WRF modelling of Flight B989 20th Oct 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
Advertisements

Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.
Comparison of depositing and non-depositing processes for atmospheric transport modeling of radionuclides Methods Background & Aims Numerous atmospheric.
ICARTT J31 Data Workshop March 9, 2005, NOAA Aeronomy Lab, Boulder Particle dispersion modeling with FLEXPART: possibilities for J31 Andreas Stohl Norwegian.
Validation of WRF and WRF LES Simulations of the Dispersal of Ground-generated AgI Nuclei Xia Chu 1, Lulin Xue 2, Bart Geerts 1, Bruce Boe 3, Roy Rasmussen.
ANALYSIS OF TRACER DATA FROM URBAN DISPERSION EXPERIMENTS Akula Venkatram and Vlad Isakov  Motivation for Field Experiments  Field Studies Conducted.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Passive Measurements of Rain Rate in Hurricanes Ruba A.Amarin CFRSL December 10, 2005.
Coupled NMM-CALMET Meteorology Development for the CALPUFF Air Dispersion Modelling in Complex Terrain and Shoreline Settings Presented at: European Geoscience.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
      Brian A. Colle*, Yanluan Lin*, Justin B. Wolfe*, W. James David E. Kingsmill +, Mark Stoelinga, and Chris Woods # *Stony Brook.
Ozone and Aerosols in US and East Asia between 2001 and 2002 Yun-Fat Lam 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Zuopan Li 1, Carey Jang 2, Rokjin Park 3 and Daniel J. Jacob.
This is the footer Modelling of deep convective clouds and orographic triggering of convection during the COPS experiment Ralph Burton,
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
S. Maksyutov, P.K. Patra and M. Ishizawa Jena; 13 May 2003 TDI experiment with NIES model and interannually varying NCEP winds.
Part 4: Local scale dispersion calculation
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.
Template U.S. EPA’s Evaluation of Long Range Transport Models Ralph E. Morris ENVIRON International Corporation A&WMA CPANS Conference University of Calgary.
Photo by Dave Fratello. Focus To evaluate CAM5/CARMA at 1x1 degree resolution with aircraft observations. - Improve cirrus cloud representation in the.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
BRAVO Back-Trajectory Analyses Why Consider ATAD? History of use at Big Bend - How Good is our past? History of comparison to other wind fields. ATAD vs.
Tracer Simulation and Analysis of Transport Conditions Leading to Tracer Impacts at Big Bend Bret A. Schichtel ( NPS/CIRA.
« Data assimilation in isentropic coordinates » Which Accuracy can be achieved using an high resolution transport model ? F. FIERLI (1,2), A. HAUCHECORNE.
The TRIMREX Field Project: An OSSE Study Shu-Hua Chen /UC Davis This work is supported by NTFRI and NSC in Taiwan Other contributors: Jhih-Ying Chen (NCU),
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
Recent plume modelling work – NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian In the following, WRF has been configured with a “volcano” represented.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
CCAM Regional climate modelling Dr Marcus Thatcher Research Scientist December 2007.
High resolution simulation of August 1 AMMA case: impact of soil moisture initial state on the PBL dynamics and comparison with observations. S. Bastin.
Global Observing System Simulation Experiments (Global OSSEs) How It Works Nature Run 13-month uninterrupted forecast produces alternative atmosphere.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
35 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Example Simulations Presented on the following slides are several basic trajectory and dispersion simulations and meteorological.
Page 1© Crown copyright Aircraft observations of mineral dust.
1 1 Slide © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Mesoscale Simulation of a Convective Frontal Passage Travis Swaggerty, Dorothea Ivanova and Melanie Wetzel Department of Applied Aviation Sciences Embry-Riddle.
© University of Reading 2008www.reading.ac.ukTTISS September 2009 Impact of targeted dropsondes on European forecasts Emma Irvine Sue Gray and John Methven.
BAe-146 GV Global Hawk CAST flight planning and analysis using NAME- Jan-Feb 2013 Neil Harris, Michal Filus, Matt Ashfold, Alistair Manning and John Pyle.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
Snapshots of WRF activities in the GFI/Iceland groups.
INUPIAQ/CLACE 2014 University of Manchester Data availability.
Part 5: Advanced Trajectories
A. Morrow, R. V. Martin, S. Sharma, L. Huang, A. Herber, R. Leaitch, J. Burkehart, S. M. Li, and P. Liu NETCARE Workshop November 4 th 2014 Understanding.
35 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Example Simulations Presented on the following slides are several basic trajectory and dispersion simulations and meteorological.
16-1 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Workshop Agenda Introduction to HYSPLIT Introduction.ppt Model Overview Model_Overview.ppt Meteorological Data Meteorological_Data.ppt.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
CLARIFY-2016 Cloud characterisation and aerosol-cloud-interaction flight planning Steven Abel, 29 th February 2016, Birmingham.
JFJ 2013 Aim: to identify the best upwind site for the 2014 campaign P. Connolly Centre for Atmospheric Science.
Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gases breakout session NACP Science Team meeting 18 February 2009.
Ship emission effect on Houston Ship Channel CH2O concentration ——study with high resolution model Ye Cheng.
B3. Microphysical Processes
Michael Naughton, Wenming Lu
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Development of a high resolution planetary boundary layer height analysis system using aircraft, radiosonde, and NYS mesonet profiler data and the analysis.
Chemical histories of pollutant plumes in East Asia:
Overview of Deterministic Computer Models
HWRF Initialization Overview
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
WRF Modelling of Volcanic Ash Dispersion
Convective and orographically-induced precipitation study
RAINEX briefing at the NOAA AOC in Tampa
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
B913.
WRF modelling of Flight B989 20th Oct 2016
Real-time WRF EnKF 36km outer domain/4km nested domain D1 (36km)
I. What? ~ II. Why? ~ III. How? Modelling volcanic plumes with WRF
Start Hot-Start Section
High-resolution simulations of the spread of volcanic gases
Presentation transcript:

