Induction of Pluripotency in Adult Unipotent Germline Stem Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oct4-Induced Pluripotency in Adult Neural Stem Cells Jeong Beom Kim, Vittorio Sebastiano, Guangming Wu, Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo, Philipp Sasse, Luca Gentile,
Advertisements

Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines from Adult Rat Cells
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Hypoxia Enhances the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Comparative gene expression profiling of adult mouse ovary-derived oogonial stem cells supports a distinct cellular identity  Anthony N. Imudia, M.D.,
Reconstitution of Mouse Spermatogonial Stem Cell Niches in Culture
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Reprogramming of T Cells from Human Peripheral Blood
Complete Meiosis from Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Germ Cells In Vitro
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Oct4-Induced Pluripotency in Adult Neural Stem Cells
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Mouse SCNT ESCs Have Lower Somatic Mutation Load Than Syngeneic iPSCs
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Induced Neuronal Cells: How to Make and Define a Neuron
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Wnt Signaling Promotes Reprogramming of Somatic Cells to Pluripotency
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Cord Blood
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
In Vivo Direct Reprogramming of Reactive Glial Cells into Functional Neurons after Brain Injury and in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model  Ziyuan Guo, Lei Zhang,
Jamie A. Hackett, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Sabine Dietmann, M. Azim Surani 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Germline Competent Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Rat Blastocysts
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Epigenetic Memory and Preferential Lineage-Specific Differentiation in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Human Pancreatic Islet Beta Cells 
Isolation of Epiblast Stem Cells from Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Yasuhiro Yamada, Hitomi Aoki, Takahiro Kunisada, Akira Hara 
Presentation transcript:

Induction of Pluripotency in Adult Unipotent Germline Stem Cells Kinarm Ko, Natalia Tapia, Guangming Wu, Jeong Beom Kim, Marcos J. Araúzo Bravo, Philipp Sasse, Tamara Glaser, David Ruau, Dong Wook Han, Boris Greber, Kirsten Hausdörfer, Vittorio Sebastiano, Martin Stehling, Bernd K. Fleischmann, Oliver Brüstle, Martin Zenke, Hans R. Schöler  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 87-96 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Establishment of a GSC Line from the Testis of PND 35 Oct4-GFP Mice (A) Typical GSC colonies formed in culture. (B) GSCs express the GFP gene under control of the Oct4 promoter (details as in A). (C) Three months after transplantation of GSCs into the W/W recipient mice, the testes were larger than those of controls. (D and E) Photomicrographs of the testicular tubules of a recipient mouse. Note that transplanted Oct4-GFP-positive GSCs (E) colonized the seminiferous tubules. (F) The testes of recipient mice produced spermatozoa. Spermatogenesis in the testes of W/W mice was restored by the transplantation of GSCs. Scale bars, 100 μm (A and D), 2 mm (C), 25 μm (F). Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Establishment of gPS Cells and Cellular and Molecular Characterization of gPS Cells (A and B) Conversion of GSCs into ESC-like cells (gPS cells) after 4 weeks in culture. Distinct Oct4-GFP-expressing colonies were observed in the induction culture. (C and D) Established ESC-like cells from Oct4-GFP-expressing colonies. The colonies displayed morphology similar to that of ESC colonies and were positive for Oct4-GFP. (E) ESC-like cells (gPS cells) stained positive for alkaline phosphatase. (F) Immunofluorescence staining revealed SSEA1 expression in the ESC-like cells (gPS cells). (G) Hierarchical analysis of different cell types: ESCs, GSCs, neural stem cells (NSCs), MEFs, gPS cells, 2FNSC-iPSCs (Kim et al., 2008), 1FNSC-iPSCs (Kim et al., 2009), and ESC-like cells from PND 0-2 testis (Kanatsu-Shinohara et al., 2004). (H) Comparison of global gene expression between ESCs and GSCs (left), and between ESCs and gPS cells (right). Scale bars, 200 μm (A), 100 μm (C and E). Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Methylation Status of Differentially Methylated Region of H19 and Imprinting Control Region of Igf2r in ESCs, GSCs, Passage 5 gPS Cells, and p20 gPS Cells DNA methylation was analyzed by bisulfite genomic sequencing. Open and filled circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpGs, respectively. DMR, differentially methylated region; P, passage. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Analysis of Chimera Formation (A) Blastocyst stage of an embryo created by the aggregation of an 8-cell-stage embryo with gPS cells. Note that Oct4-GFP-positive gPS cells contributed to the development of the inner cell mass. (B and C) Male (B) and female (C) fetal gonads from E14.5 embryos. Oct4-GFP-positive germ cells were detected in both male and female gonads. (D) Arrowhead indicates black coat color chimerism by donor gPS cells (C57BL6 background). (E) Genotyping of GFP gene in F1 offspring using IL2 gene as endogenous control. M, male; F, female; PC, positive control; NC, negative control; MW, molecular weight marker. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Differentiation and Function of gPS Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes and Neural Cells (A and D) α-actinin-positive (green) cross-striated cardiomyocytes. (B) Action potentials recorded with a sharp electrode from a beating area (d5 + 7 EB); right panel: enlarged single action potential. (C) Spontaneous and synchronous Ca2+ transients (left panel) recorded from three different (cells are marked in the right panel, ∼200–300 μm apart) Fura-2-loaded cardiomyocytes. (D) Connexin 43 staining in adjacent cardiomyocytes (red). (E) Extracellular field potentials recorded with multielectrode arrays from beating areas of differentiated (d4 + 14) EBs. Negative (top traces, charbachol [CCh]) and positive (lower traces, isoprenaline [ISO]) chronotropic modulation is observed. Hormonal modulation statistics of normalized beating frequencies (right panel; p < 0.05; CCh: n = 4, ISO: n = 7, error bars: SEM). (F–H) Following in vitro growth factor withdrawal, gPS cell-derived-glial precursors (GP) produced 33% ± 6% O4-positive oligodendrocytes and 55% ± 10% GFAP-positive astrocytes. (I–K) Upon transplantation of gPS cell-derived-GP cells into the brain of myelin-deficient (md) rats, myelination of host axons in the corpus callosum was observed. Newly formed internodes are identified using an antibody specific to PLP, which is absent in the PLP-deficient md rats. Astrocytes are labeled with the mouse-specific M2 antibody. (F–H) Conventional fluorescence photomicrograph. (I–K) Confocal image. Scale bars: 50 μm (A), 230 μm (C), 8 μm (D), 50 μm (F–K). Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Characterization of GSCs from Single GSCs and gPS Cells from the Clonal GSCs (A) Phase contrast photomicrograph of P1C1 GSCs. (B) Clonally established formation, which is a functional characteristic. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (C and D) Phase contrast photomicrograph (C) and GFP fluorescence (D) of P1C1 gPS cells. (E) Blastocyst stage of an embryo created by the aggregation of an 8-cell-stage embryo with P1C1 gPS cells. (F) Oct4-GFP-positive germ cells were detected in male fetal gonads from E14.5 embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Critical Time Frame and Cell-Number-Dependent Microniche for the Conversion of GSCs into gPS Cells (A) A subpopulation of GSCs was converted into gPS cells at about 14 days of culture. Time course observation of the growth of gPS cells. Nanog expression was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining. (B) The number of gPS cell colonies was counted from day 0 to day 21 of culture. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (C) The number of converted gPS cell colonies depends on the initial number of GSCs plated per well in 24-well plates. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Cell Stem Cell 2009 5, 87-96DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.025) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions