City of Rehoboth Beach Water and Wastewater Financial and Rates Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
Advertisements

Proposed Water & Sewer Rates FY2014 Department of Utilities & General Services April 1,
Sanitary Sewer System Rate Study September 2012 Keystone Municipal Services.
City of Clinton Fiscal Year 2013 Sewer Rate Recommendations Committee of the Whole April 24, 2012.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Municipal & Financial Services Group Water and Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements and Rates Workshop April 18, 2012 King George County Service Authority.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
2013 City Budget Manhattan ~ Kansas Work Session Two.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Page: Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast Council Presentation City of Cottonwood July 2009.
Finance Committee Meeting Water Rate Study Update Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager August 13, 2012.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Fiscal Committee Recommendations 2016 & 2017 Repair & Replacement Reserve Funding Amounts July 2015.
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
Nassau-Amelia Utilities FY 2008 Utility Rate Study Presented by: Andrew J. Burnham July 9, 2007 Nassau-Amelia Utilities.
Town of Genoa October 6, Agenda Why are we here? Background Capacity Analysis & Facilities Plan Preferred Alternative Board Direction Implementation.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
Borrego Water District Revenue Workshop. Potential Revenue Sources  Background  Service Area Relatively Small  Largely Undeveloped  Absentee Owners.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Sewer Rate Evaluation Wareham, Massachusetts January 14, 2014 Michael J. Schrader, P.E.
RATE ANALYSIS FY FY 2019 March 6, 2014 CARSON VALLEY WATER UTILITY FUND 326 – DEPARTMENT 864.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
FY 2010 Budget Slide 1 Public Works March 18, 2009 Wastewater User Fees Wastewater Collection Proposed RCO Fee Surcharge Recommendation: Regional Consent.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
FY 2016 Water & Sewer Rates Presented by: The Department of Public Works Works.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Sr. Vice President Eric Grau - Project Consultant Presented by: Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water.
Water Rate Presentation City Council Meeting December 14, 2010.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Global Service Provider Buildings Energy Environment Transportation Water Water and Wastewater Rate Study Village of Villa Park, Illinois Presented to.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2015 / 16 First Quarter Enterprise Performance Measures Update John Ward Director of Engineering.
Approval of FY-2016 Capital Budget and the 10-Year Capital Plan February 11, 2015.
FY 2017 BudgetHearing September 8, 2016 Mike Loftin, Assistant City Manager - Finance 1.
CSA 7 – Boulder Creek. YOUR SANITATION FACILITY Facility Includes the Following Five Pump Stations –Total of 10 pumps 16,553 feet of collection lines.
Current Water Rates $26.66 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $80.00) 5.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used The City of Flushing.
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Water and Wastewater Rates
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Town of Broadway Fiscal Year 2018 Budget May 2, 2017.
Final Rate Study Findings
City of Rialto Midyear Changes Budget-Fiscal Year 2012/2013
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
Joshua Basin Water District Draft Findings & Rate Scenarios
Large User True-up Process
Water and Sewer Rate Study
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
City of Fernley City Council Meeting
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Idyllwild Water District
SEWER DEPARTMENT BUDGET WORKSHOP
Solid Waste Department Rate Stabilization Plan Recommendation
City of Santa Paula Water and Sewer Rate Study Results Public Workshop
Presentation transcript:

City of Rehoboth Beach Water and Wastewater Financial and Rates Review The Abrahams Group November 5, 2018

Study Objectives – Water and Wastewater Review recent financial results. Project revenues over the next five fiscal years (FY19-FY23). Project operating expenditures over the next five fiscal years (FY19- FY23). Understand the City’s planned capital improvements, including those recommended by the City’s engineering consultant. Include projected expenditures related to the capital improvements, if funded via borrowings and if funded via outlay. Determine rate changes needed to ensure the funds operate in surplus.

Water Fund Review – User Background The City has 5,950 users that are billed for their water usage, broken down as: 2,850 in Rehoboth Beach 200 in Breezewood 2,900 outside of Rehoboth Beach The City also bills Dewey Beach for its water usage. User charges revenue using recent one-year actuals for each is broken down as: Rehoboth Beach – $680,000 (28%) Breezewood – $40,000 (2%) Outside of Rehoboth Beach – $1.1 million (45%) Dewey Beach – $610,000 (25%)

Water Fund Review – Financial Actuals Recent financial actuals: The City has maintained a yearly surplus recently due, in part, to: A rate increase in the recent past Consumption up 45 million units since 2012 and an average of 2.6% yearly Manageable debt of about $347,000 per year (or about 18% of latest budget) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Revenues $2,234,065 $2,274,143 $2,239,863 $2,607,569 $2,616,549 $2,764,771 Total Expenditures $1,504,415 $1,669,248 $1,949,558 $1,946,278 $2,077,823 $1,928,694 Surplus/(Deficit) $729,650 $604,895 $290,305 $661,291 $538,726 $836,077

Water Fund Review – Capital Improvements The City plans to undertake a large capital improvement program that will, if funded, greatly increase annual expenditures. The capital plan includes equipment purchases, water main replacement and repairs, additional capital projects, and distribution system improvements. Completing the plan will require increased water rates to ensure sufficient water revenues to cover water expenditures. Two options are included in the analysis: Fund capital improvements through borrowings Fund capital improvements through capital outlay

Water Fund Review – Capital Improvements Items in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (FY19 to FY23): Replacement Vehicle (#36 Ford Transit) for $6,540 in FY 2019 Replacement Vehicle (#32 Ford F350) for $16,798 in FY 2019 SCADA Upgrades for $25,000 in FY 2021 Backhoe Replacement for $125,000 in FY 2022 Census Reading Equipment for $70,000 in FY 2023 Recommendations from City’s engineering consultant: FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Repair and Rehab $68,364 $34,343 $228,527 $144,318 $81,527 Capital Projects $313,750 $803,250 $569,500 $341,600 Distribution System $163,500 $573,500 $513,500 Total $231,864 $921,593 $1,545,277 $1,227,318 $936,627

Water Fund Review – Financial Projections, if Borrowed Projections for next five fiscal years, if capital funded via borrowings: Assumptions include five-year averages for revenues, no rate changes, steady increases in expenditures, indirect costs, and additional expenditures to fund engineer’s recommended capital improvements: FY 2019 Budgeted FY 2019 Projected FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total Revenues $2,604,300 $2,443,429 Total Expenditures $1,962,708 $2,314,571 $2,326,726 $2,447,533 $2,655,823 $2,678,810 Surplus/(Deficit) $641,592 $128,858 $116,703 $(4,104) $(212,394) $(235,381) FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Additional Operating $181,864 $207,843 $200,658 $184,486 $154,037 Projected New Debt $14,275 $70,543 $146,740 $205,311

Water Fund Review – Rate Changes, if Borrowed The following rate changes are needed in order for projections to show a small surplus: The impact on the average users’ yearly bills is: FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rate Change 0.00% 5.00% Current FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Breezewood $228 $239 $251 $264 Rehoboth Beach $215 $226 $237 $249 Outside of City $339 $356 $374 $393

Water Fund Review – Financial Projections, if Outlay Projections for next five fiscal years, if capital funded via outlay: Assumptions include five-year averages for revenues, no rate changes, steady increases in expenditures, indirect costs, and additional expenditures to fund engineer’s recommended capital improvements: FY 2019 Budgeted FY 2019 Projected FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total Revenues $2,604,300 $2,443,429 Total Expenditures $1,962,708 $2,314,571 $3,026,201 $3,721,609 $3,551,916 $3,256,089 Surplus/(Deficit) $641,592 $128,858 $(582,772) $(1,278,180) $(1,108,487) $(812,660) FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Additional Operating $181,864 $207,843 $200,658 $184,486 $154,037 Capital Outlay $713,750 $1,344,619 $1,042,833 $782,590

Water Fund Review – Rate Changes, if Outlay The following rate changes are needed in order for projections to show a small surplus: The impact on the average users’ yearly bills is: The average yearly bill is based on the average usage on peak bills and non-peak bills for all users with one-inch meters in each area listed. FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rate Change 0.00% 30.00% 22.50% -5.00% -7.50% Current FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Breezewood $228 $296 $363 $345 $319 Rehoboth Beach $215 $279 $342 $325 $301 Outside of City $339 $441 $540 $513 $474

Wastewater Fund Review – User/Allocations Background The City has 2,800 Rehoboth Beach users that are billed for their wastewater flow. The bills contain a surcharge equal to 50% of the sewer charges on the bill. Based on the City’s Agreed-Upon Procedures, the City’s operating and capital items on the CIP are allocated to North Shores, Dewey Beach, Henlopen Acres, and, starting in FY 2021, Sussex County, based on each entity’s flow share. Based on an agreement, the City’s debt for the outfall and WWTP upgrades and expenditures for capital improvements recommended by the City’s engineering consultant are allocated to Dewey Beach at 37.5% and to Henlopen Acres at 4.5%. User charges and allocations revenue using recent one-year actuals for each is broken down as: Rehoboth Beach – $1.7 million (54%) North Shores – $335,000 (11%) Dewey Beach – $970,000 (32%) Henlopen Acres – $100,000 (3%)

Wastewater Fund Review – Financial Actuals Recent financial actuals: The City has maintained a yearly surplus recently due, in part, to: A rate increase in the recent past Steady flow from year to year Little debt of about $57,000 per year (or about 1% of latest budget) Allocations to other entities providing consistent revenues relative to expenditures FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Total Revenues $2,876,154 $2,594,812 $2,607,208 $2,788,466 $3,234,454 $3,828,123 Total Expenditures $1,920,135 $1,918,183 $2,497,251 $2,262,116 $2,703,034 $2,899,647 Surplus/(Deficit) $956,019 $676,629 $109,957 $526,350 $531,420 $928,475

Wastewater Fund Review – Capital Improvements The City plans to undertake a large capital improvement program that will, if funded, greatly increase annual expenditures. The capital plan includes equipment purchases, pump station and treatment plant repairs, collection system improvements, and pump station renewals. Completing the plan will require increased wastewater rates to ensure sufficient wastewater revenues to cover wastewater expenditures. Two options are included in the analysis: Fund capital improvements through borrowings Fund capital improvements through capital outlay

Wastewater Fund Review – Capital Improvements Items in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (FY19 to FY23): Replacement of Newbold Square Pump #1 for $13,000 in FY 2019 Replacement of Return Activated Sludge Pump #2 for $23,500 in FY 2019 Vehicle Replacement Truck (#42 F250) for $11,519 in FY 2019 Bucket Truck Replacement (#55 F450) for $38,526 in FY 2019 Sewer Vacuum Truck for $390,000 in FY 2020 Hickman Street Pump #1 for $15,000 in FY 2023 Recommendations from City’s engineering consultant: FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Pump Station and Treatment Plant $1,046,750 $2,346,320 $3,081,965 $1,619,528 $1,618,292 Collection System $108,470 $570,645 $494,803 $907,208 $445,033 Remaining Pump Station Renewals $7,986 $2,289 $83,299 $60,938 Total $1,163,206 $2,919,254 $3,660,067 $2,587,674 $2,063,325

