Diffusion in Networks Dr. Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale 1/17/2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of compatibility in the diffusion of technologies in social networks Mohammad Mahdian Yahoo! Research Joint work with N. Immorlica, J. Kleinberg,
Advertisements

Probability in Propagation
Diffusion and Cascading Behavior in Random Networks Marc Lelarge (INRIA-ENS) Columbia University Joint CS/EE Networking Seminar June 2, 2011.
Dr. Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale Network Theory: Computational Phenomena and Processes Social Network.
How to Schedule a Cascade in an Arbitrary Graph F. Chierchetti, J. Kleinberg, A. Panconesi February 2012 Presented by Emrah Cem 7301 – Advances in Social.
Spread of Influence through a Social Network Adapted from :
Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network
Diffusion and Cascading Behavior in Random Networks Marc Lelarge (INRIA-ENS) WIDS MIT, May 31, 2011.
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Online Social Networks and Media Cascading Behavior in Networks Epidemic Spread Influence Maximization.
School of Information University of Michigan Network resilience Lecture 20.
Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network
Algorithmic and Economic Aspects of Networks Nicole Immorlica.
Efficient Control of Epidemics over Random Networks Marc Lelarge (INRIA-ENS) SIGMETRICS 09.
A Game Theory Approach to Cascading Behavior in Networks By Jim Manning Jordan Mitchell Ajay Mattappallil.
Based on “Cascading Behavior in Networks: Algorithmic and Economic Issues” in Algorithmic Game Theory (Jon Kleinberg, 2007) and Ch.16 and 19 of Networks,
Presentation Topic : Modeling Human Vaccinating Behaviors On a Disease Diffusion Network PhD Student : Shang XIA Supervisor : Prof. Jiming LIU Department.
Epidemics in Social Networks
Re-examining the cascade problem: “... most of the time the system is completely stable, even in the face of external shocks. But once in a while, for.
HIV in CUBA Kelvin Chan & Sasha Jilkine. Developing a Model S = Susceptible I = Infected Z = AIDS Patients N = S+I = Active Population.
Dynamic Network Security Deployment under Partial Information George Theodorakopoulos (EPFL) John S. Baras (UMD) Jean-Yves Le Boudec (EPFL) September 24,
System Dynamics S-Shape Growth Morteza Bazrafshan.
Economics of Malware: Epidemic Risk Model, Network Externalities and Incentives. Marc Lelarge (INRIA-ENS) WEIS, University College London, June 2009.
Multicast Communication Multicast is the delivery of a message to a group of receivers simultaneously in a single transmission from the source – The source.
Interactions in Networks In part, based on Chapters 10 and 11 of D. Easly, J. Kleinberg, Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Cambridge University press.
Online Social Networks and Media Epidemics and Influence.
Contagion in Networks Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2013 Prof. Michael Kearns.
Network Economics: two examples Marc Lelarge (INRIA-ENS) SIGMETRICS, London June 14, 2012.
General Principles of Diffusion. Diffusion – A Definition Diffusion is the process of spread in geographic space and growth through time of an innovation,
Online Social Networks and Media
Λ14 Διαδικτυακά Κοινωνικά Δίκτυα και Μέσα Cascading Behavior in Networks Chapter 19, from D. Easley and J. Kleinberg.
V5 Epidemics on networks
Network Theory: Computational Phenomena and Processes Network Games Dr. Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
 Propagation in Networks. Network Structure and Propagation  Diseases, fads, rumors, viral social media content all spread the same way in networks.
E PIDEMIC SPREADING Speaker: Ao Weng Chon Advisor: Kwang-Cheng Chen 1.
Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network Authors: David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, É va Tardos KDD 2003.
Online Social Networks and Media
I NFORMATION C ASCADE Priyanka Garg. OUTLINE Information Propagation Virus Propagation Model How to model infection? Inferring Latent Social Networks.
 Probability in Propagation. Transmission Rates  Models discussed so far assume a 100% transmission rate to susceptible individuals (e.g. Firefighter.
Networked Games: Coloring, Consensus and Voting Prof. Michael Kearns Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2013.
Advisor: Professor Sabounchi
Class 21: Spreading Phenomena PartI
Siddhartha Gunda Sorabh Hamirwasia.  Generating small world network model.  Optimal network property for decentralized search.  Variation in epidemic.
Steffen Staab 1WeST Web Science & Technologies University of Koblenz ▪ Landau, Germany Network Theory and Dynamic Systems Cascading.
Network Theory: Community Detection Dr. Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
1 Lecture 16 Epidemics University of Nevada – Reno Computer Science & Engineering Department Fall 2015 CS 791 Special Topics: Network Architectures and.
LECTURE 14 The Diffusion of Innovations II 1. Cumulative and Individual Adoption Patterns 2.
Topics In Social Computing (67810) Module 2 (Dynamics) Cascades, Memes, and Epidemics (Networks Crowds & Markets Ch. 21)
Epidemic spreading on preferred degree adaptive networks Shivakumar Jolad, Wenjia Liu, R. K. P. Zia and Beate Schmittmann Department of Physics, Virginia.
Contagion in Networks Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2015 Prof. Michael Kearns.
New models for power law:
What Stops Social Epidemics?
Empirical analysis of Chinese airport network as a complex weighted network Methodology Section Presented by Di Li.
Center for Complexity in Business, R. Smith School of Business
Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks
Diffusion and Viral Marketing in Networks
Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2018 Prof. Michael Kearns
Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network
Effective Social Network Quarantine with Minimal Isolation Costs
The diffusion and adoption of new ideas and new products often follows S-shaped growth patterns. What are the positive feedbacks that generate the initial.
Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2017 Prof. Michael Kearns
Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2014 Prof. Michael Kearns
Department of Computer Science University of York
Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2016 Prof. Michael Kearns
Kempe-Kleinberg-Tardos Conjecture A simple proof
Malik Magdon-Ismail, Konstantin Mertsalov, Mark Goldberg
Viral Marketing over Social Networks
Diffusion in Networks
Navigation and Propagation in Networks
Networked Life NETS 112 Fall 2019 Prof. Michael Kearns
Presentation transcript:

Diffusion in Networks Dr. Henry Hexmoor Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale 1/17/2019

Diffusion The way in which an individual’s choices depend on what other people do. Modeling the processes by which new ideas and innovations are adopted by a population. 1/17/2019

𝐹 𝑡 =𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑝 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑞 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 ×𝐹 𝑡−1 The Bass Model F(t) = Fraction of population who have adopted a new idea or product. p = rate of innovation (lead, generate new ideas) q = rate of imitation (follow, imitate) 𝐹 𝑡 =𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑝 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑞 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 ×𝐹 𝑡−1 Innovation Imitation 1/17/2019

𝐹 𝑡 =𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑝 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑞 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 ×𝐹 𝑡−1 The Bass Model Innovation 𝐹 𝑡 =𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑝 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 +𝑞 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 1−𝐹 𝑡−1 ×𝐹 𝑡−1 𝑑𝐹(𝑡) 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑝+𝑞 ×𝐹 𝑡 1−𝐹 𝑡 𝐼𝑓 𝐹 0 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝 > 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛, 𝐹 𝑡 = 1 − 𝑒 − 𝑝+𝑞 𝑡 1+ 𝑞 𝑝 𝑒 − 𝑝+𝑞 𝑡 Imitation Mostly adopted, e.g., Soda Rarely adopted 1/17/2019

S: Susceptible, I: Infected , R: Removed/Recovered. Epidemic Models They are similar to each other and all use the infection life cycle, e.g, SIR, SIS, SI and SIRE. S: Susceptible, I: Infected , R: Removed/Recovered. SIR SIS 1/17/2019

SIR Model A disease that is caught once in a node’s lifetime. Divide population into S and I. Each I node will remain I for 𝑡 1 time period. During 𝑡 1 time steps, each node has probability, p, of passing disease to on S neighbor. After 𝑡 1 expires, all I nodes become R. 1/17/2019

SIR Model Contagiousness is constant at each step of I phase. Contagion probability is uniformly fixed to p. Certain links may provide a more rapid contagion due to nature of contacts. SIR can be interpreted as a percolation model if and only if links are pipes. SIR saturates after time - no more infections. 1/17/2019

SIS Model A disease that is caught repeatedly by a node. Divide population into S and I. Each I node will remain I for 𝑡 1 time period. During 𝑡 1 time steps, each node has probability, p, of passing disease to on S neighbor. After 𝑡 1 expires, each I node becomes S, as before. In SIS, if all nodes are simultaneously free of disease (S), then the epidemic has ended. 1/17/2019

The Cascade Model Can be captured by using a coordination game. Consider v and w are neighbors playing the given coordination game. Let p be the fraction of v’s neighbors playing A and (1−𝑝) fraction play B. Let v have d neighbors. v’s payoff for 𝐴=𝑝 ×𝑑×𝑎 𝐵= 1−𝑝 ×𝑑×𝑏 Behavior A is preferred Iff 𝑝𝑑𝑎≥ 1−𝑝 𝑑𝑏 which is equivalent to 𝑝≥ 𝑏 𝑎+𝑏 =𝑞 v’s preference threshold 1/17/2019

The Cascade Model 𝑝≥ 𝑏 𝑎+𝑏 =𝑞 If at least q fraction of its neighbors adopt A, v adopts A as well. In other words, if q is small, v adopts A. If q is large, then v adopts B. Behavior adoption spreads in the network by successive behavior adoption. This is the basic for viral spreading. 1/17/2019

A Cluster of Density p A set of nodes such that each node in the set has at least a fraction p of its neighbors in the set is a cluster of density p. A cluster of density 1 is all the nodes in the network. For each i and j clusters of density p, i ∪ j is also a cluster of density p. A cascade halts when it encounters a dense cluster. Clusters are the only obstacles to cascades. 1/17/2019

Cascade Model Revised Individuals (i.e., v and w) value behaviors A and B differently. If v has d neighbors of when p fraction have behavior A, (1−𝑝) have behavior B. If 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝐴 𝑑 =𝑝≥ 𝑏 𝑣 𝑎 𝑣 + 𝑏 𝑣 = 𝑞 𝑣 (v’s threshold for adopting A), then A is the better choice. 1/17/2019

An Example 1 3 since 0.1 < 1/3. Then, 3 2, 3 5, 2 4, 5 6 Cascade stops at node 4 and 6. 1/17/2019

References D. Easly, J. Kleinberg, 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Cambridge University press. 2. M. Jackson, 2008. Social and Economic Networks, Princeton University press. 1/17/2019