(b) (a) Figure 1: Phase space portraits of the weakly chaotic kicked rotor with stochasticity parameter K = 2 (a), and of the strongly chaotic kicked.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1Fig. 11.1, p.337. Slide 2Fig. 11.2, p.338.
Advertisements

Slide 1Fig. 19.1, p Slide 2Fig. 19.2, p. 583.
Slide 1Fig. 21.1, p.641. Slide 2Fig. 21.2, p.642.
Slide 1Fig. 10.1, p.293. Slide 2Fig. 10.1a, p.293.
Slide 1Fig. 5.1, p.113. Slide 2Fig. 5.1a, p.113 Slide 3Fig. 5.1b, p.113.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
D.R. Grempel, R.E. Prange and S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. A, 29, 1639 (1984); Figure 1: Two quasi-energy eigenstates obtained numerically. Quasi- energies are.
THIS LECTURE single From single to coupled oscillators.
Transport in Chaotic Systems and Fingerprints of Pseudorandomness Shmuel Fishman Como, March 2009.
Fractional Dynamics of Open Quantum Systems QFTHEP 2010 Vasily E. Tarasov Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow
Semi-classics for non- integrable systems Lecture 8 of “Introduction to Quantum Chaos”
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 09 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
THE ANDERSON LOCALIZATION PROBLEM, THE FERMI - PASTA - ULAM PARADOX AND THE GENERALIZED DIFFUSION APPROACH V.N. Kuzovkov ERAF project Nr. 2010/0272/2DP/ /10/APIA/VIAA/088.
Introduction to Quantum Chaos
Chaotic motion in the double pendulum Dan Hampton and Wolfgang Christian Abstract The double pendulum provides an ideal system in which to study chaotic.
Pavel Stránský Complexity and multidiscipline: new approaches to health 18 April 2012 I NTERPLAY BETWEEN REGULARITY AND CHAOS IN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.
Jalani F. Kanem 1, Samansa Maneshi 1, Matthew Partlow 1, Michael Spanner 2 and Aephraim Steinberg 1 Center for Quantum Information & Quantum Control, Institute.
Random Variables (1) A random variable (also known as a stochastic variable), x, is a quantity such as strength, size, or weight, that depends upon a.
QUANTUM CHAOS : QUANTUM CHAOS Glows at Sunset
QUANTUM CHAOS : Last Glows at Sunset QUANTUM CHAOS.
V.V. Emel’yanov, S.P. Kuznetsov, and N.M. Ryskin* Saratov State University, , Saratov, Russia * GENERATION OF HYPERBOLIC.
PHYS208 - Lecture Thursday 4. February 2010
Analyzing Stability in Dynamical Systems
Deterministic Dynamics
PHY 745 Group Theory 11-11:50 AM MWF Olin 102 Plan for Lecture 36:
OSE801 Engineering System Identification Spring 2010
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Blair Ebeling MATH441: Spring 2017
Coarsening dynamics Harry Cheung 2 Nov 2017.
Computational Data Analysis
Dynamical Models - Purposes and Limits
Various Symbols for the Derivative
Todays Agenda 1. Filter Transfer function Orders of filter
Systems of Linear First-Order Differential Equations
Anisotropy Induced by Macroscopic Boundaries: Surface-Normal Mapping using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging  Evren Özarslan, Uri Nevo, Peter J. Basser  Biophysical.
Introduction to linear Lie groups Examples – SO(3) and SU(2)
Stability and Dynamics in Fabry-Perot cavities due to combined photothermal and radiation-pressure effects Francesco Marino1,4, Maurizio De Rosa2, Francesco.
Lecture 17: Kinetics and Markov State Models
A method of determining the existence of bursting solutions, and output variables such as burst length and spike number, of multidimensional models using.
Term projects.
Dots 5 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Dots 5 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Dots 2 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Chaos Synchronization in Coupled Dynamical Systems
Nuclear Forces - Lecture 3 -
Single-Cell Analysis of Growth in Budding Yeast and Bacteria Reveals a Common Size Regulation Strategy  Ilya Soifer, Lydia Robert, Ariel Amir  Current.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures Second Edition Figures of Chapter 3 Mathias Weske.
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Dots 3 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Dots 6 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Order from Chaos: Single Cell Reprogramming in Two Phases
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
FIG. 7. Simulated edge localized mode magnetization and phase distributions at the 2.4 GHz resonance (top panels) and 3.6 GHz resonance (bottom panels)
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Dots 2 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Dots 4 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods
Distinct Quantal Features of AMPA and NMDA Synaptic Currents in Hippocampal Neurons: Implication of Glutamate Spillover and Receptor Saturation  Yuri.
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Exploring the Complex Folding Kinetics of RNA Hairpins: I
Space group properties
Mechanical Communication Acts as a Noise Filter
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Dots 3 × TABLES MULTIPLICATION.
Kevin McHale, Andrew J. Berglund, Hideo Mabuchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
Emmanuel O. Awosanya, Alexander A. Nevzorov  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

(b) (a) Figure 1: Phase space portraits of the weakly chaotic kicked rotor with stochasticity parameter K = 2 (a), and of the strongly chaotic kicked rotor with K = 10 (b). S. Fishman and S. Rahav, Relaxation and Noise in Chaotic Systems, in Dynamics of Dissipation, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 597, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2002), Edited by P. Garbaczewski and R. Olkiewicz (Proceeding of “38 Winter School of Theoretical Physics: Dynamical Semigroups: Dissipation, Chaos, Quanta”, February 2002, Ladek, Poland)

Classical Accelerator Modes Figure 2: Phase portrait of the Standard map where (a) and (b) are sequences of island chains of the first and second generations, respectively, with periods 3 and 8 for K=K(1); (c) and (d) are the same as (a) and (b) for K=K(2) with period 5 for the first generation and 11 for the second one. A. Iomin, S. Fishman and G.M. Zaslavsky, Phys. Rev. E, 65, 036215 (2002)

Kicked Top Table 1: Eigenvalues of U(N) for t = 10.2 truncated at lmax = 30, 40, 50 and 60 J. Weber, F. Haake, P.A. Braun, C. Manderfeld and P. Seba, J. Phys. A 34, 7195 (2001).

Kicked Top Figure 3: The eigenfunctions corresponding to the eigenvalues 0.7696 (a), −0.3388±i0.6243 (b), −0.0058±i0.7080 (c), 0.6480 (d) of U(N) for t = 10.2, and lmax = 60. J. Weber, F. Haake, P.A. Braun, C. Manderfeld and P. Seba, J. Phys. A 34, 7195 (2001).

Kicked Top Figure 4: The decay of C(n) (dots) with ρ(0) corresponding to the eigenfunction shown in figure (b) of the previous slide. The numerical fit (line) yields a decay factor 0.7706. J. Weber, F. Haake, P.A. Braun, C. Manderfeld and P. Seba, J. Phys. A 34, 7195 (2001).

Kicked rotor Figure 5: The fast relaxation rates g for various functions f and g with k = 0 Figure 6: The diffusion coefficient D for K ≤ 20 M. Khodas, S.Fishman and O. Agam, Phys. Rev. E, 62, 4769 (2000). All the figures (except figure 2) and table can also be found at: S. Fishman and S. Rahav, Relaxation and Noise in Chaotic Systems, in Dynamics of Dissipation, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 597, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2002), Edited by P. Garbaczewski and R. Olkiewicz (Proceeding of “38 Winter School of Theoretical Physics: Dynamical Semigroups: Dissipation, Chaos, Quanta”, February 2002, Ladek, Poland).