Interpretation of a BMP Activity Gradient in Drosophila Embryos Depends on Synergistic Signaling by Two Type I Receptors, SAX and TKV  Minh Nguyen, Sangbin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Advertisements

Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Phani Kurada, Kristin White  Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
D-cbl, a Negative Regulator of the Egfr Pathway, Is Required for Dorsoventral Patterning in Drosophila Oogenesis  Li-Mei Pai, Gail Barcelo, Trudi Schüpbach 
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (February 2001)
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Direct and Long-Range Action of a DPP Morphogen Gradient
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Control of Fat Storage by a Drosophila PAT Domain Protein
Shaping BMP Morphogen Gradients through Enzyme-Substrate Interactions
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (August 1996)
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Repulsive Axon Guidance
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Hedgehog Movement Is Regulated through tout velu–Dependent Synthesis of a Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan  Inge The, Yohanns Bellaiche, Norbert Perrimon 
Victor Hatini, Stephen DiNardo  Molecular Cell 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Stephen A. Thacker, Peter C. Bonnette, Robert J. Duronio 
Eric J. Rulifson, Chi-Hwa Wu, Roel Nusse  Molecular Cell 
Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Complementary and Combinatorial Functions of Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs  Margaret.
Qiong Wang, Mirka Uhlirova, Dirk Bohmann  Developmental Cell 
Ruth Grosskortenhaus, Frank Sprenger  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila sickle Is a Novel grim-reaper Cell Death Activator
Use of dsRNA-Mediated Genetic Interference to Demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 Act in the Wingless Pathway  Jason R Kennerdell, Richard W Carthew 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages (June 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
Facilitated Transport of a Dpp/Scw Heterodimer by Sog/Tsg Leads to Robust Patterning of the Drosophila Blastoderm Embryo  Osamu Shimmi, David Umulis,
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 1999)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Trimeric G Protein-Dependent Frizzled Signaling in Drosophila
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Petros Ligoxygakis, Siegfried Roth, Jean-Marc Reichhart 
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Zhenyu Zhang, Leslie M. Stevens, David Stein  Current Biology 
Novel Functions of nanos in Downregulating Mitosis and Transcription during the Development of the Drosophila Germline  Girish Deshpande, Gretchen Calhoun,
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Spatial Regulation of Developmental Signaling by a Serpin
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Transducing the Dpp Morphogen Gradient in the Wing of Drosophila
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Interpretation of a BMP Activity Gradient in Drosophila Embryos Depends on Synergistic Signaling by Two Type I Receptors, SAX and TKV  Minh Nguyen, Sangbin Park, Guillermo Marqués, Kavita Arora  Cell  Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 495-506 (November 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7