Wastewater Fund Review – Financial Projections, if Borrowed Projections for next five fiscal years, if capital funded via borrowings: Assumptions include projected allocations, five-year averages for revenues, no rate changes, steady increases in expenditures, indirect costs, new debt for outfall and WWTP upgrades, and additional expenditures to fund engineer’s recommended capital improvements: FY 2019 Budgeted FY 2019 Projected FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total Revenues $3,502,904 $3,981,076 $4,252,793 $4,077,664 $4,163,879 $4,273,026 Total Expenditures $4,125,451 $4,522,088 $5,180,471 $4,902,421 $5,039,708 $5,209,360 Surplus/(Deficit) $(622,547) $(541,012) $(927,678) $(824,757) $(875,829) $(936,335) FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Additional Operating $116,456 $110,759 $115,927 $93,566 $32,628 Projected New Debt $9,244 $52,221 $151,402 $294,665

Wastewater Fund Review – Rate Changes, if Borrowed The following rate changes, which impact one quarter of bills in FY 2019, are needed in order for projections to show a small surplus by FY 2020: The impact on the average users’ yearly bills is: The average yearly bill is based on the average usage on peak bills and non-peak bills for all users with one-inch meters. The bill amounts include the sewer surcharge for infrastructure improvement, which is 50% of the sewer charges on the bill. FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rate Change 60.00% 0.00% Current FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rehoboth Beach $581 $623 $930

Wastewater Fund Review – Financial Projections, if Outlay Projections for next five fiscal years, if capital funded via outlay: Assumptions include projected allocations, five-year averages for revenues, no rate changes, steady increases in expenditures, indirect costs, new debt for outfall and WWTP upgrades, and additional expenditures to fund engineer’s recommended capital improvements: FY 2019 Budgeted FY 2019 Projected FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Total Revenues $3,502,904 $3,981,076 $4,320,611 $4,468,624 $4,953,953 $4,939,679 Total Expenditures $4,125,451 $4,522,088 $5,633,402 $6,048,019 $7,382,414 $6,945,393 Surplus/(Deficit) $(622,547) $(541,012) $(1,312,792) $(1,579,395) $(2,428,461) $(2,005,714) FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Additional Operating $116,456 $110,759 $115,927 $93,566 $32,628 Capital Outlay $462,175 $1,197,820 $2,494,108 $2,030,697

Wastewater Fund Review – Rate Changes, if Outlay The following rate changes, which impact one quarter of bills in FY 2019, are needed in order for projections to show a small surplus by FY 2020: The impact on the average users’ yearly bills is: The average yearly bill is based on the average usage on peak bills and non-peak bills for all users with one-inch meters. The bill amounts include the sewer surcharge for infrastructure improvement, which is 50% of the sewer charges on the bill. FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rate Change 80.00% 0.00% 10.00% 25.00% -10.00% Current FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Rehoboth Beach $581 $637 $1,046 $1,151 $1,438 $1,294

Wastewater Fund Review – Treatment Plant Background Since FY 2010, the City has collected surcharges on customers’ wastewater bills to help cover costs for infrastructure improvements. The City cannot reserve its unused treatment plant capacity due to physical location limits, but Sussex County has the ability to add additional users to tap into that unused capacity. If the County were to take over operations of the treatment plant: The County can rely on staff readily available to maintain and operate plant. The County can leverage its ability to hire contractors with technological advantages to help keep project costs down. The County can leverage its higher debt capacity to keep annual costs down. The County would assume the debt for the Outfall project and treatment plant upgrades. The County can leverage its ability to bring on additional customers, spreading costs across a larger user base. Customers in Dewey Beach, Henlopen Acres, North Shores, and the City would welcome a lower cost alternative.

Decision Points Expenditure projections provided include the complete funding of the engineer’s recommended capital improvements. Is this the City’s plan? If it is, will those improvements be funded via borrowing or via outlay? If it is not, the projections are overstated. Is the City interested in adopting a water rate change plan for the next few years to raise enough revenue to cover projected expenditures? Is the City interested in adopting a wastewater rate change plan, with an immediate rate change, to raise enough revenue to cover projected expenditures? Is the City interested in exploring other wastewater options, like not continuing to operate the treatment plant, to avoid large rate increases in the near future?

Thank You Questions and Answers