Proposals for the Identification and Prioritisation of Candidate Priority Substances under the next Review Dean Leverett Graham Merrington.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.

Advertisements

Statistical Evaluation of Dissolution for Specification Setting and Stability Studies Fasheng Li Associate Director, Pharmaceutical Statistics Worldwide.

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.

Environmental Safety Case and Changes to Waste Acceptance Date: 25th April 2012 Dr Richard Cummings – LLWR ESC Project Manager Presentation to: Customer.

Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.

Project Cycle Management (PCM)

Evaluation of adaptation scenarios Follow-up committee meeting 6 October, Leuven.

European Commission, DG Environment Unit C.3: Chemicals REACH Key issues for the paper industry CEPI Open Seminar – European Paper Week 1 December 2005.

REACH Industry Update WERCS US User Group Meeting 2008 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.

From risk to planning Making the bridge from risks to audit plans Richard Maggs Astana September 2014.

Towards a harmonised approach for collection and interpretation of data on emerging substances in the environment in support of European environmental.

International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.

Lesson 8: Effectiveness Macerata, 11 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.

IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.

Environment Committee Issues Corina Hebestreit The Barytes Association 16 November 2005.

Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.

Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to the BDP Environmental Resources.

1 Internal Audit. 2 Definition Is an independent activity established by management to examine and evaluate the organization’s risk management processes.

Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,

Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.

REACH Activities in progress in ITALY UNICHIM - Milano

REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.

REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.

Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.

REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.

Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Strategic Co-ordination Group meeting May 2011 Jorge Rodriguez.

1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.

1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 1 Agenda Item 5 : (a) Data collection, associated data treatments.

International Office for Water Prioritisation of substances under the WFD: Compilation of the comments WG E (4), Brussels, 15-16/10/2008.

International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.

Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.

Key elements of the concepts and approaches within the EU in the chemical sector Dr. Marcus Moreno-Horn TAIEX: Workshop, Yerevan 2-3 May 2011 Federal Office.

Analysis Manager Training Module

11.3 Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis

CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process

Unified Approach to Stormwater Monitoring (UASM)

On behalf of the EEA/EC INSPIRE team

Groundwater Watch List Meeting

Law Sub-panel Generic Feedback - Impact

Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview

Land Quality Groundwater Monitoring at Sellafield Presented by

Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.

Review of the WFD priority substances list

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.

ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.

Results of breakout group

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview

European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water

Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture

Two main areas identified

Stakeholder Engagement in Research Priority setting

Developing guidance with Member State-regulators to implement bioavailability-based environmentally quality standards for metals. Graham Merrington WG.

Groundwater watch list

Report Of further work on Prioritization 5th meeting WG-E

International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program

Collaboration of CIS WG GW with NORMAN Group on GW Watch List

Paul Whitehouse Chair, EG-EQS

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC

Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances

WG E on Priority Substances

13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero

Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play

Agenda Item 6: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) EAF(9)-06/02/INERIS - Data processing - preparation for data collection.

Review of the results of monitoring-based prioritisation

EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006

Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience

Changed 3rd to next Dean Leverett Graham Merrington

Mandate and proposal for working methods

Presentation transcript:

Proposals for the Identification and Prioritisation of Candidate Priority Substances under the next Review Dean Leverett Graham Merrington

Overall Approach Second Stage Two Stages First Stage Primarily based on procedures applied in last Review But also accounting for the outputs of last review First Stage Re-evaluation of outputs of last Review Ensures outputs of last review are utilised to the maximum extent Identifies ‘high risk’ candidates without need for ‘re-prioritisation’ Second Stage Monitoring and Modelling-based Ranking Exercises considering; New candidate Substances (not considered in last review) Substances included in last review but not prioritised owing to lacking information Substances included in last review (and not prioritised) for which underpinning data has changed since last review

Monitoring-based Ranking Proposed criteria for data acceptance of monitoring data; Only substances monitored at least 4 MS in the same matrix? 90th percentile of monitored concentrations as opposed to mean concentrations (to try and account for seasonal variation)? Criterion which establishes cases where the LOD is significantly above the screening PNEC or similar?

Modelling-based Ranking Inclusion of metals and certain organo-metal substances Possibly by use of a metal-specific, parallel modelling approach. Such an approach would allow a combined ranking of both organic substances and metals based on the PEC/PNEC ratio. REACH registration data is used to improve the quality of the exercise All QSAR and other quantitative tools used in the previous prioritisation are reviewed to ensure fitness for purpose Updates to the ECETOC TRA tool are appraised to determine if any would be useful to the process PNEC values should be harmonised between approaches (monitoring and modelling)

Sources of Candidate Substances (for Modelling-based Ranking Exercise) Substances added to PPP Directive Annex I since last review Substances added to Biocides Directive Annex I since last review REACH Substances designated as SVHC since last review Substances considered to be PBT or vPvB since the last review (and not designated as REACH SVHC) High tonnage production substances and those with uses consistent with environmental release Substances prioritised by MS as Specific Pollutants Pharmaceuticals (pre-ranked based on risk?) Substances for which modelling-based risk could not be assessed owing to a lack of data, or which were not prioritised but for which new underpinning information is now available.