Portland District, USACE

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#

Advertisements

Investigate the Life History of Spring Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead in the Grande Ronde River Basin Project Brian Jonasson Oregon Department.

Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.

Investigate Re-establishing Anadromous Fish Populations Above Man-made Barriers Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Willamette Basin.

Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,

Evaluating commercial selective fishing. C.E. Ashbrook J.F. Dixon A.Hoffmann K. E. Ryding E. A. Schwartz J.R. Skalski R. Townsend G.E. Vander Haegen K.W.

Eric Hockersmith,Gordon Axel, and Earl Prentice (NOAA Fisheries Service) Development of an Ogee-based PIT-tag Detection System for Spillbays Roger Anderson,

Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.

Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.

Passage Behavior and Survival for Radio-tagged Subyearling Chinook Salmon at Ice Harbor Dam, 2006 Fish Ecology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

1 Bonneville 2 nd Powerhouse Corner Collector PIT Tag Detection System Project Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Portland.

Looking for Pieces of the Puzzle: LIFE HISTORY OF SPRING CHINOOK IN THE WILLAMETTE BASIN Kirk Schroeder Brian Cannon Luke Whitman Paul Olmsted Oregon Department.

Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.

Evaluation of prototype fish passage structures in the Lower Granite Dam juvenile fish bypass system – juvenile Pacific lamprey results Rod.

1 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER SURVIVAL STUDY, 2010: Passage Behavior and Survival at Bonneville Dam Ploskey, Faber, Batten, Weiland, Hughes, Deng, Fu, Martinez,

Investigation of Avian Predation Upon Salmonid Smolts With the Use of an Active Acoustic / PIT Tag Combination Curt Dotson – Grant PUD Suzie Rizor – Blue.

Evaluation of Fish Passage Distribution at the Ice Harbor Removable Spillway Weir, 2006 Kenneth Ham Shawn Reese Scott Titzler Russ Moursund.

Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.

Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.

1 Mainstem Passage Strategies In The Columbia River System: Transportation, Spill and Flow Augmentation Presented By: Albert Giorgi, Ph.D.

Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U

Design and Performance of the River Mill Surface Collector

BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.

Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)

Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.

Differential Estimates of “Survival” for PIT Tagged Fish – Evidence and Causes Jason Vogel Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix NOAA Biological Goals: 1) Allow fish the opportunity to exit the ladder without stalling or excessive up/down.

Migration pathway, age at ocean entry, and SARs for Snake River Basin fall Chinook prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.

Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002

Using PIT tags to evaluate the post- release survival of spring chinook salmon following their release from commercial nets C. E. Ashbrook, J. R. Skalski,

2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Performed by USGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSC For the USACE Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program.

Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Objective Determine how using 9mm tags may affect our current research project in the John Day Basin.

2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.

Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-Columbia River Projects and Large Spill Events Ken Duncan Portland District PM Environmental Compliance.

Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.

Hydraulic and Biological Evaluations. Hydraulic Evaluations  Measuring flow distribution for fixed vertical or rotating drums (with adjustments available).

BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1 Estimating Avian Consumption John Day Dam & The Dalles Dam NATHAN ZORICH – PRESENTING MICHAEL JONAS PATRICIA.

Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.

Estimated survival of juvenile salmonids through the lower Columbia River and estuary, and estimated mortality from avian predation John Ferguson NOAA.

Changes in Production of one and two year old Steelhead Trout Smolts during Drought Conditions in a Northern California Stream Michael D. Sparkman (CDFW)

2016 Smolt Monitoring Program Juvenile Passage Data and

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting

Evaluation of Adult Salmonid Downstream Passage Through the Sluiceway and Turbines at The Dalles Dam During Late Fall, Winter, and Early Spring STUDY.

Evaluation of Adult Steelhead Downstream Passage Through the Sluiceway and Turbines at The Dalles Dam During Fall 2009, Winter 2009/2010, and Spring.

Dworshak FPOM Tour March 8, 2017 File Name.

Hatchery Subyearling Survival Lower Granite to McNary Dam 1998 to 2007 (preliminary results) Fish Passage Center.

Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.

James Murphy, Keith Van Den Broek, Tom Degroseillier

Comparative Survival Study Project #

Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team

Upper Deschutes River Basin Steelhead Reintroduction

Steelhead status in Idaho – 2012 Update

2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley

Fall Chinook Management Measures

Roza Dam Evaluation Post Modifications

Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

Evaluation of Steelhead Kelt Passage through the Bonneville Dam Second Powerhouse Corner Collector Prior to the Juvenile Migration Seasons, 2007 and 2008.

2017 Flow, Debris, spill and TDG

Science Policy Exchange

NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research

Adult PIT-tag Interrogation System Wells Hydroelectric Project (System Design, Installation and Evaluation) Shane Bickford* Public Utility District.

Hatchery Production Wells Hatchery Steelhead: 450,000 fish annually

Fenton Khan, Gary Johnson, and Mark Weiland

Behavior and Survival for Juvenile Salmonids Passing Ice Harbor Dam during reduced and BiOp spill treatments, Gordon Axel, Eric Hockersmith, and.

