For Workshop on Expert Testimony.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
Advertisements

MBA Mock Trial Program. What is a Mock Trial?  Trial before a real judge (or lawyer)  Held in real courtroom (State Court)  Examination of witnesses.
The Nature of Evidence A Guide to Legal Evidence & the Courts.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
FORENSIC SCIENTISTS, EXPERT TESTIMONY Notes 1.3. Objectives 1. Explain the role and responsibilities of the expert witness. 2. Compare and contrast the.
Tell the story better than the other side.. Opening Statements  This is like the introductory paragraph and thesis statement of an essay  This lays.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
UNDERSTANDING U.S. v. TEXAS & WHAT’S NEXT JUNE 23, 2016.
3 Simple Steps to Reading Scholarly Articles
All of us advocate every day when we try to influence other people’s decisions. The most successful advocates are those who go the extra steps. They actually.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Emporia State University
Debate Immigration.
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
International Consultations Breadth and Depth
Post-Conviction Discovery And Funds
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
AF1: Thinking Scientifically
Research Methods in Crime and Justice
I. Why You Might Be Called
The Jury System.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
The “DOs” and Exaggerated “DON’Ts” of Mock Trial
The “DOs” and Exaggerated “DON’Ts” of Mock Trial
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Bellwork What two amendments preserve the rights for all citizens a jury trial- (both civil and criminal cases)? If called to jury duty, do YOU think you.
Citizenship.
Judicial reform and its influence on competition development
The NICE Citizens Council and the role of social value judgements
Bellringer Executive Branch Review
The basics of every objection allowed in a Mock Trial.
Bioethics.
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
Legal Writing and Written Advocacy
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Socratic Seminar “I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.” - Socrates.
ROBBERY VICTIM AND LINEUP PHOTOGRAPH
Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement April 2018
Testing Hypotheses about Proportions
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
Repeated or super-expert examination.
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Hailey Mooney Data Services Coordinator and Social Sciences Librarian
HEARSAY DEFINITIONS [RULE 801, PARED DOWN].
Do I Have a RIGHT?.
Chapter 1 Section 1 What is Science?
Why?. Why? Why? If you don’t, the assumption is you don’t care or that you are satisfied with the status quo. If you don’t speak for our children,
University of Miskolc Faculty of Law
Opinion Testimony, In General
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Undocumented Students
Witnesses’ Roles in a Case
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Get Started Immediately!
Workshop for LME Residents
CPI & CM Case Practice Lab
BRIEFING A CASE.
Building Health Skills
Rules of Evidence and Objections
The Inquisitorial System
All of us advocate every day when we try to influence other people’s decisions. The most successful advocates are those who go the extra steps. They actually.
[The Process of Conducting Research] Chapter 1
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Business Law Final Exam
Stirling Bryan, PhD Scientific Director, BC SUPPORT Unit
Presentation transcript:

Expert Testimony and Social Science (including Case Study and Qualitative Methods) For Workshop on Expert Testimony. Immigration Mini Conference, University of Pennsylvania. 8-10-18. Prof Robert Smith, Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch Colllege, and Sociology Department, Graduate Center, CUNY

Prior Experience as Expert Testified in deportation cases -- 25 years. Testified in Wrongful Death Cases, including for an undocumented youth, pre DACA Testified in Voting Rights Trial US v Port Chester 2007. Consulted on other cases. Under-recognized venue for putting our skills as social scientists to work.

Social Scientists say people pay attention better with images.

Rob Smith in Action in Court

Immigration Court Testimony Equity in Case Comes from Harm (Extreme Unusual Harm) to a US Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident, not to the deportee. Eg, harm to USC child, if their father is deported, OR if they have to go back to Mexico (or other country).

Standards for Scientific Analysis using Social Science Analysis. Spirit of Daubert obtains, but more flexibility Can use hearsay evidence, knowledge of country etc. Key resonance: Judge’s decisions are Case Studies, so experts should do a Case Study of the case. Expert must be established academic, and be methodologically and epistemically strong. Defend scholarly work and declaration. Why did not you run alternative scenarios? Why can’t you calculate an error rate?

Don’t Do This.

Equity in Immigration Court Hearings Country Conditions, broadly interpreted, but analyzed with respect to the specific case. Kidnapping threat; why a target? Immigrant Family System, understood well enough to make an argument about how alternative scenarios would affect USC kids or USC wife? Must be INCORPORATED into analysis of that specific case.

Make the Case for the Case Cases are made stronger by Case Study Methods -- First Step: deep case knowledge, re country and family. -- Draw on all relevant literature (eg medicine, psych, etc) for the case. -- Draw on appropriate, reliable sources, US or Mexican (home country) census, public docs, news reports. -- Web offers access to local news, including w photos. -- Tie country conditions to specific stories in person’s history, as facts allow: kidnapping in Mexico of returned migrants. -- Draw on your local knowledge and scholarly expertise.

Talk to others with more knowledge of case, as you would in a case study USE Doctors’ and Teachers’ expertise to help make case. -- usually more open to professor than lawyer calling them; can write letters after. Draw on your colleagues’ work to make the case -- Jeremy Slack: generous role model Consult Experts or even government officials in home country re threats, etc, as appropiate.

Consider Alternatives the judge and opposing counsel may ask about If the respondent is deported, and his family stays behind  what harm to USC? If the respondent is deported and USC family goes with him what harm? What specifics of the case resonate with larger societal or other processes? Underlines the need to get thorough family and respondent history, and ask about issues you know about from your research (kidnapping etc). Often, lawyers do not know to ask (or how to ask) re key issues that can strengthen case (rosestatus). Know Lawyer’s strategy; practice testimony if possible.

Expert Testimony – under-recognized way to use social scientific skills. Thank you.