Figure 1 Nonreciprocal Relationship of SCW and DPP Signaling in the Embryo (A) Lateral view of a wild-type embryo at stage 15 stained to visualize a P[Kr-lacZ] amnioserosa reporter expressed in ∼200 cells in the dorsal midbody region. The segmental staining is derived from a P[wg-lacZ] insert in this embryo. In all figures, embryos are oriented anterior to the left and dorsal side up, unless stated otherwise. (B) Amnioserosa is absent in Df(2L)OD16 embryo lacking the scw gene. (C) Injections of SCW (0.5 μg/μl) into scw− embryos resulted in induction of amnioserosa and complete rescue of the ventralized morphology. Injection of SCW into dppH48 null embryos at the same (D) or a 10-fold higher concentration (data not shown) did not induce amnioserosa. (E–H) Embryos derived from parents of the genotype Df(2L)OD16, P[Kr-lacZ]/CyO, P[hb-lacZ], were injected with different concentration of DPP. The P[hb-lacZ] pattern enabled the distinction between scw− (0× SCW) and hemizygous (1× SCW) embryos. Injected embryos were classified into five categories based on the magnitude of their response. The data are represented graphically in (H). No amnioserosa, open bar; <wild-type amounts of amnioserosa, vertical stippled bar (see 1E); wild-type amounts of amnioserosa, gray bar; >wild-type amounts of amnioserosa—polar, horizontal stippled bar (see 1F); >wild-type amounts of amnioserosa—circumferential, closed bar (see 1G). Injection of 9 ng/μl DPP induced relatively small patches of amnioserosa in scw null embryos (E). Moderate levels of DPP (30 ng/μl) caused an expansion of amnioserosa, but a majority of the embryos retained dorsoventral polarity (F). At higher concentrations, the scw− embryos differentiated amnioserosa all around the circumference (G). Injection of DPP resulted in a dose-dependent response in both 0× SCW and 1× SCW embryos (H). However, the magnitude of the response at a given concentration of DPP was distinctly higher in the 1× SCW embryos. Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 2 Ventrally Expressed SCW Can Restore Dorsal-Most Cell Fates in scw Mutant Embryos (A) Lateral view of a scw null embryo at blastoderm stage, derived from a Df(2L)OD16/CyO, P[wg-lacZ] stock carrying a P[twi>SCW] transgene. The embryo was hybridized with an antisense riboprobe for detecting scw transcripts. The twi promoter restricts scw cDNA expression to the ventral-most 12–14 cells. Two copies of the P[twi>SCW] transgene drive expression at levels comparable to wild-type scw expression. (B) Dorsal view of a stage 15 embryo of the same genotype as in (A) stained with an anti-KR antibody to detect amnioserosa. scw− embryos carrying two or more copies of the P[twi>SCW] transgene differentiate amnioserosa cells in their correct dorsal position. (C) A moderately ventralized cuticle from a Df(2L)OD16 homozygous embryo showing extended ventral denticle belts and retracted posterior abdominal segments. (D) scw null embryos rescued by the P[twi>SCW] transgene differentiated a relatively normal cuticle, including the filzkörper typical of dorsolateral cell fates. Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 3 The SAX Receptor Primarily Mediates SCW Activity, while TKV Is Required for Both DPP and SCW Signaling Lateral views of stage 15 scw null embryos stained to visualize a P[Kr-lacZ] amnioserosa reporter. Dorsal injections with 0.4 μg/μl of SCW (A) or 20 ng/μl of DPP (B) resulted in induction of near wild-type amounts of amnioserosa in 70%–80% of scw− embryos. Injection of 2 μg/μl of SAX-DN inhibited the response to SCW (C) but did not prevent induction of dorsal cell fates by DPP (D). Similar injections using TKV-DN (2 μg/μl) interfered with induction of amnioserosa fates by both SCW (E) and DPP (F; see Table 1B). Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 4 SCW and DPP Activity in the Wing Is Differentially Sensitive to Dominant-Negative Receptors and SOG (A) Phenotypes resulting from ectopic expression of UAS:SCW and UAS:DPP are compared with a wild-type wing. These wings serve as controls for (B–D). The A9:GAL4 line used in these experiments drives ubiquitous expression at high levels in wing imaginal discs. At late third instar stages, expression is enhanced in the dorsal wing pouch. All wings are from female flies reared at 25°C. Overexpression of SCW resulted in blistering and ectopic venation reminiscent of low levels of ectopic DPP. Strong expression of DPP caused overgrowth of discs but resulted in small and blistered adult wings characterized by pigmentation and hairs typical of vein tissue. (B) Expression of two copies of UAS:SAX-DN in a wild-type background resulted in narrow wings, partial loss of the longitudinal vein L5, and the posterior crossvein. Coexpression of a single copy of UAS:SAX-DN strongly suppressed the UAS:SCW phenotype but had no effect on the UAS:DPP phenotype. (C) Expression of two copies of UAS:TKV-DN resulted in partial loss of vein L4, while L2 began to merge with L3. Coexpression of a single copy of UAS:TKV-DN partially suppressed the ectopic SCW phenotype. However, signs of ectopic venation persisted, and the characteristic overgrowth of the posterior compartment was apparent. Suppression of the UAS:DPP phenotype by TKV-DN resulted in a wing morphology that is closer to wild type, both in size and appearance. (D) Expression of two copies of UAS:SOG resulted in loss of the posterior crossvein, a relatively mild phenotype with poor penetrance. Coexpression of a single copy of UAS:SOG resulted in strong suppression of the ectopic SCW phenotype to near wild type. Simultaneous expression of SOG was strikingly ineffective in suppressing the effects of UAS:DPP, even when four copies of UAS:SOG were used (data not shown). Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 5 The SAX and TKV Receptors Synergize to Induce Dorsal Cell Fates in the Embryo Lateral views of stage 15 dppH48 embryos stained to visualize a P[Kr-lacZ] amnioserosa reporter. While a majority of embryos injected with 1 μg/μl of TKV-A were below threshold (see Table 1C), injections with 15 μg/μl of TKV-A were sufficient to induce a small but significant amount of amnioserosa in 73% of the dpp− embryos (A). Injections of SAX-A in the same concentration range did not promote induction of amnioserosa in dpp− embryos (B). Coinjection with 3.75 μg/μl of TKV-A and 3.0 μg/μl SAX-A resulted in synergistic induction of amnioserosa in 92% of embryos lacking endogenous DPP activity, often in a circumferential manner (C; see Table 1C). Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 6 scw Is Epistatic to sog The dorsal expression of rho at blastoderm stage was used as a marker for examining the epistatic relationship between sog and scw. Embryos were hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled rho and lacZ antisense riboprobes. (A) Dorsal view of rho expression in a wild-type embryo. (B) sogYL26 embryos showed expansion of rho laterally. Dorsal expression of rho was lost in a scw− embryo (data not shown), as well as in a sogYL26; Df(2L)OD16 double mutant (C). Mutant embryos were unambiguously identified by the absence of lacZ inserts on the FM7 and CyO balancers. Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)

Figure 7 SOG Inhibits the Induction of Dorsal Cell Fates by SCW but Not DPP (A–C) Lateral views of stage 15 scw null embryos stained to visualize a P[Kr-lacZ] amnioserosa reporter. Injection of 0.4 μg/μl SCW resulted in induction of amnioserosa (A) that was effectively blocked by coinjection with 0.5 μg/μl SOG (B). In contrast, coinjection of SOG did not interfere with the ability of DPP (20 ng/μl) to induce amnioserosa (C). (D) Drosophila S2 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs to assay TLD-mediated cleavage of SOG in the presence of SCW ligand. The conditioned media were analyzed on an SDS-PAGE gel and the Western blot probed with an anti-FLAG polyclonal antibody (D-8) that recognizes the C-terminal tag in SOG. The level of expression of the individual proteins was verified independently (data not shown). Expression of SOG and TLD in the presence of the SCW ligand resulted in the generation of three distinct cleavage products of SOG (100 kDa, 25 kDa, and 16 kDa), and an occasional 45 kDa band at much lower intensity. Cell 1998 95, 495-506DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81617-7)