Juvenile Data Exchange (JDEX) Technology Committee Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Illinois Justice Network Portal Implementation Board Meeting February 11, 2004.
Advertisements

Mn Juvenile Justice & Mental Health Initiative Mental Health Screen Best Practices From: Blueprint for Change.
Geographic Information Systems Presented to House Information Management and Technology Committee Information Resources Management Division Feb. 8, 2005.
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
California Community Corrections Performance Incentive Act Overview SB 678 Briefing San Francisco Regional AOC Office November 29, 2010 SB 678.
1 Nevada Offense Code (NOC) Governance Model Presented by Scott Sosebee and Julie Butler Department of Public Safety and Administrative Office of the Courts.
Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children.
Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Juvenile Detention Reform: New York City’s Commitment to Data-Driven Policy and Community-based Alternatives Annie Salsich Director, Center on Youth Justice.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
ANGELA BELL, ESQUIRE RJIP TASK FORCE FACILITATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT COORDINATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Seamless System of Information Sharing Safe Children’s Action Group Plenary Session June 26, 2002.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Justice Grantmaking  Background and History  The MacArthur Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.
Background KICH was initially established after representatives from Kentucky Housing Corporation (KHC) participated in a Homeless Policy Academy in 2002,
Effective Partnerships in Providing Education to Youth in Detention Centers Sheril R. Smith, Ph.D., Director Office of Dropout Prevention Mississippi Department.
JJDPA Reauthorization 2009: An Update DMC Action Network Annual Meeting May 15, 2009.
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE OPERATING BUDGET DEFICIT Wansley Walters, Secretary Rick Scott, Governor SENATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMITTEE October.
Association on American Indian Affairs Juvenile Justice Reform and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
Health Care Cost Database Presented by the Office of the Commissioner of Securities and Insurance January 2011.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.  Elected officials  Community organizations involved in domestic violence services  Law enforcement  Orange County Corrections.
1 Pennsylvania’s JJSES Where Are We? Where Are We Going? Keith B. Snyder, Deputy Director Pa. Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission SPEP Orientation and Rater’s.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
Incident Management PCCYFS June 27, 2007 Incident Management for the Office of Children, Youth and Families.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Your Vote Counts, Preferences For The Future. Should courts, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers and detention services be provided with increased.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
ORGANISATION OF EASTERN CARIBBEAN STATES OECS Social Protection Technical Committee Meeting 23 MARCH 2015 Sandals Regency, La Toc St. Lucia.
JUVENILE DATA EXCHANGE Jorge Basto, Chief Information Officer Wendy Hosch, Judicial Information Services Manager Judicial Council / Administrative Office.
IT Vendor Management March, 2015 Peter Baskette Pratike Patel.
Elizabeth Evans Getzel Virginia Commonwealth University
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
All Things CACJ Ms. Taylor Jones
Supervision of Insurance Market Conduct in Canada
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Florida Civil Citation: History and Advocacy
Integrating Employment and Housing to End Homelessness
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
AspireMN Member Meeting
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
Children, Youth and Families, Department ENTERPRISE PROVIDER INFORMATION CONSTITUENT SERVICES (EPICS) MASTER PROJECT Project Closeout September 26,
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Fulton County Justice & Mental Health Task Force
Juvenile Justice Technical Assistance
PRETRIAL JUSTICE IDAHO
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Mission
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Select Committee on School Safety - Prevention and Response Protocol Subcommittee Recommendations Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative.
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Juvenile Data Exchange (JDEX) Technology Committee Presentation March 9, 2017 Judge Greg Price, Floyd County Juvenile Court Chair, Council of Juvenile Court Judges (CJCJ), JDEX Committee

Georgia’s Juvenile Justice System has lacked a centralized record keeping system and information sharing platform. This has long been a barrier to judicial decision-making and the provision of a uniform justice experience for youth offenders in our State. Background

The problem has been made more complex by the fact that the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) only provides probation and court services to children upon request from local Juvenile Courts (OCGA §49-4A-7) The percentage of Georgia’s at-risk youth are roughly split between DJJ dependent and independent counties. Background

Dependent versus Independent courts Importantly, offense data has not accompanied youth offenders as they move between independent and dependent jurisdictions.

The Georgia Juvenile Proceedings Code requires that courts complete the Detention Assessment Instrument (DAI) for any pre-adjudication detention. The Pre-Disposition Risk Instrument (PDRA) is required to determine appropriateness of post-adjudication detention. Both are intended to enhance evidence-based decision-making in juvenile proceedings (House Bill 242 [2013]). Neither can be reliably completed with the current information sharing barriers. Background

Enter Juvenile Data exchange (jdex): A collaborative solution JDEX brings together the Georgia Council of Juvenile Court Judges (CJCJ); Georgia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC); Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ); the Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget (OPB); and the Judicial Council of Georgia, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to develop a consolidated information repository. Enter Juvenile Data exchange (jdex): A collaborative solution

Work on JDEX began in 2015 with the leadership of the CJCJ Technology Committee as a response to a Criminal Justice Reform Council recommendation. Collaborative efforts have culminated in a data dictionary to standardize core juvenile justice data elements, the development of the exchange architecture and data mapping protocols, implementation guidelines, and analytics. The JDEX Committee elected to initially focus on DJJ’s Juvenile Tracking System (JTS) along with Canyon Solution’s case management system (JCATS), which collectively contain approximately 80% of Georgia’s juvenile cases. JDEX data elements include demographics, previous DAI and PDRA assessments, offense histories, and detention and sentencing decisions. JDEX Overview

DJJ and Canyon Solutions have agreed to upload updated juvenile records to JDEX on a weekly basis. The stated goal is to increase frequency by June 2016. JDEX is not a repository for ”certified” juvenile court records, but a system to alert juvenile court judges and parties to previous youth offender assessments and unsealed contacts across jurisdictions and in both dependent and independent courts. JDEX Overview

As of February 2017, JDEX contains 62,009 juveniles records from independent and dependent courts. Including fully “reproducible” risk assessments complete with detailed responses, individual scores, and risk estimate. Currently JDEX data collection is being expanded to include legal history, detention decisions, and sentencing dispositions (expected May 2017). JDEX Overview

JDEX Overview Total juveniles (Feb 2017): 62,009 County Count Columbia 594 Bartow 471 Troup 411 Gwinnett 4267 Hall 560 Whitfield 738 Gordon 187 Thomas 367 Muscogee 1710 Carroll 176 Upson 201 Cobb 1850 Fulton 4061 Dougherty 1010 Murray 184 Chatham 1016 Houston 1243 Newton 841 Polk 180 20,067 Total juveniles (Feb 2017): 62,009 From Department of Juvenile Justice and Independent Courts utilizing web hosted JCATS CMS ** New Cases opened since courts came online with web-hosted JCATS. Case number will increase over time looking forward. JDEX Overview

JDEX piloting is expected to formally begin in May 2017 with a geographically diverse set of Juvenile Courts. 10 courts including those participating in the Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative (JDAI). The JDEX Committee is planning for statewide implementation by July 2017. Jdex Rollout - Pilots

JDEX is currently standing-up an analytics module that will will allow juvenile court judges and stakeholders to explore statewide and local data at an unprecedented level of granularity. The data are de-identified and aggregated for the purposes of protecting youth records. The data include demographic elements, DAI and PDRA assessments, detention and sentencing patterns, as well as recidivism estimates. JDEX is currently working with Carl Vinson Institute to develop reporting elements and ensure data integrity. The JDEX Analytics Module is expected to be available to Georgia’s Juvenile Court Judges by June 2017. JDEX Analytics

Live demonstration

Advancing juvenile justice JDEX provides a critical information sharing solution to Georgia’s Juvenile Courts to address key barriers. JDEX helps promote enhanced judicial decision- making and a uniform justice experience for youth offenders. JDEX delivers sophisticated analytics to judges and stakeholders to drive informed statewide and local policy planning. JDEX advances juvenile justice and criminal justice reform in Georgia. Advancing juvenile justice