School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams A specific, data-driven process to create powerful changes in instruction in any school.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Data Analysis Training PDP Goals & Strategies September, 2012.
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
Individual Education Plans in Practice Timetable 9:00 - 9:15IEPs in the Code of Practice 9:15 - 9:30Planning and target setting: whole-school approaches.
Analyzing Student Work
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Parkland School Division
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
SMARTR Goals for School-Based Administrators
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
What is Learning-Focused?
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
ABC School Data Wall Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams A specific, data-driven process to create powerful changes in instruction in any school

System Initiatives The Blue Print Data Team School Improvement Plans Cambridge Curriculum Terra Nova testing CFAs

Aligning the initiatives to improve teaching and learning SYSTEM ARTICULATES GOALS SCHOOL DEVELOPES IMPROVEMENT PLANS TO MEET THE GOALS SCHOOL DATA TEAMS COLLECT DATA TO DETERMINE GROWTH OR SUCCESS ON GOALS SYSTEM REPORTS ON OUTCOMES OF GOALS

ALL SCHOOLS DEVELOP A PLAN SYSTEM (Department) ARTICULATES OVER ARCHING GOALS THE ADS COLLECT ZONE DATA AND REPORT SYSTEM IMPROVE- MENT TEAM BOARD OF EDUCATION MINISTER OF EDUCATION The Bermuda Public

Purpose 1.Carry out actions designed by the System Improvement Team. 2.Design, implement, and monitor a school improvement plan that is aligned with the Systems Student Outcome Indicators. 3.Coordinate the work of the grade-level, common-course Data Teams. School Improvement & Data Team

Steps in the Process 1.Conduct analysis of schools performance in relation to all relevant Student Outcome Indicators 2.Set a target for each Student Outcome Indicator relevant to the level. 3.Determine limited number of Student Outcome Indicators that will have highest priority. 4.Determine limited number of high-priority, high-leverage Adult Action Indicators required to achieve priority Student Outcome Indicators. 5.Design strategies to achieve priority Adult Action Indicators. 6. Design data systems to monitor progress on both adult actions and student outcomes. Step One School Improvement & Data Team Step One Step Two Step Three Step Four

Additional Guidance A school must set a target for each Student Outcome Indicator identified by the System Improvement Team (SIT) appropriate to the level of the school. The schools adult action indicators may not address all student outcome indicators specifically Each school will add a student outcome indicator that is significant to your school School Improvement & Data Team

Tier One Indicators from Goal 1 A1: 80 % of P6 students will score at level 3 or higher on Cambridge International Primary Achievement Test (CIPAT) achievement tests in English, mathematics and science. A2: 75% of M3 students will score at or above level 3 on the Cambridge Checkpoint Assessment in English, mathematics and science. A3: 80% of students will demonstrate scoring at level 3 or higher on International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) in English, math and science. A4: 90 % of students leaving preschool will enter primary school ready to succeed as measured by a Primary School Assessment. A5: 90 % of primary and middle school students will read at or above grade level on standardized reading benchmark assessments. A6: All students with an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) will achieve mastery on IEP goals annually.

Priority Action Versus Business as Usual How Could We Be Focused On So Few Student Outcome Indicators?

Priority Actions 1.Included in plan 2.Have to change dynamically 3.Something brand new

Business as Usual 1.Can make progress with little or no change 2.May not be thrilled but can live with it for now 3.Not in plan

Reflection Are the student outcome indicators: 1.Aligned with the System goals? 2.Focused on highest priorities? 3.Set with reasonable targets? 4.Based on accurate analysis? 5.S pecific. M easurable. A ttainable. R ealistic. T imley ?

Step Two Identify, create, implement, and monitor a limited number of research supported, high- leverage adult action indicators that have the highest probability of achieving the identified Student Outcome Indicators. We need to create as much data, or more, about the actions of adults as we have about students.We need to create as much data, or more, about the actions of adults as we have about students.