Smolt Migration 2006 (preliminary results)

Modifications to TDG Monitoring and Tracking

Miller Rocks Gulls Bob Cordie Biologist The Dalles Lock and Dam

Presentation transcript:

Portland District, USACE Acoustic Telemetry evaluation of juvenile fish-passage efficiency and survival associated with surface-spill treatments at john day dam in 2010 Mark Weiland, James Hughes, Gene Ploskey, Daniel Deng, Christa Woodley, Tom Carlson-PNNL -PSMFC Rich Townsend, John Skalski-University of Washington Portland District, USACE Brad Eppard (COTR)

Objectives SPRING (Yearling Chinook and Steelhead) Compare survival rates associated with 30 and 40% spill treatments Two 2-day treatments within 4 day blocks Calculate single release survival estimates from concrete at JDA to The Dalles Dam Evaluate passage efficiency of the spillway and two top-spill weirs (TSW) in spill bays 18 and 19 Evaluate survival of smolt passing at spillbay 20 with a modified deflector 2

Objectives SUMMER (Subyearling Chinook) Compare survival rates associated with 30 and 40% spill treatments Two 2-day treatments within 4 day blocks Calculate single release survival estimates from concrete at JDA to The Dalles Dam Evaluate passage efficiency of the spillway and two top-spill weirs (TSW) in spill bays 18 and 19 Evaluate survival of smolt passing at spillbay 20 with a modified deflector 3

Spring Spill Treatments 1/17/2019 Spring Spill Treatments

Steelhead Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake 1/17/2019 Steelhead Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake Quick Deployment Overview Flow Unit 1 Bay 20 Bay 1 Unit 20

(Single Release Estimate) Steelhead Survival by Route (Single Release Estimate) Flow JDA 0.961 (0.008) Turbines (1-16) 0.702 (0.075) Spillway 0.978 (0.008) Non-TSW Spillbays 0.954 (0.014) JBS 0.95.0 (0.019) TSW 0.984 (0.008) Spillbay (20) 0.967 (0.023) JDA Forebay 0.997 (0.008) JDA Forebay to JDA Dam 2km

Steelhead Survival by Treatment

Steelhead Passage Metrics All 30% 40% Spill Passage Efficiency (SPE) 88.7% 87.1% 90.2% Fish Passage Efficiency (FPE) 98.2% Fish Guidance Efficiency (FGE) 83.8% 85.7% 81.6% Surface Outlet Efficiency (SOE) 71.8% 75.2% 69.0% Bypass Efficiency (BPE) 9.4% 11.1% 8.0%

Steelhead Survival and Passage Metrics 2008, 2009 and 2010 2010 2009 2008 2008* Passage survival 96.1 95.3 95.9 98.6 30% spill survival 94.3 - 99.1 40% spill survival 97.6 94.6 97.2 Forebay survival 99.7 98.8 99.3 Non-TSW survival 95.4 93.6 98.5 TSW-bay survival 98.4 96.3 96.5 99.2 JBS survival 96.6 97.5 100.2 Turbine survival 72.7 82.3 72.9 74.9 *Paired release survival estimates. 2010 2009 2008 FPE 98.2 97.4 97.2 FGE 83.8 89.0 88.9 SPE 88.7 76.3 74.4 SOE 71.8 50.1 49.6 BPE 9.4 21.1 22.7

Steelhead Residence Time All 30% 40% Forebay Residence Time (hr) 1.37 1.73 1.25 Egress Time (hr) 0.53 .52 Passage Time (hr) 2.59 2.67 2.38

Yearling Chinook Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake 1/17/2019 Yearling Chinook Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake Flow Unit 1 Bay 20 Bay 1 Unit 20

(Single Release Estimate) Yearling Chinook Survival by Route (Single Release Estimate) Flow JDA 0.947 (0.008) Turbines (1-16) 0.795 (0.046) Spillway 0.962 (0.008) Non-TSW Spillbays 0.960 (0.010) JBS 0.904 (0.028) TSW 0.962 (0.009) Spillbay (20) 0.943 (0.017) JDA Forebay 0.996 (0.008) JDA Forebay to JDA Dam 2km

Yearling Chinook Survival by Treatment

Yearling Chinook Passage Metrics All 30% 40% Spill Passage Efficiency (SPE) 89.8% *91.7% *88.0% Fish Passage Efficiency (FPE) 96.3% 96.9% 95.9% Fish Guidance Efficiency (FGE) 64.0% 62.5% 65.4% Surface Outlet Efficiency (SOE) 56.7% 66.2% 47.6% Bypass Efficiency (BPE) 6.5% 5.2% 7.8% *Significant difference

Yearling Chinook Survival and Passage Metrics 2008, 2009, and 2010 2010 2009 2008 2008* Passage survival 94.7 92.7 94.4 95.7 30% spill survival 94.3 93.0 - 95.5 40% spill survival 95.2 92.4 95.6 Forebay survival 99.6 99.5 100.0 Non-TSW survival 96.0 91.2 95.1 96.6 TSW-bay survival 96.2 94.8 96.1 JBS survival 90.4 97.5 96.3 97.6 Turbine survival 79.5 85.1 84.4 85.5 *Paired release survival estimates. 2010 2009 2008 FPE 96.3 93.4 92.1 FGE 64.0 66.2 66.9 SPE 89.8 80.6 76.2 SOE 56.7 27.1 23.6 BPE 6.5 12.8 15.9

