Accountability Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida’s School Grading System Overview and Updates 1.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. School Accountability Rules.
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Communication Webinar:
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Accountability Update
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
Accountability Applications 2017
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
2017 State Assessment Highlights
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Accountability Update
Highlights of Utah’s Plan
Accountability Update
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Overview of School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress,
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Michigan School Report Card Update
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Gisela Feild Administrative Director
A-F Accountability and Special Education
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Starting Community Conversations
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Accountability Presentation
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
School Improvement Process
CA Dashboard 2018 Overview Presentation to the Governing Board
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Update

Overview 2018 School Grades Results School Grades Methodology Overview ESSA Overview and Timeline

2018 Charter School Grade Results

2018 School Grades Traditional and Charter Schools

Charter School Grade Changes Grade Increased– 113 Schools Grade remained the Same – 326 Schools Grade Decreased – 64   Grade 2017  Total A B C D F Grade 2018 196 19 5 220 42 49 24 1 116 8 33 73 12 127 3 20 2 34 6 247 105 21 503

Charter - Avg. Percent of Points Earned Change 2017 ELA Achievement 60 Component Charter - Avg. Percent of Points Earned Change 2017 2018 ELA Achievement 60 61 1 ELA/Reading Gains 58 59 ELA/Reading Low 25% Gains 53 Math Achievement 62 2 Math Gains 57 Math Low 25% Gains 52 Science Achievement 54 3 Social Studies Achievement 76 78 Graduation Rate 92 High School Acceleration 56 5 Middle School Acceleration 65

Statewide Charter School Highlights The percentage of charter schools earning an “A” or “B” increased to 68 percent (364 schools), up from 64 percent (340 schools) in 2016-17. Charter high schools saw the largest percentage point increase in “A” schools 52 percent (34 schools) of charter high schools earned an “A” in 2017- 18, up from 37 percent (25 schools) in 2016-17. 309 charter schools maintained an “A” grade (196 schools) or increased their grade (113 schools) in 2016-17 “F” charter schools decreased by more than half (56 percent), dropping from 16 schools in 2016-17 to 7 schools in 2016-17.

Did Not Increase Their Grade 75% of Charter Schools Graded “D” or “F” in 2017 Improved Their Grade in 2018 Did Not Increase Their Grade 25% Increased Their Grade 75%

100% of F Schools That Also Received a Grade in 2018 Improved Their Grade 1 Improved to a “B” 25% 5 Improved to a “C” 25%

Florida’s Focus on Low Performing Schools is Paying Off 94 91 53 33

School Grades

School Grades Model (A maximum of 11 components) English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies Graduation Rate Acceleration Success Achievement (0% to 100%) Overall, 4-year Graduation Rate High School (AP, IB, AICE, dual enrollment or industry certification) Learning Gains Blank Learning Gains of the Low 25% Middle School (EOCs or industry certifications)

Percent Tested Must test 95% of students Calculated for each assessment and then aggregated. Schools that do not test 95% of students will receive grades of “I” Superintendents can appeal the “I” by demonstrating that the data accurately represents the school’s progress or requesting that late reporting assessment results be included. Commissioner will review data to determine if the performance data is representative of the school’s progress. If the Commissioner determines the data is representative, she will release grades for these schools at the end of the appeals period.

Learning Gains in School Grades 2014 Legislature established a new framework for learning gains requiring that learning growth toward achievement levels 3, 4, and 5 is demonstrated by students who scored below each of those levels in the prior year (s. 1008.34(3)(b), F.S.) Method for 2002 to 2014 Method Used Since 2016 Improve one or more achievement levels from one year to the next (e.g., move from Level 1 to Level 2; Level 2 to Level 4, etc.) Same Maintain a Level 3, Level 4, or Level 5 from one year to the next Same, except for Level 3 and Level 4, in addition to maintaining the level, the student’s scale score must have improved from one year to the next For students who remain in Level 1 or Level 2, demonstrate a specified scale score gain For students who remain in Level 1 or Level 2, demonstrate a learning gain by increasing their score to a higher subcategory within the Level (e.g., move from the bottom third of Level 1 to the middle third of Level 1)

Learning Gains of the Lowest 25% Calculated for both English Language Arts and Mathematics Applies the same learning gains methodology to the lowest performing 25% of students Determining the lowest performing 25% of students Uses the performance of students in the prior year calculated at each grade level to identify the lowest performing 25% of students (EOCs not by grade level) Low 25% is no longer limited to students in Achievement Levels 1 and 2

