Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model of Minority Student Retention
Advertisements

Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation and Institutional Renewal Michael F. Middaugh Assistant Vice President Institutional Research and Planning University.
360 Degrees: Conducting a Comprehensive Evaluation of Your Integrated Planning Processes Bri Hays Jill Baker San Diego Mesa College RP Conference April.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Campus Improvement Plans
The Periodic Review Report and the Assessment of Institutional Effectiveness Presentation by: Karen Froslid Jones and Robin Beads, American University.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
The Periodic Review Report: Providing Evidence that Institutional Planning and Budgeting are Linked Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, &
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
SEM Planning Model.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Self Study: Some Things to Consider The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey September 20, 2010.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Manoa Budget Committee Update Kathy CutshawFebruary 18, 2015.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
The Learning Evidence Team Dr. Tracy Edwards Chief Learning Officer Valencia Community College February 18, 2004.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Value & Excitement University Technology Services Oakland University Information Technology Strategic Planning Theresa Rowe October 2004 Copyright Theresa.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
CONVENING OF TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC PLANNING Tuesday, January 11, 2005 Denton, Texas.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Creating a S.I.M.P.L.E. & Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Residence Life and Housing Dr. Mike Fulford Emory University Student Affairs Assessment Conference.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Getting There from Here: Creating an Evidence- Based Culture Within Special Education Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth Jack States.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
The Periodic Review Report: Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
Cedar Crest College Strategic Planning Community Day.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Pınar TOPÇU Planning Expert Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Assessment, Accreditation, and Retention. “Thriving at the Liberal Arts College: Best Practices in Operations and Research” Dr. Claire Robinson, University.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
FY15 High-Level Finance Goals
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Performance and Quality Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional Research Prince Georges Community College Largo, MD

The Standard An institution conducts ongoing planning and resource allocation based on its mission and goals, develops objectives to achieve them, and utilizes the results of its assessment activities for institutional renewal. Implementation and subsequent evaluation of the success of the strategic plan and resource allocation support the development and change necessary to improve and to maintain institutional quality.

Plan Set measurable goals Objectives to achieve the goals Allocate sufficient resources Assess progress

Plan Set measurable goals Objectives to achieve the goals Allocate sufficient resources Assess progress

Otherwise …

Wants Pressures Terrific Ideas

Lets unpack the standard … In the service of the institutional mission...

Ongoing Planning Is there a written strategic plan? Do members of the institutional community know it exists? Do they smirk when you ask them about either the plan or the planning process? Is its approach holistic? Is there evidence that there is an ONGOING planning PROCESS ?

Ongoing Planning Is there evidence that planning is supported at the highest level of the institution? What individual and/or unit is responsible for keeping the planning embers burning? – Where is that individual/unit positioned within the organizational chart? What institutionalized organizational structures and venues exist to facilitate an ongoing and participatory PROCESS? Do the entities charged with the responsibility of leading the planning process have the appropriate authority to do so?

Clearly Articulated Goals Are there any? Do they logically tie back to the institutions mission statement? How widely are they disseminated? How deeply do they permeate the institutional culture? What institutionalized process is in place to develop and review them? How inclusive and transparent is this process? Quality always trumps quantity.

Washington & Jefferson Strategic Goals (May 2007) Enrich the Intellectual Culture of Washington & Jefferson College. Develop the Whole Student Both Inside and Outside the Classroom. Bring the World into W&J and W&J into the World. Fortify the Sense of Community at Washington & Jefferson College. Secure the Future of Washington & Jefferson College.

Objectives to achieve the goals Do the objectives make sense given the goals? Are they clearly articulated? Well understood across the institution? Are they measurable? Reasonably achievable? Quality always trumps quantity.

Activities/Strategies Are there strategies in place to achieve the objectives? Do they make sense? Are the strategies being implemented? Is progress being tracked? Is progress regularly reported?

Washington & Jefferson Goal: Fortify the Sense of Community at Washington & Jefferson College – Clarify and strengthen our proud identify as a liberal arts college and a teaching institution. – Invest in the retention, recruitment, and support of our top-notch faculty and staff to sustain positive morale. – Improve campus communication and planning so that all are informed and work toward a common goal. – Build bridges to our alumni community.

Resource Allocation Has the discussion of what distinguishes a strategic initiative from an operational necessity occurred? Is there a regular and systematic process that attempts to provide reasonable resources to facilitate achieving intended outcomes? Are the number of strategic initiatives to be achieved each year reasonable given available financial and human resources? Have the initiatives been prioritized? Has the potential impact of multiple-year initiatives been taken into consideration? Are these processes transparent and participatory?

Assess Results Is there a systematic assessment process in place? Are appropriate data routinely collected and systematically analyzed? Are the results of planning-influenced decisions readily accessible (e.g., dashboards, annual reports)? Do the results achieved match the intended outcomes stated in the objectives and goals? Were the objectives/strategies appropriately resourced?

Utilizes Assessment Results Are the assessment results communicated? Is there evidence that assessment results are being used for improvement? Are there mechanisms and opportunities that allow for these improvements to be made (mid-course corrections)?

Supports the Change Necessary to Improve & Maintain Institutional Quality Can members of the institution articulate progress or improvements that can be tied back to the influence of the planning process? Do the outcomes achieved bring the institution closer to achieving its goals and mission?

Feedback to the Institution Accomplishments – Progress, innovations Clearly articulated resource allocation process Regular reporting of progress Suggestion – Meets the standard but you might want to consider …. Adjusting the budget calendar Providing additional opportunities for input Publishing progress/results on the Intranet

Feedback to the Institution Recommendation – Improvement advised to continue to meet the standard Results of planning and resource allocation processes neither regularly nor clearly communicated across the institution. Variability of regular ongoing institutionalized Requirement – Institution does not comply with the standard Lack of evidence that …

Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, Institutional Renewal, Institutional Resources, Administration Planning must be rooted in an institutions mission Planning is a VERB Planning must be thoughtful, deliberate, and systematic Planning is participatory Planning strives to find a balance between external expectations and institutional aspirations Planning must be predicated on analytical and evaluative information Planning must be used for institutional decisions, including resource allocation Planning and its results must be reviewed and renewed

Ima Gonna MY PLAN

Plan Set measurable goals Objectives to achieve the goals Allocate sufficient resources Assess progress