Yearling Chinook Residence Time All 30% 40% Forebay Residence Time (hr) 0.57 0.69 Egress Time (hr) 0.60 Passage Time (hr) 2.19 2.30 1.93

Summer Spill Treatments 1/17/2019 Summer Spill Treatments

Subyearling Chinook Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake 1/17/2019 Subyearling Chinook Passage and Percent Discharge by Intake Quick Deployment Overview Flow Unit 1 Bay 20 Bay 1 Unit 20

(Single Release Estimate) Sub-Yearling Chinook Survival by Route (Single Release Estimate) Flow JDA 0.908 (0.006) Turbines (1-16) 0.818 (0.022) Spillway 0.927 (0.006) Non-TSW Spillbays 0.937 (0.007) JBS 0.947 (0.013) TSW 0.912 (0.010) Spillbay (20) 0.891 (0.027) JDA Forebay 0.996 (0.006) JDA Forebay to JDA Dam 2km

Subyearling Chinook Survival by Treatment

Subyearling Chinook Survival by Treatment and Block

Subyearling Chinook Passage Metrics All 30% 40% Spill Passage Efficiency (SPE) 77.6% *74.1% *81.0% Fish Passage Efficiency (FPE) 88.3% *85.8% *90.8% Fish Guidance Efficiency (FGE) 47.8% 45.1% 51.4% Surface Outlet Efficiency (SOE) 31.1% 35.2% 27.2% Bypass Efficiency (BPE) 10.7% 11.7% 9.7% *Significant difference

Subyearling Chinook Survival and Passage Metrics 2008, 2009, and 2010 2010 2009 2008 2008* Passage survival 90.8 83.9 84.4 86.1 30% spill survival 91.4 84.6 - 85.2 40% spill survival 90.6 83.3 86.6 Forebay survival 99.6 99.5 Spillway survival 92.7 84.7 82.7 TSW-bay survival 91.2 91.0 JBS survival 94.7 95.4 97.3 Turbine survival 81.8 74.9 71.4 72.8 *Paired release survival estimates. 2010 2009 2008 FPE 88.3 84.5 83.3 FGE 47.8 42.2 46.8 SPE 77.6 76.3 68.6 SOE 31.1 - 20.6 BPE 10.7 11.3 14.7

Subyearling Chinook Residence Time All 30% 40% Forebay Residence Time (hr) 0.26 0.33 0.22 Egress Time (hr) 0.53 0.51 Passage Time (hr) 1.88 1.94 1.77

Summary There was not a significant difference in survival between 30% and 40% spill treatments for steelhead, yearling Chinook or subyearling Chinook BiOp survival criteria (single release estimates to TDA) Steelhead 96.1% - yes Yearling Chinook 94.7% -no Subyearling Chinook 90.8% - no Spill passage efficiency (SPE) Significantly greater in spring for both steelhead and yearling Chinook No significant difference for subyearling Chinook Surface outlet efficiency (SOE) i.e.TSW efficiency

Summary Minor tag-life correction for steelhead and yearling Chinook No tag-life correction for subyearling Chinook

Conclusion Not a significant difference in survival between 30% and 40% treatments TSW’s in spillbays 18 and 19 Improved passage and survival in spring (surface oriented fish) Attracted subyearling Chinook in summer but lower survival rates than unmodified spillbays (oriented deeper) Modified spillbay 20 Survival at spillbay 20 with modified deflector not as high as unmodified spillbays (better than 2008 and 2009 in spring, possibly due to hydraulic conditions

Acknowledgements Cascade Aquatics: Brenda James 1/17/2019 Acknowledgements Cascade Aquatics: Brenda James PNNL: T Carlson, C Arimescu, G Batten, B Bellgraph, S Carpenter, J Carter, K Carter, E Choi, Z Deng, K Deters, G Dirkes, D Faber, E Fischer, T Fu, G Gaulke, K Hall, K Ham, R Harnish, M Hennen, J Hughes, M Hughes, G Johnson, F Khan, J Kim, K Knox, B Lamarche, K Lavender, J Martinez, G McMichael, B Noland, E Oldenburg, G Ploskey, I Royer, N Tavan, S Titzler, N Trimble, M Weiland, C Woodley, and S Zimmerman. PSFMC: R Martinson, P Kahut, G Kolvachuk, D Ballenger, C Anderson, A Cushing, D Etherington, G George, S Goss, T Monter, T Mitchell, R Plante, M Walker, R Wall, M Wilberding USACE: B Eppard, D Schwartz, M Langeslay, and electricians, mechanics, riggers, operators, and biologists at John Day (M. Zyndol, T. Hurd), The Dalles (B. Cordie) and Bonneville dams (J. Rerecich, B. Hausmann, K. Welch). UW: J Skalski, J Lady, A Seaburg, R Townsend, and P Westhagen.