WRF modelling of Flight B989 20th Oct 2016 ….cont’d […WRF initialised with 0.5 degree NCEP GFS analyses 33 tracers added Simulation start (and tracer release): 06Z 20th Oct. Simulation end time: 0Z 19th Oct. 400 m resolution, 50 vertical levels. Underlying orography is USGS 30 arc-second. Run on ARCHER 512 processors ~ real time…]

WRF modelling of Flight B989 20th Oct 2016 …continued

FAAM Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

WRF At each aircraft measurement point (lat / lon / altitude) Interpolate from WRF output to get corresponding WRF concentration i.e. 3-D interpolation (quite time-consuming)

Comparison with observations WRF Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

Comparison with observations FAAM Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

WRF Slight difference in bearing. Modelled centre of plume ~ 1.5 km from that observed.

WRF modelling of Flight B987 18th Oct 2016 As before… WRF initialised with 0.5 degree NCEP GFS analyses 33 tracers added (see below) Simulation start (and tracer release): 06Z 18th Oct. Simulation end time: 0Z 21st Oct. 400 m resolution, 50 vertical levels. Underlying orography is USGS 30 arc-second.

All sources

All sources

FAAM Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

WRF Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

FAAM Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

WRF Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

FAAM Comparison with observations: assume Katla West is only source Where is this coming from? FAAM Katla West: range rings every 2 k m

FAAM OBS & WRF WINDS

10 m 100 m GFS winds

HYSPLIT Backwards dispersion Init. 16Z Current plot for 04Z

Results would appear to suggest there is another source E.g. Grimsvotn?? - Is there “industry” upstream? GRIMSVOTN (TRACER # 9)

Results for 08Z, 10Z, 12Z, 14Z, 16Z are online (1230 plots!) http://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~lecrrb/Iceland_tracer/b987/ and subdirectories. Filenames e.g. trac_all_0030_2016-10-18_06:00:00 all volcanoes level (m AGL) date time (GMT) i.e. summation trac_01_0030_2016-10-18_06:00:00 volcano number 01