Adult Action Indicators Generic vs Specific Generic Broad strategies like Marzano, Hattie Feedback Compare/Contrast Parental involvement Concept mapping Specific Focused on specific identified student weaknesses Skill specific Domain specific Grade specific A combination of Generic and Specific

Domains Most of our Adult Actions will fall in one of the following domains: StructureStructure – How we deliver instruction CurriculumCurriculum – What we teach InstructionInstruction – How we teach ClimateClimate – How people behave PersonnelPersonnel – Who teaches

How Do We Carry Out Step Two? School Adult Action Indicators focus on school-wide work. Similar to the analysis we performed on students, we perform an analysis of current adult actions. Two basic questions 1.What are we doing well? 2.What do we need to get better at?

How Do We Carry Out Step Two? What Are We Doing Well? Which practices can we identify that have documented evidence of improving student outcomes? Categories to consider: Grouping strategies Instructional strategies Assistance strategies Behavioral strategies Are there ways we can improve these practices to make them even more effective? Training Frequency

How Do We Carry Out Step Two? What Do We Need To Get Better At? (or stop doing) Which practices can we identify that we cannot document significant evidence of improving student outcomes? Categories to consider: Structural Curricular Instructional Behavioral What do we need to do about these practices? Improve them Stop doing them and do something else

How Do We Carry Out Step Two? What Do We Need To Get Better At? What practices can we identify that have a proven positive impact on student achievement that we are not doing well or not doing at all?

One Way to Begin the Conversation Why do we even have to set these goals? Why arent we achieving these things already? What ideas, procedures, traditions, or other issues are preventing us from accomplishing the goals already?

Some Guidelines Before We Answer 1.Cannot blame the students 2.Stay objective, factual, no personal attacks 3.This conversation may help us with a direction as to what we need to do

How Do You Develop Adult Action Indicators? Generate as many ideas as possible. –Controlled brainstorm activity Apply a set of consideration standards. –Research –Previous experience –Pilot program Narrow the field Do extensive research. Beware of I think.

Generating Ideas for Adult Action Indicators Getting Started Controlled Brainstorm Activity 1.Individual reflection 2.Small-group discussion 3.Large-group discussion

Consideration Standards What standards will we apply to the ideas that are proposed? Research Previous experience Pilot programs Rigor Probability of success Leverage

Samples of Adult Action Indicators I.Feedback: We will increase the percentage of observed lessons containing high quality feedback as defined by our rubric from an average of 15 percent to 90 percent. II.Collaboration: We will increase the percentage of Data Team meetings that meet the exemplary standard on our rubric from 25 percent to 90 percent.

Step Three Write your Strategies for improvement (Action Plan)

Action Plans The Adult Action Indicator tells what we are going to do. The Strategies describes how we are going to do it.

Action Plans For each Adult Action Indicator it develops, the School Improvement & Data Team writes an Strategy Plan that describes the major steps involved in carrying out the Adult Action Indicator

Making It Work 90% of primary school students will read at or above grade level (Fountus & Pinnell) benchmark assessments. Identify the need. P. 2 P. 3P. 1 P. 5 P. 4 Support Staff Decoding Reader Text Comprehension Phonemic Awareness P.6

Step Four Create Results Indicators (How will we know if we are on the right track?)

Results Indicators For each Adult Action Indicator it creates, the school/instructional team creates a set of results indicators, data streams that inform the team that 1.The adults are doing what they said they would do 2.Adult behavior is changing 3.Students are improving

Results Indicators 1.Are the adults doing what they said they would do? 2.Have the adults changed the way they behave? Adult ActionsAdult Actions Student OutcomesStudent Outcomes 1.Are the students getting any better at the critical skill(s) we identified?

Examples of Results Indicators Training completed Coaching sessions held Adult Behaviors Snapshots of feedback Increase in percent of high quality lessons Adult ActionsAdult Actions Student OutcomesStudent Outcomes Results of quarterly benchmark assessments Results of common formative assessments Grades

Final Word Re Adult Action Indicators We may have different Adult Action Indicators for different grades or subjects. Example: Focus on improving feedback in math in primary 4 and 5. Focus on improving the quality of Guided Reading in grades 1-3.

The DATA team - Data Walls Another workshop will look at the next phase of work Data collection Monitoring of Implementation % of observations containing exemplary feedback 9/23 11/8 12/1

Lets look at the Plan