Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Figure 1s. Antipodal cells show active CDC::H2B:YFP signal in a three day emasculated female gametophyte. At this stage, three days following.
Advertisements

A Histone H3 Lysine-27 Methyltransferase Complex Represses Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana  Gu Xiaofeng , Xu Tongda , He Yuehui   Molecular.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
Loss of Function of MULTICOPY SUPPRESSOR OF IRA 1 Produces Nonviable Parthenogenetic Embryos in Arabidopsis  Anne-Elisabeth Guitton, Frédéric Berger 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Hugh Dickinson, Rod Scott  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Nathan D. Lawson, Scot A. Wolfe  Developmental Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Transcriptional Activation of Arabidopsis Axis Patterning Genes WOX8/9 Links Zygote Polarity to Embryo Development  Minako Ueda, Zhongjuan Zhang, Thomas.
Zhongjuan Zhang, Elise Tucker, Marita Hermann, Thomas Laux 
Hexin Tan, Wanqi Liang, Jianping Hu, Dabing Zhang  Developmental Cell 
LET-418/Mi2 and SPR-5/LSD1 Cooperatively Prevent Somatic Reprogramming of C. elegans Germline Stem Cells  Stéphanie Käser-Pébernard, Fritz Müller, Chantal.
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Double Fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana Involves a Polyspermy Block on the Egg but Not the Central Cell  Scott Rod J. , Armstrong Susan J. , Doughty.
Kaoru Sugimoto, Yuling Jiao, Elliot M. Meyerowitz  Developmental Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Plant Reproduction: AMOR Enables Males to Respond to Female Signals
Volume 20, Issue 23, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
A Small RNA Pathway Mediates Allelic Dosage in Endosperm
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Plotting a Course Developmental Cell
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
RPK1 and TOAD2 Are Two Receptor-like Kinases Redundantly Required for Arabidopsis Embryonic Pattern Formation  Michael D. Nodine, Ramin Yadegari, Frans.
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Kristin M. Beale, Alexander R. Leydon, Mark A. Johnson  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Evangelia Vogiatzaki, Célia Baroux, Ji-Yul Jung, Yves Poirier 
Sangho Jeong, Travis M. Palmer, Wolfgang Lukowitz  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (July 2009)
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
MEDEA Takes Control of Its Own Imprinting
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Control of PHERES1 Imprinting in Arabidopsis by Direct Tandem Repeats
Germline Development and Fertilization Mechanisms in Maize
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 589-596 (September 2011) HMG Domain Containing SSRP1 Is Required for DNA Demethylation and Genomic Imprinting in Arabidopsis  Yoko Ikeda, Yuki Kinoshita, Daichi Susaki, Yuriko Ikeda, Megumi Iwano, Seiji Takayama, Tetsuya Higashiyama, Tetsuji Kakutani, Tetsu Kinoshita  Developmental Cell  Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 589-596 (September 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2011 21, 589-596DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SSRP1 Is Required for Activation of Imprinted FWA-GFP (A–D) Fluorescence images of pFWA::ΔFWA-GFP ovules before fertilization (A and B), and of seeds at 2 days after pollination (DAP) seeds (C and D). (E–G) The central cell in WT (E) and ssrp1-3 ovules (F and G) at 6 days after emasculation (DAE). Egg cell (blue), central cell nucleus and primary endosperm nuclei (pink) are pseudocolored. (H) Silique elongation in ssrp1 and wild-type at 7 DAE. (I and J) Expression pattern of the KS22 endosperm marker in the mature female gametophyte (I) and in the dividing nuclei of the central cell without fertilization (J). Note that all ovules containing autonomous endosperm expressed the KS22 marker. Background expression of KS22 can also be seen in the integuments at the micropylar end. Scale bars represent 50 μm. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 589-596DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects on Imprinted Seed Phenotypes in Arabidopsis (A–C) Phenotypes of developing F1 seeds at (A) 4 DAP, (B) 7 DAP, and (C) 15 DAP in a cross between female ssrp1-3+/− and male wild-type. Orange arrowheads indicate a class of seeds with a white and plump phenotype; some of these are aborted at a late stage as indicated by the orange arrowhead in (C). (D–F) A wild-type seed (left in D and E) and a seed showing endosperm over-proliferation (right in D and F) in a cross between female ssrp1-3+/− and male wild-type. (G–I) Phenotypes of heteroallelic seeds from a cross between female ssrp1-3+/− crossed with male ssrp1-2−/− at (G) 4 DAP, (H) 7 DAP, and (I) 15 DAP. White arrowheads show small shriveled seeds at an early stage. (J–M) Images of cleared seeds of wild-type (J and L) and of heteroallelic seeds (K and M) from a cross between female ssrp1-3+/− and male ssrp1-2−/− at (J and K) 4 DAP and (L and M) 6 DAP. (N–T) Fluorescence images of pFWA::ΔFWA-GFP in (N and O) heterozygous spt16-1, (P and Q) heterozygous spt16-2, (R and S) heterozygous ssrp1-4, and (T) homozygous spt16-2 mutants (N, P, R, and T) before fertilization and (O, Q, and S) after fertilization. Shrinkage of the embryo sac at the micropylar end and absence of central cell nuclei (white arrowhead) are visible in (T). These aborted ovules are GFP negative. Scale bars represent 200 μm (A–D and G–I), 50 μm (E, F and J–T). See also Figure S2, Table S1, and Table S2. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 589-596DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Expression and Methylation Status of Imprinted Genes (A–C) qRT-PCR analysis of well known imprinted genes in ovules that inherited either the wild-type allele and the ssrp1-3 allele (A) before fertilization or at (B) 3 DAP with wild-type pollen. Expression patterns of the selected imprinted genes from a recent genome wide analysis of the ssrp1-3 ovules are displayed in (C). The transcript levels were normalized against UBQ10 expression for (A) and (B) and ACT11 for (C). Error bars represent standard deviation (SD); n = 3 biological replicates. (D) Top: central cells with or without GFP were released, and collected under a microscope. Scale bars represent 50 μm. Bottom: qRT-PCR analysis of FWA, FIS2, DME, and MET1 in the isolated wild-type, dme-1, and ssrp1-3 central cells. The transcript level was normalized against ACT11 expression. Error bars represent SD; n = 3 biological replicates. (E) Percent methylation of the 5′ SINE-related repeat of FWA in the WT embryo and endosperm or after maternal inheritance of ssrp1-3. Methylation levels for each fraction were determined by bisulfite sequencing. n = number of sequenced amplicons. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 589-596DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Genetic Interactions of DNA Methyltransferase (met1), DNA Demethylase (dme), and the HMG Domain Gene (ssrp1) (A) The frequencies of nonfluorescent and fluorescent ovules in plants with different genotypes; wild-type, heterozygotes for met1-3, dme-1, or ssrp1-3, double heterozygotes for dme-1;met1-3 or ssrp1-3;met1-3. The proportions (%) of ovules with strong fluorescence (green box), weak fluorescence (yellow-green box), or nonfluorescence (cream box) were determined during endosperm development after fertilization with wild-type pollen. n = number of counted ovules. (B) Proportion (%) of fluorescent ovules in the absence of fertilization. In ssrp1-3 heterozygotes (left), a 1:1 segregation of fluorescence was consistently observed from 0 to 3 days after maturation of the female gametophyte (DAM) regardless of nuclear division in the autonomous endosperm. (C–N), Fluorescence images of pFWA::ΔFWA-GFP in the double heterozygote for ssrp1-3; met1-3 (C–E) before fertilization, (F–H) in ovules 1 DAP, (I–K) 3 DAP, and (L–N) 2 DAM of the female gametophyte without fertilization. The white arrowheads indicate autonomous endosperm nuclei. Scale bars represent 50 μm. See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2011 21, 589-596DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions