Measuring Performance These notes introduce: Timing Program Execution How to measure time of execution of CUDA programs CUDA “events” Synchronous and asynchronous CUDA routines Bandwidth measures Computation measures – floating point operations/sec ITCS 4/5145 GPU Programming, B. Wilkinson, Nov 12, 2013. CUDATiming.ppt
Ways to measure time of execution Generally instrument code. Measure time at two places and get difference Routines to use to measure time: C clock() or time() routines CUDA “events” (seems the best way) CUDA SDK timer
Timing with clock() If program uses cudaMemcpy, which is synchronous and waits for previous operations to complete and returns when it is complete, could use clock(): #include <time.h> // needed for clock() int main() { clock_t start, stop; // return types are clock_t, int’s … start = clock(); // number of clock ticks since prog launched cudaMemcpy … ; mykernel<<<B,T>>>(); // kernel call cudaMemcpy … ; stop = clock(); printf(“Execution time is %f seconds\n", (float) (stop-start)/(CLOCKS_PER_SEC) ; return 0; }
If just measuring time of asynchronous kernel with clock() Important to remember that kernel calls asynchronous and return immediately and before kernels have fully executed. Hence need to wait for kernel to complete. Can be achieved using cudaThreadSynchronize(): start = clock(); mykernel<<<B,T>>>(); // kernel call cudaThreadSynchronize(); stop = clock(); (We will discuss synchronization within a computation later.)
CUDA event timer In general, better to use CUDA event timer. First need to create event objects. cudaEvent_t event1; cudaEventCreate(&event1); cudaEvent_t event2; cudaEventCreate(&event2); creates two “event” objects, event1 and event2.
Recording Events cudaEventRecord(event1, 0) record an “event” into default “stream” (0). Device will record a timestamp for the event when it reaches that event in the stream, that is, after all preceding operations have completed. (Default stream 0 will mean completed in CUDA context) NOTE: This operation is asynchronous and may return before recording event!
Making event actually recorded cudaEventSynchronize(event1) -- waits until named event actually recorded. Event recorded when all work done by threads to complete prior to specified event (Not strictly be necessary if synchronous CUDA call in code.)
Measuring time between two events cudaEventElapsedTime(&time, event1, event2) will return (pointer argument) the time elapsed between two events, in milliseconds. Resolution approx ½ millisecond. Timing measured using GPU clock.
Timing GPU Execution with CUDA events Code cudaEvent_t start, stop; float elapsedTime; cudaEventCreate(&start); // create event objects cudaEventCreate(&stop); cudaEventRecord(start, 0); // Record start event . cudaEventRecord(stop, 0); // record end event cudaEventSynchronize(stop); // wait for all device work to complete cudaEventElapsedTime(&elapsedTime, start, stop); //time between events cudaEventDestroy(start); //destroy start event cudaEventDestroy(stop);); //destroy stop event Time period
Issues to watch for First kernel launch will be more timing consuming than subsequent kernel executions because of code being transferred to GPU. Asynchronous CUDA routines returning before they are complete – a big issue.
Asynchronous and synchronous calls Kernels Kernel starts after all previous CUDA calls completed Control returned to CPU immediately (asynchronous, non-blocking) cudaMemcpy Copy starts after all previous CUDA calls completed Returns after copy complete (synchronous) NEW 2013 - NVIDIA now says this applies only for transfers > 64KB. From “CUDA C Programming Guide” October 2012, page 29.
Asynchronous CUDA routines Control is returns before device has completed request tasked: Kernel launches Memory copies between two addresses in same device memory (Device to device memory copies) Host to device memory copy (<= 64KB) Memory copies with Async suffix Memory set function calls From “CUDA C Programming Guide” October 2012, page 29.
Timing within Kernel -- Using clock() Possible to use clock() within kernel See NVIDIA CUDA C Programming Guide, page 115: “B.10 Time Function clock_t clock(); when executed in device code, returns the value of a per-multiprocessor counter that is incremented every clock cycle. Sampling this counter at the beginning and at the end of a kernel, taking the difference of the two samples, and recording the result per thread provides a measure for each thread of the number of clock cycles taken by the device to completely execute the thread, but not of the number of clock cycles the device actually spent executing thread instructions. The former number is greater that the latter since threads are time sliced.”
Timing within Kernel -- Using events Appears possible to use event timer within kernel. Events can be recorded in specific “stream” objects – sequences of in-order code operating on a data set. Events in default “stream 0” completed when all preceding operations completed by device See NVIDIA CUDA C Programming Guide, page 39 for more details on streams.
