The new C-OSS Timetable features are not fully in line with C-OSS expectations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Registration System Version 1.1 Student’s Manual Developed by Ovais Khan.
Advertisements

We increase the impact of marketing measures and enhance our customers’ brand value. In order to achieve this goal we combine market research and consulting.
Using Linked Submissions in Editorial Manager™ Created by J. Putrino, 3/21/2013.
We increase the impact of marketing measures and enhance our customers’ brand value. In order to achieve this goal we combine market research and consulting.
We increase the impact of marketing measures and enhance our customers’ brand value. In order to achieve this goal we combine market research and consulting.
Welcome to BLT Online NQT Induction.
The Transport Layer Implementation Services Functions Protocols
Internet Protocol Address
fresh thinking for powerful marketing
Systems Analysis and Design
Czech-Slovak Corridor
Confirmation and Feed Logs July 2017 Tips and Tricks
AODB/RMS System Features and Highlights
 BUT …. Terminal pilot REQUEST TO THE CCB
ILab Accounts If you have not done so already, you must register for an iLab account to use any iLab-controlled instruments and equipment To create an.
For Using of TAF Test Manager (TTM)
STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (SIS)
Chapter 3 Switching.
Welcome to Research Wave/IACUC
LEGAL CONTRACT ALLOCATION MODULE
PCS Statistics and main development’s history 2017
Net 431 D: ADVANCED COMPUTER NETWORKS
Setting Up and Supporting Clients Using Employee Development in ADP Workforce Now [Developer: Use this slide if you are not using audio. You can add.
PCS Follow up Project Preliminary results.
Routing and Switching Essentials v6.0
More Selections BIS1523 – Lecture 9.
Non-RU Applicant (NRA), PCS UG
RFC Short Term Path Request Pilots
Current activities Vienna, 10th May 2017.
PCS Technical Board 17th October 2017, Vienna.
Envelope Concept report, PCS UG
Confirmation and Feed Logs July 2017 Tips and Tricks
Chapter 8 Arrays Objectives
Appeals Process Screener Training Module Module 6
PCS Outlook PCS User Group 12th September 2018, Vienna.
PCS Minor Release th February 2018, PCS UG.
PCS CCB Group 22nd February, 2017.
بسمه تعالی کارگاه ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی
TAF-TSI Train Object 25th June 2018, Prague.
PaP Publication strategy TT2019 – Combined PaP
PCS Technical Board 1st June 2017, Vienna.
NEOMIN – Teacher Assistant Module
EEC Core Team 6th February 2018, Vienna.
Development roadmap PCS Day 2017.
Timetable Process Quality PCS User Group
PCS User Group 15th February, 2017.
PCS Developments – PCS CCB
Retrospective report of the past year
Update timetable in PCS dossier from national system
Information for SAS Students at UofG
PaP Product Definition
Chapter 8 Arrays Objectives
Medical Provider Portal User Guide
Taskforce „TT Quality“: Report from First Workshop (short)
STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (SIS)
Handling of PaP identifiers
ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG Network Access – Customer Care Patrick Wögenstein
PCS Link I-TMS 3 PCS IT Day
Major 2018 For TT2019 Ad-Hoc Path Request For TT2020 New Path Request
PR deadline experiences, PCS UG
Trainings before Problems: New user
RFC Short Term Path Request developments
COMP755 Advanced Operating Systems
Developments Confirmation by the CCB that the TAF TSI components have been successfully implemented into PCS Confirmation by the CCB that PCS has been.
Envelope Concept report, PCS TB
Quick Border Information
PCS Test Group 9 July 2019, Vienna.
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
TT Quality monitoring on borders
and Forecasting Resources
Presentation transcript:

C-OSS Community Experiences of pre-allocation phase PCS User Group meeting– 15 May 2018

The new C-OSS Timetable features are not fully in line with C-OSS expectations Pre-allocation of the relevant PaP is a requirement for editing it. In normal cases this is the appropriate logic, but not in conflict resolution. The allocation can not be reversed even if the amendment would require another dossier to be awarded. C-OSS is unable to adjust offset. In many cases (e.g. conflicts) the problem stems from an incorrect offset. All these cases should be forwarded to PCS support  not efficient from the process point of view.

The new C-OSS Timetable features are not fully in line with C-OSS expectations Times, Location type, Activity type… for operation points of F/O/I could not be changed by the C-OSS. RFCs have no rights to change any data in location under the responsibility and assigned to the IMs. C-OSS should be able to change offset, times, parameters, activity, location types in all locations belonging to the request.

Other remarks Partial submission of PaP-section in combined Dossiers containing sections which should be allocated as PaPs and sections to be allocated as tailor-made was not possible. It was only possible to submit a tailor-made path. Plausibility check for times added to border locations with bandwidth RFC 5&8 C-OSS: to make sure, that the request has been placed correctly, the bandwidth of (e.g. of 60+/-) had to be checked for each location manually. PCS-User should only be able to adjust within the time range (similar as implemented for length and weight). Process for alternative PaP offer needs to be improved Currently ”Search for alternative” and ”Reserve alternative” functions work in an a way that can only be applied section-by-section. The C-OSS can not search and reserve the next section until the Customer approves the previous one  Ping Pong Report for the calculation of Feeder / Outflow / Sandwich distances Still manual work  request data from the IMs CIS ? Reliability of PAMT, different data in PAMT Slowness of the PCS-system

Thank you for your kind attention!