Middle School Acceleration The percentage of eligible students who passed one or more high school level statewide, standardized end-of-course (EOC) assessments or attained industry certifications identified in the industry certification funding list Calculated for all schools that include grades 6, 7, and 8 or grades 7 and 8 Eligible students include full-year-enrolled students, who are current year grade 8 students who scored at or above Achievement Level 3 on the Mathematics statewide assessments (FSA & EOC) in the prior year, or are full-year-enrolled students in grades 6, 7, or 8 that took high school level EOC assessments or industry certifications (industry certification data is the most recent available and lags by one year) Students must be enrolled in the course to be included A student is included in the calculation no more than once

Graduation Rate The most recent 4-year cohort graduation rate measured according to 34 § CFR 200.19 Calculated for all schools that include grades 9 to 12, grades 10 to 12, and grades 11 and 12 Also calculated for combination schools that include these grade levels Beginning in 2016-17, students who withdraw to a private school that the district has a contract with will remain in the graduation cohort for their last public school

College and Career Acceleration Cohort-based calculation using the graduates from the graduation rate calculation as the denominator The percentage of graduates who, while in high school Were eligible to earn college credit through AP, IB, or AICE examinations Earned a C or better in dual enrollment or Earned a CAPE industry certification

School Grades Scale Grade Scale A 62% of total points or higher B 54% to 61% of total points C 41% to 53% of total points D 32% to 40% of total points F 31% of total points or less The State Board of Education sets the scale and must, per state law, periodically review the scale to determine whether the expectations should be raised to encourage increased student achievement If the Board adjusts the grading scale upward, it must inform the public and the school districts of the reasons for the adjustment and the anticipated impact on school grades

Calculating the School Grade The school’s grade is determined by Summing the points earned for each component (each component is worth 100 points) and dividing by the sum of total points available for all components with sufficient data The percentage resulting is the percentage of points the school earned from all applicable components This percentage is compared to the scale set by the State Board of Education to determine a school’s grade

School Grades Model Other Topics Per state law, if two or more schools operate at the same facility (collocated schools), and at least one of the collocated schools does not earn a school grade or a rating because of insufficient data, the performance data across all the schools at the same location are combined to calculate a school grade (s. 1008.34(3)(a)3, F.S.) This provision results in more schools being included in school accountability

Florida Standards Alternate Assessment Results were included in the 2017-18 school grades Went through rulemaking process in 2017-18 Set the passing scores to use in the achievement measures for U.S. History and Civics Determined the learning gains methodology Workshops were held in Spring 2017 Adopted by the State Board in January 2018

Every Student Succeeds Act

ESSA State Plan Approval Drafted with public input, including workgroup of superintendents No changes to Florida’s state accountability systems Preserves the focus on increased student achievement Adds a Federal calculation to satisfy ESSA requirements Approved September 26, 2018

Recent Successes Only state to significantly improve on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in 4th and 8th grade math and 8th grade reading 1st among states in Advanced Placement participation 4th in the nation in Advanced Placement performance 4th in the nation for K-12 Student Achievement according to Education Week Quality Counts report Graduation rate at an all-time high of 82.3%

Sections of the State Plan Title I, Part A: Assessment, Accountability, and School Improvement Title I, Part C: Migrant Students Title I, Part D: Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk Students Title II, Part A: Supporting Effective Instruction Title III, Part A: English Language Learners Title IV, Part A: Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants Title IV, Part B: 21st Century Community Learning Centers Title V, Part B, Subpart 2: Rural and Low-Income School Program Title VII, Subpart B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act

Accountability Calculation of new Federal percent of points index Includes all school grades components plus English Language Proficiency progress English Language Proficiency progress – the percent of ELLs who make progress on ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 ELLs who increase their composite proficiency level or Remain at a composite score of 4, 5, or 6 Calculated for all schools including ESE, Alternative, and DJJ K-3 schools that don’t receive their own index will receive the Federal percent of points index of the school to which a majority of their students matriculate, as is currently done for the school grade for school recognition purposes Calculated overall and by subgroup

Subgroups Subgroups include: Economically disadvantaged students Major racial and ethnic groups (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska native, and two or more races) Students with disabilities English Language Learners (ELLs)

Federal Percent of Points Index ESSA Indicator Florida Component Academic Achievement – including Student Growth English Language Arts (ELA) Achievement Mathematics Achievement Learning Gains ELA Learning Gains Mathematics Learning Gains Lowest 25% ELA Learning Gains Lowest 25% Mathematics Graduation Rate 4-Year Graduation Rate School Quality or Student Success Science Social Studies Middle School – Acceleration High School – College and Career Acceleration Progress in Achieving English Language Proficiency (ELP) ELP Progress

Middle School Federal Percent of Points Index School Quality Indicator ESSA Indicator Florida Component Points School Quality or Student Success (320 points) Science 100 points Social Studies Middle School Acceleration Mathematics Achievement (20 points) Acceleration Success (100 points) 120 points The mathematics achievement component is included as part of the middle school acceleration measure (20 points), as well as under the academic achievement indicator (80 points), for a total weight of 100 points in the Federal index.

High School Federal Percent of Points Index School Quality Indicator ESSA Indicator Florida Component Points School Quality or Student Success (320 points) Science 100 points Social Studies College and Career Acceleration 4-Year Graduation Rate (20 points) Acceleration Success (100 points) 120 points The 4-year graduation rate is included as part of the college and career acceleration measure (20 points), as well as under the graduation rate indicator (80 points), for a total weight of 100 points in the federal index.

School Improvement Federal Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CS&I) Federal Targeted Support and Improvement (TS&I) Current grade “D” Differentiated Accountability (DA) Support Current grade “F” DA Support Not “D” or “F” but graduation rate 67% or lower Not “D” or “F” but overall Federal percent of points index 40% or lower Tiered Support A TS&I school with a subgroup Federal percent of points index 40% or lower for 6 years Any subgroup performance on Federal percent of points index 31% or lower over 3 years Tiered Support Any subgroup performance on Federal percent of points index 40% or lower in the current year (moves to CS&I after 6 years)

State, District, and School Report Cards Developing a new interactive report card that will provide the federally required components for the state, district, and school report cards It will include the information that is now accessed through SPARS in a more accessible format for parents and the general public Includes the following: School grade and school grade components, and Federal index Components disaggregated by subgroup State, District, School level English Language Proficiency Progress Whether the school was identified for support Anticipated December 2018

Percent Tested Schools testing less than 95% of their students, overall or by subgroup, will have to review their testing practices and submit a plan for change to achieve 95% tested Schools testing less than 95% will have the achievement denominators for ELA and Math increased to 95% for the Federal index calculation

Other Assessment and Accountability Information Recently arrived ELLs: Test all in 1st year (90% of ELLs did this in 2017-18) Learning gains counted in 2nd year Achievement counted in 3rd year Increase the federal accountability reporting period for former ELLs from two years to four years Use State Board of Education strategic plan for long-term goals; added subgroup data Additionally, included long-term goals for ELLs on the ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 English Language Proficiency assessment

EDStats Portal https://edstats.fldoe.org

What is EDStats? It is the Florida PK-20 Education Information Portal, which schools and the public have started referring to as EDStats Currently, it provides access to: Statewide assessment data School and district grades reports High school graduation rates PK-12 enrollment data PK-12 fine arts reports Florida College System data (select course enrollments and graduation rates) FETPIP data

What is EDStats? Provides interactive state, district, and school/college data in the following formats: Tables Graphs Maps Report Cards The drilldown options are slightly different across reports. PK-20 reports provide the following drilldown options and additional options pending on the area (e.g., grade level in K-12 or age group in FCS): Race/Ethnicity Gender Disability Status English Language Learner Status/LEP Status

Where is EDStats? https://edstats.fldoe.org Linked to: Accountability page (http://fldoe.org/accountability/) FSA homepage on DOE website (http://fldoe.org/accountability/assessments/k-12-student-assessment/fsa.stml) School grades homepage (http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/) Students’ data publications and reports homepage (http://fldoe.org/accountability/data-sys/edu-info-accountability-services/pk-12-public-school-data-pubs-reports/students.stml) Florida College System “Access Data” page (https://www.floridacollegesystem.com/data.aspx)

Main Page Important notes regarding bookmarking and compatibility

Main Page Use tabs or sector icons to navigate

PK-12 Interactive Reports Select an interactive report in the Assessments section for this portion of the training if you wish to use PK-12 data Takes users out of the portal to reports on DOE site

Manipulating the Preset Data Table Drag Drop Expand

Search Schools Using Maps

Example of a School Report Card Helpful Resources