© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Hospital Live Delivery Captured Maternal Death

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

before and after rehabilitation

Ringe stage of malaria parasite under microscope

Intermediate-level learner

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Total Number of persons Tested

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

Total Energy Consumed (%)

Table 1. Distribution of the various organisms according to prevalence

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Text Format Files Number Files Size(Bytes) Words Number

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Cumulative Percentage

Cumulative Percentage

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

Table 4. Comparison of time-window by emergency gastroscopy

S. No. Product Name yield content

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 2. Comparison of the execution time of Manual Attendance and Attendance Management System Student Manual Attendance Attendance System 1 22.78 3.81 2 12.82 3.43 3 19.65 4.12 4 11.38 3.63 5 12.65 2.53 6 16.24 2..49 7 14.66 2.72 8 15.23 3.35 9 15.03 4.01 10 16.31 4.21 11 14.97 4.31 12 15.16 3.85 13 15.18 4.32 14 16.54 4.78 15 16.59 4.23 16 16.92 3.55 17 16.95 4.34 18 17.61 5.11 19 17.72 3.36 20 17.78 4.57 21 18.01 3.12 22 18.25 3.31 23 18.62 3.1 24 19.19 2.92 25 19.34 2.83 26 19.67 4.47 27 19.72 5.05 28 19.85 3.34 29 19.89 3.42 30 20.52 31 20.91 4.92 32 22.03 3.58 33 23.16 34 23.19 5.19 35 24.21 5.52 36 10.68 3.72 37 15.37 4.33 38 15.68 39 11.92 4.87 40 19.23 3.53 41 20.86 2.12 42 14.17 2.34 43 17.75 3.89 44 15.99 3.75 45 27.69 46 25.39 2.38 47 24.46 2.41 48 19.87 4.11 49 15.24 3.08 50 20.05 2.98 51 17.45 3.67 52 13.67 3.52 53 21.15 3.71 54 19.08 4.05 55 14.44 5.00 56 3.97 57 19.9 2.56 58 15.28 3.45 59 12.76 60 23.75 3.54 61 12.34 62 15.43 4.07 63 17.32 4.93 64 4.91 65 14.89 66 17.6 3.99 67 16.43 4.04 68 18.75 5.14 69 19.32 70 19.3 3.79 71 3.62 72 18.92 2.87 73 4.52 74 17.41 4.09 75 18.43 4.26 76 18.52 77 19.8 78 15.87 79 19.42 80 17.62 O. Shoewu et al. Biometric-based Attendance System: LASU Epe Campus as Case Study. American Journal of Computing Research Repository, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, 8-14. doi:10.12691/ajcrr-2-1-2 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.