Favourable Reference Values

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.

Advertisements

REPORTING PURSUANT TO ART. 17 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE

Expert Group on the Mobility of Young Volunteers: State of Play

Report by the VICH Steering Committee on issues raised by Forum members during the 1st Outreach Forum meeting Hervé Marion, DVM VICH Secretariat.

Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU

Low Hanging Fruits Mora Aronsson ETC-BD/SLU

The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process in its strategic context

Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

ICES led Reviews of D3, D4, D6 & D11

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.

Two major points discussed

Constance von Briskorn BIO by Deloitte 13-14th October 2014

Structure of the guidelines Reminder on next steps

Results from Article 17 & 12 reports - Some data related issues Douglas Evans European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity Expert Group on Reporting.

ARTICLE 17 REPORTING: SUMMARY OF MAIN RESULTS

WP 1 - Review of the Art.17 reporting format & guidelines

WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives

Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III

Review Art.17/12 Outcomes of the ad hoc group 1:

Carl Bro a/s - Team Leader - IPPC-experts - Quality Assurance

Population size units (Art. 17)

Expert Group on Reporting Nature Directives , Brussels

Report to WG GES on the Mediterranean MRUs and joint projects workshops 19th meeting WG GES 22 March 2018, Brussels.

EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook

Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 22/03/2012

Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process

EU Ecolabelling Board June 2015 Cross-cutting Issues

DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals

Review Art.17/12 Outcomes of the ad hoc group 1:

CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature

CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans 8 and 9 May 2006 Bonn

Review Art.17/12 for 2016 and onwards

Follow up of Article 17 Report

Progress in the designation of Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)

15th meeting of MSCG, 9 February 2015, Brussels

Adaptations to the reporting formats identified so far

Measuring progress towards Target 1

Preparatory Workshop of the Pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Seminar

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.

Assessment of Conservation Status for Large Carnivores

WG GES: Decision review progress

RECOGNIZING NATURA 2000 BENEFITS AND DEMONSTRATING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CONSERVATION MEASURES Progress meeting EC 16 May 2011 Johan Lammerant.

Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005

Review plan of the nature reporting – update 6

Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011

Favourable Reference Values - reporting guidelines

HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas

PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI

Natura 2000 Seminars New Biogeographical Process

Ad hoc group on favourable reference values, overview of activities

Aim: To be able to describe the general rule for a sequence

Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011

WG C-1 activity Berlin – 3 May 2007

INSPIRE & Art.17/12 reporting

The New Biogeographic Process General info – December 2011

ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES

WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

New Biogeographic process

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate

Review of Decision 2010/477/EU and MSFD Annex III

EU Water Framework Directive

EU biodiversity strategy to Target 1

Partcipants - presentations

Natura 2000 and Forests A new guidance document

Zelmira Gaudillat – ETC/BD Carlos Romão - EEA

Presentation transcript:

Favourable Reference Values 16th Meeting Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 16 March 2015

Aim of this discussion on Favourable Reference Values Improve current guidelines (Further) harmonise approaches of Member States Identify operational terms of reference for an ad hoc group 1st meeting of ad hoc: 2 June (Brussels)

Main points raised so far Most difficult values to assess General guidance not useful: too much variability across habitats & species and countries Reaching FRV may be unattainable Develop an EU-biogeographical approach to set FRVs? Particularly for wide ranging species?

How to improve guidance? More prescriptive? Develop common rules to simplify assessments? Develop ‘decision trees’? E.g. Favourable reference range (BE-Wallonie) Further define role of potential / historical / actual range, area, population (see BE-Wallonie text)

How to improve guidance? Develop EU biogeographical FRVs for certain species groups? Wide-ranging: terrestrial & marine Further guidance on use of population viability analysis, namely minimum viable population