Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Digital Volume Pulse Correlates With Comorbidity in Patients With ESRD  Daniel Sollinger, MD, Markus G. Mohaupt, MD, Albina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commentary on ‘The DOPPS Practice Monitor for US Dialysis Care: Potential Impact of Recent Guidelines and Regulatory Changes on Management of Mineral.
Advertisements

Renal Function Testing
Peritoneal dialysis American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Gregory L. Hundemer, MD, MPH, Andrew Z. Fenves, MD, Kristy M
Hypertension in the hemodialysis patient and the “lag phenomenon”: insights into pathophysiology and clinical management  Uday M Khosla, MD, Richard J.
Quiz Page March 2008 American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Dorian Schatell, MS, Meg Wise, PhD, Kristi Klicko, CHES, Bryan N
Surviving the First Year of Peritoneal Dialysis: Enduring Hard Times
Association of Physical Activity and Renal Function in Subjects With and Without Metabolic Syndrome: A Review of the Third National Health and Nutrition.
Amir Said Alizadeh Naderi, MD, Biff F. Palmer, MD 
Impact of Comorbidities on Mortality in Managed Care Patients With CKD
Dialysis Facility Ownership and Epoetin Dosing in Hemodialysis Patients: A Dialysis Provider’s Perspective  J. Michael Lazarus, MD, Raymond M. Hakim,
Jan Havlin, MD, PhD, Karel Matousovic, DSc, Otto Schück, MD, DSc 
Quiz Page July 2009 American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Evaluation of the Potential Living Kidney Donor
Kidney Tattoos American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Focusing on Health Literacy Might Help Us Cross the Quality Chasm
Daniel E. Weiner, MD, MS  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Salt and Hypertension American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Karl D. Nolph, MD, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
The Use of N-of-1 Trials to Individualize Treatment in Patients With Renal Magnesium Wasting  Anneke P. Bech, MD, Jack F.M. Wetzels, MD, Hans Groenewoud,
Joseph A. Vassalotti, MD, Lesley A. Stevens, MD, MS, Andrew S
Hemoglobin Level and Transfusions in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis: Where the Rubber Meets the Road  Eduardo Lacson, MD, MPH, Franklin Maddux, MD 
Geriatrics American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Effect of Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation on Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Sepsis  George Thomas, MD, MPH, Ethan M. Balk, MD,
David C. Mendelssohn, MD, FRCPC, Jay B. Wish, MD 
Proteinuria and Other Urinary Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation: Why Are We Still Waiting for Godot?  Bertram L. Kasiske, MD  American Journal of Kidney.
Factors Influencing Route of Administration for Epoetin Treatment Among Hemodialysis Patients in the United States  Mae Thamer, PhD, Yi Zhang, DDS, MS,
Tariq Shafi, MBBS, MHS, Andrew S. Levey, MD, Lesley A
Hypertension in the hemodialysis patient and the “lag phenomenon”: insights into pathophysiology and clinical management  Uday M Khosla, MD, Richard J.
Elevated Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in a Patient With Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Hypophosphatemia  Casey L. Cotant, MD, Panduranga S. Rao, MD, DNB,
Andrew D. Howard, MD, Robin S. Howard, MA, Stuart L
A Decade After the KDOQI CKD Guidelines: A Perspective From Mexico
CPR 1.2.: Evaluation of Anemia in CKD
A Sweet Cause of Polyuria
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Quiz Page April 2008 American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Study Designs in Patient-Oriented Research
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Association of Vascular Disease Before Transplantation With Long-term Transplant and Patient Outcomes After Kidney.
Daniel T. Lackland, DrPH, David J.P. Barker, MD, PhD 
Erratum American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Sulfamethoxazole Crystalluria
Daniel E. Weiner, MD, MS, Mark J. Sarnak, MD, MS 
Lesley A. Stevens, MD, MS, Nicholas Stoycheff, MD 
Risk for Incident Renal Dialysis in a Managed Care Population
Long-term Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury: The Power and Pitfalls of Observational/Population-Based Studies  Charuhas V. Thakar, MD  American Journal.
Arnold S. Relman, MD, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Trial Quality in Nephrology: How Are We Measuring Up?
Removal of Dabigatran by Hemodialysis
Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Within the Dialysis Population: A Potentially Preventable Perfect Storm  David P. Calfee, MD, MS  American Journal of Kidney.
Making Music American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Erratum American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Kidney Failure Treatment: The Freedom to Choose
Hypertension and CKD: Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES),   Madhav V. Rao,
August Heidland, MD, Udo Bahner, MD, Spiros Vamvakas, MD 
In the Literature: Cognitive Impairment in Hemodialysis Patients
Achieving Fairness in Access to Kidney Transplant: A Work in Progress
Commentary on ‘The DOPPS Practice Monitor for US Dialysis Care: Potential Impact of Recent Guidelines and Regulatory Changes on Management of Mineral.
Five years is a long time, especially if you're a dean
James F. Winchester, MD, Thomas H. Hostetter, MD, Timothy W. Meyer, MD 
Supportive care for patients with renal disease: Time for action
This Month in AJKD American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Dialysis Research and N-of-1 Trials: Made for Each Other?
Quiz Page January 2010 American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Serum Leptin and Epoetin Sensitivity
Clinical Practice Recommendations For Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy
In Reply to ‘Plasma Clearance of Iohexol in Hemodialysis Patients Requires Prolonged Blood Sampling’  Tariq Shafi, MBBS, MHS, Andrew S. Levey, MD, Josef.
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy
Quiz page December 2003 American Journal of Kidney Diseases
This Month in AJKD American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Presentation transcript:

Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Digital Volume Pulse Correlates With Comorbidity in Patients With ESRD  Daniel Sollinger, MD, Markus G. Mohaupt, MD, Albina Wilhelm, MD, Dominik Uehlinger, MD, Felix J. Frey, MD, Ute Eisenberger, MD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases  Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 456-463 (September 2006) DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014 Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Calculation of SIDVP by using the DVP waveform. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Bland-Altman plot showing the difference between SIDVP minus PWV measurements as a function of the mean of both measurements. Dashed lines, mean difference ± SD; ▴, TX recipients; ■, HD patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 SIDVP as a function of age in (A) TX recipients and (B) HD patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 Residuals (ΔSIDVP) of SIDVP as a function of age in TX recipients and HD patients. Individual dots are the difference (residuals) between expected and actual SIDVP. The zero line represents the theoretically expected age-dependent value (SIexpect) derived from Fig 3 A and B. Dashed lines are given by the cutoff values of ± 0.7 m/s, as rationalized in Results. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Comorbid status and groups of residuals. Group 1, less than −0.7 m/s (11 HD patients, 11 TX recipients); group 2, +0.7 m/s or less and −0.7 m/s or greater (10 HD patients, 15 TX recipients); group 3, greater than +0.7 m/s (15 HD patients, 17 TX recipients); and group 4, SIDVP not measurable (12 HD patients, 3 TX recipients). American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 Receiver operating characteristic curves comparing SIDVP and PWV measurements for the group with high comorbid risk. Comparison of areas under the curves tended to be different (P = 0.08). Areas under the curve for SIDVP and PWV were 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.87) and 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80), respectively. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006 48, 456-463DOI: (10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.05.014) Copyright © 2006 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Terms and Conditions