Bandwidth Bandwidth is the rate at which data is transferred. Physical connection will define the maximum system bandwidth. Maximum bandwidth K20 (cci-grid08) 208 GB/sec C2050 (grid06/7) 144 GB/sec GT 320M/330M (in Mac pro laptops) 25.6 GB/sec Pentium Core i7 with Quickpath 25.6 GB/sec Xbox 6.4 GB/sec Wikipedia: Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Tesla
K20 bandwidthTest (cci-grid08) [abw@cci-grid08 ~]$ bandwidthTest [CUDA Bandwidth Test] - Starting... Running on... Device 0: Tesla K20c Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) PINNED Memory Transfers Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 5760.5 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) 33554432 6389.0 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) 33554432 143343.5 Result = PASS [abw@cci-grid08 ~]$
C2050 bandwidthTest (cci-grid07) [abw@cci-grid07 ~]$ bandwidthTest [CUDA Bandwidth Test] - Starting... Running on... Device 0: Tesla C2050 Quick Mode Host to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) PINNED Memory Transfers Transfer Size (Bytes) Bandwidth(MB/s) 33554432 5697.6 Device to Host Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) 33554432 4934.0 Device to Device Bandwidth, 1 Device(s) 33554432 103795.3 Result = PASS [abw@cci-grid07 ~]$
Effective Bandwidth = (number_Bytes/time) * 10-9 GB/s Effective bandwidth is the actual bandwidth achieved by a program. If we measure the effective bandwidth of a program, we can compare that to the maximum possible. Effective bandwidth achieved by a program/kernel given by: Effective Bandwidth = (number_Bytes/time) * 10-9 GB/s where: number_Bytes is total number of bytes read or written time is the time period in seconds GB/s = Gigabytes per second = 1,000,000,000 Bytes/s Use effective bandwidth as a metric for measuring performance/optimization benefits* * from NVIDIA CUDA C Best Practices Guide, Version 3.2, 8/20/2010
( (N2 x b x 2) / time) x 10-9 GB/sec Bandwidth of Matrix Copy Operation Copying an N x N matrix: ( (N2 x b x 2) / time) x 10-9 GB/sec where there are b bytes in each number. Need to know size of variables. Integers, int (32 bits) b = 4 bytes Floating point (32 bits) b = 4 bytes Double (64 bits) b = 8 bytes 2 transfers -- Read plus write. From NVIDIA CUDA C Best Practices Guide, Version 3.2, 8/20/2010
Computational Measures GFLOPS Classical measure in high performance computing (HPC) to measure performance is number of floating point operations. Systems have peak GFLOPs, and GFLOPs for doing LINPACK benchmark programs (single and double precision): Tianhe-2 33.86 PFLOPs Titan 17.59 PFLOPs (Linpack) Cray Jaguar 1.75 PFLOPS K20 (cci-grid08)) 3520 GFLOPS (single prec. peak) C2050 (coit-grid06/cci-grid07) 1288 GFLOPS (single prec. peak) GT 330M (in Mac pro laptops) 182 GFLOPS Pentium Core i7 40-55 GFLOPS * All numbers approximate as may not be not comparing under same conditions. Petaflops, 1015 FLOPS, Gflops = 109 FLOPS)
Actual FLOPS Measured using standard benchmark programs such as LINPACK If measure it on your program, can see how close it get to the peak (which presumably is doing only floating point operations).
Sample partial code to measure performance on GPU #define N 1000 // a big number up to INT_MAX, 2,147,483,647 __global__ void gpu_compute(float *result) { int i, j; float a = 0.0; int tid = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x; for (i = 0; i < N; i++) for (j = 0; j < N; j++) a = a + 0.0001; // do something, N x N floating pt operations result[tid] = a; // store result return; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int T = 1, B = 1; // threads per block and blocks per grid float cpu_result, *gpu_result, ans[T * B]; // result from gpu, to make sure computation is being done cudaEvent_t start, end; // using cuda events to measure time float time; // which is applicable for asynchronous code also cudaEventCreate(&start); // instrument code to measure start time cudaEventCreate(&end); cudaEventRecord(start, 0 ); cudaMalloc((void**) &gpu_result, T * B * sizeof(float)); gpu_compute<<<B,T>>>(gpu_result); cudaMemcpy(ans,gpu_result, T * B * sizeof(float),cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost); cudaEventRecord(end, 0 ); // instrument code to measure end time cudaEventSynchronize(end); cudaEventElapsedTime(&time, start, end); printf("GPU, Answer thread 0, %e\n", ans[0]); printf("GPU Number of floating pt operations done %e\n", (double) N * N * T * B); printf("GPU Time using CUDA events: %f ms\n", time); // time is in ms cudaEventDestroy(start); cudaEventDestroy(end); return 0; Sample partial code to measure performance on GPU
Questions