap4A to GST/Hint. Representative sensogram of 50, 100, and 200 μM of Ap4A binding to immobilized GST/Hint. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 3 Determination of the MITF and LysRS Protein Complex (A) The bHLH-zip of MITF that was used as a bait in yeast two-hybrid screening. (B) Coimmunoprecipitation of MITF with LysRS. Quiescent cells and cells activated via aggregation of FcϵRI receptor by incubating cells with IgE and antigen were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-MITF antibody, and the resolved immunocomplex was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-LysRS antibody. (C) Pull-down assay of [35S] methionine-labeled LysRS by GST-MITF and GST-Hint fusion protein. The GST-MITF and GST-Hint proteins were bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads and were incubated with [35S] methionine-labeled LysRS overnight at 4°C. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 4 In Vivo Function Analysis of the Dissociation of Hint from MITF in Activated RBL Cells (A) Accumulation of Ap4A upon activation of the RBL cells. RBL cells were activated by aggregation of FcϵRI with IgE and antigen. Ap4A was measured luminometrically as described in the Experimental Procedures. The bars show concentration average of Ap4A determined from three independent experiments. (B) Accumulation of Ap4A in activated BMMC via the aggregation of FcϵRI. The bars show concentration from three determinations (C). The dissociation of MITF/Hint protein complex in vivo by ApnA. RBL cells were introduced with 100 μM of various types of ApnA compounds. The cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-MITF antibody. The resolved immunocomplex was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Hint antibody. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 5 Ap4A Regulates MITF Transcriptional Activity (A) Gel shift analysis to show that Hint prevents MITF from binding to the E box element. MITF protein was incubated with increasing concentrations of GST-Hint (+, 2 μg; ++, 3 μg; +++, 4 μg) and then 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the mMCP-6 promoter was added. One representative of three experiments is shown. (B) Supression of Hint-mediated inhibition of MITF transcriptional activity by Ap3A and Ap4A. The normalized value was expressed as relative luciferase activity. One representative experiment out of three is shown. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 6 Determination of the Expression Level of the MITF-Responsive Genes in RBL and BMMC Administered with ApnA (A) Determination of the expression level of the MITF-responsive genes in unstimulated RBL cells administered with 100 μM of either Ap3A, Ap4A, or Ap5A. The mRNA quantitation of RMCP-6, c-kit, GrB (granzyme B), and TPH (tryptophan hydroxylase) was determined by SYBR-green incorporation to real-time PCR in RBL cells. Expression levels were normalized to GAPDH and β actin housekeeping genes. One representative experiment out of three is shown. (B) BMMC were administered with 100 μM of Ap4A and the mRNA quantitation of mMCP-6 and c-kit were determined by SYBR-green incorporation to real-time PCR in BMMC. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)

Figure 7 Proposed Model for the Mechanism by which Ap4A Affects the Transcriptional Activity of MITF Ap4A produced by LysRS following specific stimuli accumulates in proximity to the multiprotein complex of LysRS/MITF/Hint and then binds to Hint and liberates MITF for its DNA binding activity. Immunity 2004 20, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00020-2)