Emergent acoustic order in arrays of mosquitoes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why some bird brains are larger than others
Advertisements

Cell Adhesion: Sizing Up a Sticky Situation
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Cryptic genetic variation
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Flying in Tune: Sexual Recognition in Mosquitoes
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Musical Consonance: The Importance of Harmonicity
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain
Linguistic Relativity: Does Language Help or Hinder Perception?
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
The cry embedded within the purr
Alternative Strategies: The Evolution of Switch Points
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Wild Birds Use an Ordering Rule to Decode Novel Call Sequences
Jason Samaha, Bradley R. Postle  Current Biology 
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Frank Tong  Current Biology 
Auditory Neuroscience: How to Encode Microsecond Differences
High Resilience of Seed Dispersal Webs Highlighted by the Experimental Removal of the Dominant Disperser  Sérgio Timóteo, Jaime Albino Ramos, Ian Phillip.
Michael J.L. Magrath, Oscar Vedder, Marco van der Velde, Jan Komdeur 
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Myopia: The Importance of Seeing Fine Detail
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages R709-R711 (September 2013)
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Sex Recognition through Midflight Mating Duets in Culex Mosquitoes Is Mediated by Acoustic Distortion  Ben Warren, Gabriella Gibson, Ian J. Russell  Current.
Selfish-herd behaviour of sheep under threat
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Pritam Chanda, Aidong Zhang, Daniel Brazeau, Lara Sucheston, Jo L
Steven K. Schwartz, William E. Wagner, Eileen A. Hebets 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Andrew Clouter, Kimron L. Shapiro, Simon Hanslmayr  Current Biology 
Attention Reorients Periodically
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence
Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback  Daniel J. Mennill, Sandra L. Vehrencamp 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R373-R375 (May 2009)
Higher-Order Figure Discrimination in Fly and Human Vision
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Coupled Oscillator Dynamics of Vocal Turn-Taking in Monkeys
Søren K. Andersen, Steven A. Hillyard, Matthias M. Müller 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Basal bodies Current Biology
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Circadian Biology: The Early Bird Catches the Morning Shift
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
A way of selectively degrading colour constancy demonstrates the experience dependence of colour vision  Eli Brenner, Frans W. Cornelissen  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Emergent acoustic order in arrays of mosquitoes Andrew Aldersley, Alan Champneys, Martin Homer, Nikolai W.F. Bode, Daniel Robert  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages R1208-R1210 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.055 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Variation of acoustic characteristics in mosquito groups of increasing size. (A) Schematic of recording array. The flight tones of individuals were recorded on separate microphones passed through an integrating sound amplifier. Coloured dots indicate the fixed positional orientation of individuals in the array. (B) Example time-frequency spectra selected for single recordings of group sizes N = 3 and N = 8 individuals, showing the fundamental flight tone component of each male. Colours give the position of males in the array as shown in (A). (C) Distributions of sorted pairwise wing-beat frequency differences (left) and group spread (right) for live and non-interactive arrays. Non-interactive arrays are composed of either randomly combined males recorded in separate groups (random group), or randomly combined males recorded alone (random lone). Full details provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Metrics are calculated at each sampled time point per recording and aggregated over all individuals for a given group size in all replicate trials. Data presented for array sizes N = 3 and N = 8. For non-interactive groups, distributions shown are from a single iteration of the random-sampling procedure (see Supplemental Information). (D) The median flight tone separation between an individual male and his nearest neighbour in the frequency domain, aggregated over all individuals for a given group size. (E) The median aggregated group spread of wing-beat frequencies. (F) Clustering: the proportion of recording time for which an individual has at least two partners within 20 Hz of his own wing-beat frequency. Plotted is the mean cluster fraction taken over all males at a given group size. (D–F) Shaded region indicates the mean test statistic (± standard deviation) obtained from 1000 iterations of the random sampling procedure used to generate non-interactive groups (see Supplemental Information). Each iteration contained a set of groups equal in number to those recorded during experiments for each array size N = 3 to N = 8 (replicates for N = 3, 14; N = 4, 17; N = 5, 17; N = 6, 13; N = 7, 14; and N = 8, 15). For actual groups, the shaded region gives the mean (± standard deviation) taken from 1000 bootstrap iterations of the data. Current Biology 2017 27, R1208-R1210DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.055) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions