OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
Advertisements

OIL#19 Alternative warm-up procedure (JAPAN proposal) 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
Worldwide Harmonised Test Procedure for Light Duty Vehicles WLTP EVE 2nd Session 13 of September Per Öhlund Co-chair Subgroup EV.
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
1 EVE Session 5 US Response to Regulatory Reference Guide Questionnaire April 12,
Topic 3: Battery performance and durability Presented by: USA, Canada, Recharge Day 1, Agenda Item 5 EVE-12 meeting October 28-29, 2014.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
DATE CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY Shorten range Test Procedure: Impact of constant speed on Range determination.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP-10-12e) 1. Proposals for Adoption 2. Proposals for Discussions 3. Next Actions.
Status report of WLTP Sub Group EV EVE 14. At WLTP IWG 10 Adopted open issues.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-053 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi WLTP-DTC
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-11-19e) 1. Discussion points 2. Next Actions.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-066 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
1 WLTP-DTP- E-LabProc-005 Test Procedure for Electrified Vehicles presented by Japan 24&25 November 2010.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-088 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
12 V SoC – Monitoring - Assessment of Tolerances Audi AG WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-105.
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory JAPAN NTSEL OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-034 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
State of play WLTP Sub Group EV. Sub Group EV meeting 28 of September Last meeting of WLTP IWG 29 of September to 1 of October Final meeting for phase.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
WLTP Vehicle range and energy consumption EVE October 2014.
Lab Process-EV sub group
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP validation test results for BEV(i-MiEV) & OVC-HEV (Prius PHV)
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
1 Battery Comparison NanoSafe™ Possesses Disruptive Combination of Features No Other Battery Type Comes Close.
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-043
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-077
WLTP Annex 8: OVC-HEV:
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Annex8  ( ) CD-CS break-off criteria Proposal from Japan with ACEA Comments ( )
WLTP DTP Lab Process EV sub group
Submitted by the expert from OICA
Design & Performance of Components of Electrical Vehicles
CO2 Effect on WLTc Phase weighting.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
variations in tyre pressure and road surface
Position paper on Mode Construction during Validation 2
Design of Powertrain for an Electric Car
ACEA Comments from ACEA welcomes the idea to develop a shortened range test procedure based on MCT However, ACEA does not support JP proposal.
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-11e
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Discussion paper on Applicable Test Cycle and Mode Construction
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
Problem with Rcda and suggestions for them
Analysis for WLTP UF development
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-028
WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B OIL #25: Chassis dynamometer calibration –
Japanese position Emission compliance In each cycle
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
E-lab group’s suggestion for the development of Utility Factors
Electrified Vehicle Durability
OIL# 52: End of PEV range criteria
Proposal for optional procedure of All Electric Range test (BEV)
Presentation transcript:

OIL#58: Shorten test procedure (validation test in phase 1a)

Trial Tests with Multi Cycle Test Method Test vehicle: Leaf (Nissan) Test plan (1)SCT (Single cycle test) To conduct the range test for each phase. (2)MCT (Multi cycle test) To consider MCT of WLTP based on SAE. (3) Compare SCT and MCT

Proposed shorten test procedure with MCT based on SAE J1634

Test vehicle Vehicle condition: 2011 Model(ZAA-ZE0) Odometer : 4868 km (before the test) Condition 4WD Chassis dynamometer FF 2WD mode Setting weight (for WLTP gtr condition) 1681kg Ambient temperature deg.C 25

Measured Ranges with SCT This SCT test were conducted in the comparison with MCT and only Middle and Ex-High phases were conditioned in this test. Test Results with SCT Phase Range UBE Usable Battery Capacity Eac AC Recharge Energy Low 177.1 km 18.7 kWh 23.6 kWh Middle 170.1 km 19.7 kWh 24.3 kWh High 147.3 km 20.2 kWh 24.8 kWh Ex-High 98.5 km 19.5 kWh

Example: Measured Discharge Energy with SCT(Middle)

Measured Energy Consumption with MCT Phase Distance km Edc Wh Discharge Energy ECdc Wh/km Energy Consumption Low1 3.10 377 121.6 Middle1 4.75 632 133.2 High1 7.12 986 138.4 Ex-High1 8.25 1652 200.3 Middle2 542 114.0 Low2 335 108.2 CSCM 50.25 7537 150.0 Low3 3.09 108.6 Middle3 4.74 552 116.5 High2 7.11 970 136.4 Ex-High2 8.24 1651 Middle4 539 113.6 Low4 3.08 336 109.1 CSCE 24.26 3495 144.1 Usable Discharge Energy 19.9 kWh Usable Discharge Energy is the summation of Edc.

SOC variation

Calculation equations for ranges with MCT The range with MCT was estimated by the following equations. Energy Consumption Wh/km = k1×EC1+ k2×EC2 + k3×EC3+ k4×EC4 Range km = (Usable Discharge Energy Wh) / (Energy Consumption Wh/km) k1=(Discharge Energy for the first Cycle Wh) / (Usable Discharge Energy Wh) k2= k3= k4 =(1- k1)/3 For middle range; Energy Consumption Wh/km = k1×ECmiddle1+ k2×ECmiddle2 + k3×ECmiddle3+ k4×ECmiddle4 = 115.3 Wh/km Where, k1 = 632 Wh / 19.9 kWh = 0.03 k2 = k3 = k4 = (1- k1)/3 = 0.32 Range km =19.9 kWh/ 115.3 Wh/km = 172.9 km

Estimated Range with MCT Phase Measured Range (SCT) Estimated Range (MCT) Comparison SCT vs MCT Low 177.1km 183.2km 6.1km 3.6% Middle 170.1km 172.9km 2.8km 1.7% High 147.3km 146.1km 1.2km 0.8% Ex-High 98.5km 99.5km 1.0km 1.1% The results show that the error was small. Thus, it is considered that the shorten test procedure with MCT is usable. Time reduction effect with the shorten test procedure with MCT   The measurement of four ranges with SCT consumed 22:00.   The measurement of four ranges with MCT consumed 3:30.

Effect in duration reduction for tests Ranges Single Cycle Test Shorten test procedure WLTC range only 3days Day1 for charge Day2 for WLTP SCT Day3 for re-charge WLTC range and WLTC city range 5ays Day3 for charge Day4 for WLTP city SCT Day5 for re-charge Calculation is applied for WLTP city range WLTC range, Low phase range, Middle phase range, High phase range and Extra High phase range 11days Day4 for Low phase SCT Day5 for charge Day6 for Middle phase SCT Day7 for charge Day8 for High phase SCT Day9 for charge Day10 for extra High phase SCT Day11 for re-charge Calculation is applied for other ranges

Concerns Fluctuation: Influencing factors on range measurement Single Cycle Test Shorten test procedure Range [km] UBE [Wh] DC electricity consumption [Wh/km] method Constant speed NA Affected Cycle sequence Order of phases Cycle configuration Length of CSC Measurement Speed pattern tracing Strongly affected Especially for the final cycle Robustness: Can the both test procedures produce good agreements on results with other PEVs? ⇒Demand for validation tests