Re-engineering your approach to the beginning college experience should include an acknowledgement of what is working well and only needs to be maintained,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Annual Updates: Planning for the Future Ryan Cornner Dean of Institutional Effectiveness May 2010.
Program Prioritization
PRAC and Integrated Planning October 22, Integrated Planning Model.
Implementing Academic Renewal: Crafting a plan for transforming the School of Education School of Education Dr. Melanie Carter, Acting Dean Presented to.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Board of Governors January 27, 2014 Update on Enhanced Planning.
Faculty Council October 6, Sub-Goal 1.A. Increase enrollment of Clinton County adult learners (25 years and older).  1.A.1. Increase enrollment.
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Campus Improvement Plans
Guest Author May 2006 Kathleen A. Paris, Ph.D. Consultant, Distinguished, Emeritus Office of Quality Improvement University of Wisconsin-Madison USA On.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
 Background  Preliminary Proposals for program/course reductions  Leadership Discussions  Role of ASGC ◦ Role of COI  Process & Timeline  Budget.
School of Communication Faculty Meeting Agenda  Locating us in Space and Time  The Sustainable Innovation Project  A changing School in a changing College.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
The University of Calgary Planning & Resource Allocation Process Workshops November 17, 2004.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Institutional Effectiveness at CCC The Journey The Priority  It is always important to know if what you are doing is effective. This is the story of.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
What’s driving the need for flexible curricula? How are our learners changing and what are their needs/expectations for flexible curricula? QAA Enhancement.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes - March 15, 2013  ACCJC College Status Report on Student Learning Outcomes Implementation  Respond to.
1 Presenter: Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
PBA Highlights Staff Education Fund – 31 staff employees received assistance Staff Development Fund – 12 departments/26 staff employees.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
Enrollment Management Institute Peralta Community Colleges Goals, Objectives and Expected Outcomes.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Right-Sizing Academic Affairs The New Normal at Appalachian State University Board of Trustees Retreat March 22, 2012.
December 2010 Board of Trustees Overview of the New Accreditation, Accountability, and Assessment Committee Structure.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees August 24, 2015.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
ACADEMIC REORGANIZATION: THOUGHTS ON A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK & TIMELINE ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY March 23, 2010.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Western Carolina University Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Graduate Enrollment Planning January 15, Graduate Enrollment Plan August 2013 Chancellor Dubois charged the Dean of the Graduate School to conduct.
American Public University System: Building a Culture of Collaboration Dr. Gwen Hall, Associate Provost of Academic Effectiveness and Student Success,
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Cañada College Professional Development Committee Determining Participants.
Presented by Rob Till, Chair UAC Craig Bain, Chair UCC Bruce Fox, Chair LSC & member of UAC Niranjan Venkatraman, member UGC & UAC 1 3/10/14.
Seattle Colleges Budget Proposal Fiscal Year
Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Higher Learning Commission: Reaccreditation Visit October 27-29, 2014
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presented To: College Planning Council
CSUN Re-Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Re-engineering your approach to the beginning college experience should include an acknowledgement of what is working well and only needs to be maintained, what initiatives need to be improved, and what initiatives should be added or eliminated. An Action Plan for the First Year

Four areas of focus Prior to enrollment The academic/curricular experience The co-curricular/out-of-class experience Faculty/Staff Development policies programs practices pedagogies assessment

Areas of Excellence What campus policies, practices, programs, pedagogies, faculty development and assessments have achieved a high level of excellence and require no change?

As you create a plan for change, consider the following Priority: Priority can be determined according to perceived importance, number of students affected, alignment with state/regional directives, cost, timeline, and linked to the Colleges strategic plan. Impact (How many students will this change affect?) Alignment with state/federal policy directives. (Does this change respond to a high-priority issue according to the state or federal government?) Alignment with criteria and recommendations of regional/specialized accreditors? Timeline (What will be a reasonable timeline for bringing about this change: this summer, this academic year, within three years, etc.?) Cost (Will the change require no resources, reallocation of existing resources, new resources?) Is the change linked to the Colleges strategic plan?

Considerations Essential expertise (Do current College faculty and staff have the expertise to bring about the change?) Space (Will the change require additional space or modifications in existing space?) Allocation of responsibility (Who or what unit would be responsible for overseeing the change?)

Considerations Required approvals (e.g., administrators, faculty, board of trustees, Michigan Community College System) (Who must sign off on the change?) Potential downsides (Are there potential problems that might be created because of this change? How could those problems be addressed?) Assessment (What will be the goals of the change? What methods will be used to evaluate the outcomes?)

Final Consideration Continued oversight responsibility for the First-Year Plan (Who or what unit/body would be responsible for maintaining the implementation and assessment of the First- Year Plan?)