Review of End of Year/ End of Grant Reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Advertisements

1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
Support and Inclusion of students with disabilities at higher education institutions in Montenegro – Procedure for collecting valid documentations.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Periodic Report - Finance Grazyna Guz & Erik Fuglsang Finance Officers.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
CPMS II Capital Program Management System for Transportation Authorities.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
PGCE Full-time SE3 Briefing March Aims Be aware of the expectations of SE3 Understand what is expected of you during the block experience Understand.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Finance and SFVS for School Governors Core Responsibility Overseeing the financial performance of the school and making sure its money is well spent.
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
Ismar Financial and administrative procedures Nearest Kick-off meeting Bologna, 11 October 2006.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
ESIF Technical Compliance Requirements May 2015 WORKSHOP Helen Joicey.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: analysis per cost category Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
How to Complete a Matching Grant Application. Learning Objectives Overview of the MG process Preparing to complete an application Completing application,
AJEEP Conference Washington State Plaza Hotel February 3, 2012 Quarterly Reporting for Grants and Cooperative Agreements.
TRIBAL VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Quality Assurance reviews assumes that things will be improved with input and understanding of.
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
Budgeting for Outcomes November 28, 2012 ISAC Fall School of Instruction.
Information System Project Management Lecture three Chapter one
1 SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE PUBLIC HEARINGS 13 FEBRUARY 2007.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Grant Administration Agreement Which governs the relationship between NSFAS & Institutions.
RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.
How to Complete a Matching Grant Application. Learning Objectives Overview of the MG process Preparing to complete an application Completing application,
Mission Development in Charges “Supporting growth in our churches” Diocese of Edinburgh St Hilda’s Fund.
PRTR Project reporting Steering Committee Meeitng and Inception Workshop PRTR Project November 2015 UNITAR/GEF/PRTR2/SCM1 Pre 10.
Scheme to Support National Organisations Application Guidance 19 th January, 2016 Pobal is a not-for-profit company that manages programmes on behalf of.
Local Oral Administration/ STAAR A using PowerPoint ILT FEBRUARY 2, 2016.
Technical Assistance Office 1 Contract, Reports and errors to avoid! GRANT AGREEMENT 2005 Comenius coordinators’ meeting, 17/10/2005 Maryline Fiaschi,
Sponsored Research Accounting1 Cost Transfers Policy and Procedure.
S19: Documentation of fieldwork. Session Objectives ♂ In the last session, we have discussed the standards of documentation and the standard files to.
ADMINISTRATION. Goals of this session Understanding of the administrative process for the funding of a CERF project Understanding of.
Policy and Procedure. Definition A cost transfer is the reassignment of a previously incurred expense from one account to another Transfers are considered.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
SCHOOLS New Governors Finance Training- February 2014 By Christine Atkinson (Schools Management Accountant)
The BIG Meet, Hampden 1 December 2009 Grant management – what to expect.
2016/17 Tri-Agency Financial Monitoring Review Best Case Scenario Michael Walesiak, CPA, CA Associate Director, Finance Research Services Office, University.
Resolving issues noted on Procurement 0. Issues noted on Procurement 1 1.Section 17(1)(4)(b)(c) of the Public Procurement and Disposal Regulations, 2006.
York, North Yorkshire & East Riding Local Enterprise Partnership Bio-economy Growth Fund Application process September 2016.
Award Set-Up and Advances
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
Welcome - Pupil Premium
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
How to make a preparatory project application Maxi Nachtigall “How to Apply” seminar 4th February Sundsvall, Sweden European Union European Regional.
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
FEDERAL PROGRAMS FINANCE
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
RRI MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Our new quality framework and methodology:
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
On the Georgia Milestone
Assessment Needs Analysis
Centre Standardisation Training
How to Complete a Matching Grant Report
Select Committee on Finance Presentation by
THE NATIONAL TREASURY FEEDBACK WORKSHOP ON THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2017/2018.
Primary Care Commissioning Committee 29th May 2018
BRIEFING ON THE ADJUSTMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL BASIC EDUCATION
Description of Change(s)
Presentation transcript:

Review of End of Year/ End of Grant Reports Role of Grants Officers

Review of Reports – Report Types Reports all similar – differences around levels of information required End of Year Mid Year End of Grant Review form as a whole – completeness All sections completed Signed by authorised person Follow up any omissions

Review of Reports – Outcomes & Milestones Assess progress of project against agreed outcomes How they were achieved How they were measured Assess progress of milestones Review Discrepancies Discrepancy justified Is this acceptable What remedial action is required: Adjustment Deletion Additional

Review of Reports – Assess Overall Project progress What worked What didn’t work Where things went wrong What was done about it Or what is being done about it and by when Considered to be a “Good Practice” What is the current staff position Leavers New Starts Concerns – abilities, training etc Any impact on the budget

Review of Reports – Budget v Actual 1 Is all spend eligible Spending across agreed budget heads Capital items as agreed, receipts provided Are any Budget Heads Over-Spent or Under-Spent It is unusual to see a perfect match of budget to actual Description or justification provided Where the budget is Over Spent How was it accounted for

Review of Reports – Budget v Actual 2 Where the budget is Under Spent Is there a desire to carry it forward Agreement of GO is required – maybe higher authority Confirm agreement – or repayment will be necessary Confirm any remedial action if required Needs to be added to next project year budget Next project year Budget Fully reviewed and agreed Under spend accommodated where relevant

Review of Reports – Other Funding Was all other funding for year being reviewed Received? Evidenced? Is funding for new year expected? – if so Secured?

Review of Reports – Conclusion Grading of Report by GO Project and Outcomes are graded Unacceptable Problematic Good Outstanding Confirm follow on actions with Grant Holder Detail of action Review process if required To agreed deadlines

Any Questions?

End of Year Reports – Frequent Issues Questions on forms not properly answered Explicit information on progress of outcomes and milestones is lacking Different activities reported on than what was recorded during assessment Justification for under-performance not provided Unexpected outcomes often not reported Lack of information about the project overall and the differences it has made Budget Reporting is too exact No explanation or justification as to why underspend or overspend Other funding - not included or evidence not provided New Year Budget - underspend not included when agreed Checklists not completed Supporting documents often not provided