Short SSW Format for 11ay Date: 2016-March-14 Authors: March 2016 Name

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Short MAC Header Date: Authors: John Doe, Some Company
Advertisements

MAC Header Compression
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / SubmissionSlide 1 Short SSW Format for 11ay Date: 2016-March-14 Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone Alecsander
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0496r1 November 2016
MU MIMO beamforming protocol proposal
EDMG Capability and Operation Element Channel Indications
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November, 2015
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2016
Beamforming for mmWave Distribution Networks
BRP Transmit Sector Sweep
<January 2002> doc.: IEEE <02/139r0> 9/12/2018
Short SSW Frame for A-BFT
Protocol and frames for TDD link maintenance
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
EDMG BlockAck Retransmission
11ay Features and Design Principles
Ack and Block Ack in bonded channels
“Near-far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs
“Near-far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs
Asymmetric beamforming training procedure enhancements
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Further considerations on WUR frame format
MU Beamforming for mmWave Distributed Network
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
Mapping DN/CN of mmWave Distribution Network to DMG Entities
Resource Allocation for Unassociated STAs – Follow Up
NDP Transmission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Ack and Block Ack in bonded channels
“Near-far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs
MCS table for SC EDMG Date: 2016-November-07 Authors: November 2016
ACK operation in TDD SP Date: Authors: MAY 2018 Name
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
“Near-far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs
Packet structure for SC EDMG PPDU for each GI length
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Short SSW Frame for A-BFT
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
CCI support of TDD stations
WLAN Radar Date: 2018-December-5 Authors: December 2018 Name Company
Discussion on Group ID Structure
Adding control trailer to control mode PPDUs
Further discussion for WLAN Radar
Further considerations on WUR frame format
EDMG Header-A Fields preview in L-Header
Discussion on SLS with different Tx and Rx antennas
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
EDMG Header-A Fields preview in L-Header
Unsolicited RSS for SLS in DTI
NGV Backward Interoperability: Follow-up
“Near-far” self-classification capabilities of EDMG STAs
CCI support of TDD stations
Generalized Multi-Beamforming for 11ay
Clarification on TXSS Sector List Feedback
Considerations on VL WUR frames
BTI and A-BFT for EDMG AP with Multiple Antennas
Discussion on Group ID Structure
EDMG Support Discovery
Ack and Block Ack in bonded channels
Protocol and frames for TDD link maintenance
Channel Width Selection Within TXOP
Considerations on VL WUR frames
11ay Features and Design Principles
Feedback of Short SSW Packet Based Sector Sweep in DTI
MCS table for SC EDMG Date: 2016-November-07 Authors: November 2016
Control Trailer Clarifications
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Presentation transcript:

Short SSW Format for 11ay Date: 2016-March-14 Authors: March 2016 Name May 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0496r1 March 2016 Short SSW Format for 11ay Date: 2016-March-14 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Email Alecsander Eitan Qualcomm eitana@qti.qualcomm.com Carlos Cordeiro Intel carlos.cordeiro@intel.com Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel) Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)

March 2016 Preface In mmWave path-loss is large and the main method to overcome it is by using high gain antennas. These are practical due to the very short wavelength. Massive arrays provide excellent coverage while AP form factor has “infinite” footprint availability for these arrays. Mobile form factor dictates small arrays. In outdoor, massive arrays are expected. Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Motivation The standard needs to support massive arrays. March 2016 Motivation The standard needs to support massive arrays. Massive array achieves high gain with narrow beam which requires much more sectors to be used for training/access. Example: Massive array with 256 antennas uses 256 sectors. Each sector is ~4 degrees wide. 256 sectors require at least 4 ms for initial sector sweep. SSW is a basic mandatory flow that is essential for reliable link. We want to reduce the massive array SSW time by shortening the SSW duration. We prefer changes which minimize impact to existing software and hardware. Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis March 2016 Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis SSW frame is defined at 8.3.1.16 in 802.11ad. Overall 26 bytes in each SSW frame. Must be transmitted in CP in order to be received by the non-directed receiver.   Frame Control Duration RA TA SSW SSW Feedback FCS Octets: 2 6 3 4 SSW frame format(11ad)   B0 B1 B9 B10 B15 B16 B17 B18 B23 Direction CDOWN Sector ID DMG Antenna ID RXSS Length Bits: 1 9 6 2 SSW field format(11ad) Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis (cont.) March 2016 Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis (cont.) 63% of the scan time is spent on transmissions of the 26 bytes SSW frames and the corresponding parity check bits. 31% of the scan time is spent on preambles + PHY headers. 6% of the scan time is spent on BIFSs. In case of multiple DMG antennas, the percentage is slightly higher due to LBIFS instead of SBIFS. SSW duration is Nsectors*15.8us. Samples Time [us] Preambles 57 x G_128 7296 4.15 Header 5 Bytes 1280 0.73 Payload 26 Bytes 6656 3.78 Parity 2 codewords 10752 6.11 BIFS 1 1.00 Total 15.76 Nsectors 32 64 128 256 512 SSW time [ms] 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 8.1 Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis (cont.) March 2016 Existing Frames: Sector Sweep (SSW) Time Analysis (cont.) When the AP is the initiator and an associated STA is the responder Several fields can be either compressed or removed This is the most common scenario for the SSW. Use of shorten SSW frame is optional (only when the two sides are supporting it). Long time for massive array AP Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Requirements for Short SSW March 2016 Requirements for Short SSW An EDMG STA can transmit Short SSW packets to a peer STA only after, at a minimum, it discovers that the peer STA is also an EDMG STA Knowledge of MAC addresses and possibly STA capability required beforehand A MAC rule is required to this effect The total number of bytes for the MAC payload of the Short SSW packet needs to stay <= 6 bytes A legacy DMG STA shall be able to set CCA busy for the duration of the Short SSW packet by PLCP header detection Initiator needs to be able to indicate to any recipient EDMG STA that the packet is a Short SSW packet To keep it short, SLS using Short SSW packet uses DMG Control PHY and not EDMG Control PHY Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Short SSW format proposal March 2016 Short SSW format proposal 11ad SSW frame Proposed Short SSW packet   Frame Control Duration RA TA SSW SSW Feedback FCS Bits: 16 48 24 32   Packet Type Addressing CDOWN RF Chain ID Short SSW Feedback Direction Reserved FCS Bits: 2 16 11 1 4 26 octets 6 octets Field Definition Packet Type Indicates the type of the packet. Possible values: 0: Short SSW, 1-3: Reserved Addressing The format is TBD. CDOWN A down-counter indicating the number of remaining Short SSW packet transmissions and LBIFSs to the end of the TXSS/RXSS across all antennas. This field is set to 0 in the last Short SSW packet transmission. RF Chain ID Identifies the RF chain the transmitter is currently using for this transmission. Short SSW Feedback In a RSS, contains the value of the CDOWN field of the Short SSW packet that was received with best quality in the immediately preceding sector sweep. The determination of which packet was received with best quality is implementation dependent. This field is reserved when transmitted as part of an ISS. Direction Indicates the direction of the transmission. The Direction field is set to 0 to indicate that the frame is transmitted by the beamforming initiator and set to 1 to indicate that the frame is transmitted by the beamforming responder. FCS The four MSBs of the FCS Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Details of proposed format March 2016 Details of proposed format Short SSW is a PHY packet (similar to 11n/ac NDP), not a MAC frame For this format, the Length field in the PLCP Header is set to 6. Therefore: A legacy DMG STA drops the packet since this is an invalid length, and keeps CCA busy until the end of packet A third party EDMG STA computes the ISS/RSS duration through the CDOWN field and sets the NAV for this duration Packet Type field allows for future packets to be defined and that use the same approach Short SSW Feedback field allows using the Short SSW for ISS and RSS Support of up to 2048 sectors Hash function for Addressing field is TBD. Short SSW duration is 9.6usec (including the BIFS) (saves 37.8%) For EDMG STAs, define LBIFS as equal to: 2*TXTIME(Short SSW)+2*SBIFS Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

March 2016 Summary The standard needs to support massive arrays with many sectors. The SLS overall duration scales with the number of sectors. We suggest to reduce the SLS duration by shortening the SSW duration. We suggest to add a Short SSW Format to 11ay to be used EDMG STAs reducing the transmission duration to 9.8usec (37.8% saving) Suggested format supports ISS and RSS up to 2048 sectors We also suggest to set the LBIFS to be same as duration of two Short-SSW and keep the counting CDOWN during this period. Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)

Motion Insert the following in section 7 of the SFD: “ March 2016 Motion Insert the following in section 7 of the SFD: “ 7.6 EDMG Beamforming The format of the Short SSW packet is defined in <slide 5>. ” Insert the following in section 4.2 of the SFD: “ An EDMG STA shall not transmit a Short SSW packet to another STA that is not also an EDMG STA. For SLS using Short SSW frames, LBIFS is equal to 2*TXTIME(Short SSW) + 2*SBIFS. An EDMG STA performing an SLS using Short SSW frames shall increase the value of the CDOWN field within the Short SSW frame by two for each LBIFS contained as part of a sector sweep.” Alecsander Eitan (Qualcomm) Carlos Cordeiro (Intel)