Supplementary Fig. S1 1st ChIP 2nd ChIP Pol II Snf1 *

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Figure 1. mRNA induction/repression kinetics of HXK1, GAL1::FMP27 and INO1 (A) RT-qPCR analysis of HXK1 kinetic response to Galactose induction.
Advertisements

Ct log DNA ( pmol) P1P2 Supplementary Fig. S1 Standard curve of the PCR amplification efficiency of transcripts.
BY4742  yhr087w YPDYP25YPD KCl 1MYP30 S.1 Defects of the YHR087W deletion mutant under osmotic stress conditions. Growth of the BY4742 and  yhr087w strains.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics MCB 317 Topic 10, part 6 A Story of Transcription.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
by Kumar Kotlo, Douglas E. Hughes, Victoria L. M
Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Wild‐type p53 binds and represses Rad51 promoter.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Histone deacetylase inhibitors increase microRNA-146a expression and enhance negative regulation of interleukin-1β signaling in osteoarthritis fibroblast-like.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Histone Acetylation Regulates the Time of Replication Origin Firing
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Cdk1 Triggers Association of RNA Polymerase to Cell Cycle Promoters Only after Recruitment of the Mediator by SBF  Maria Pia Cosma, Silvia Panizza, Kim.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Conserved Histone Variant H2A
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Ordered Recruitment of Transcription and Chromatin Remodeling Factors to a Cell Cycle– and Developmentally Regulated Promoter  Maria Pia Cosma, Tomoyuki.
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
A Transient Histone Hyperacetylation Signal Marks Nucleosomes for Remodeling at the PHO8 Promoter In Vivo  Hans Reinke, Philip D. Gregory, Wolfram Hörz 
Global Position and Recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the Yeast Genome
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses and Dnmt2–EGFP relocalizes and interacts with DCV RNA during infection. Dnmt2 mutants show delayed immune responses.
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Epigenetic Silencing Mediates Mitochondria Stress-Induced Longevity
Histone H2A.Z Regulates Transcription and Is Partially Redundant with Nucleosome Remodeling Complexes  Maria Soledad Santisteban, Tatyana Kalashnikova,
Fig. 4 p100/TSN enables E2F1 to interact with alternatively spliced transcripts. p100/TSN enables E2F1 to interact with alternatively spliced transcripts.
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Feng Xu, Kangling Zhang, Michael Grunstein  Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding.
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Tomoyuki Tanaka, Dunja Knapp, Kim Nasmyth  Cell 
DDX5 localizes to promoters of DNA replication genes and functions in the loading of RNA polymerase II onto these promoters. DDX5 localizes to promoters.
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Supplementary Fig. S1 1st ChIP 2nd ChIP Pol II Snf1 * Analysis of PolII and Snf1 occupancy at the ADH2 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed with Snf1-HA tagged strain KBY100. Cells were collected in repressing conditions (R = 3% glucose) and at 1 h after the shift to derepressing conditions (0.05% glucose). Cross-linked protein–DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated using first antibody against PolII enzyme, followed by immunoprecipitation with antibody against HA. DNA was amplified by real-time PCR using the following primer pairs: Fw 5’ACCATCCACTTCACGAGACTGA3’ and Rev 5’AAAAGTCGCTACTGGCACTC3’ to detect the ADH2 promoter, and Fw 5’GCGTAACAAAGCCATAATGCCTCC3’ and Rev 5’CTCGTTAGGATCACGTTCGAATCC3’ to detect TEL06R. Histograms show the occupancy of each protein at the ADH2 promoter relative to the control telomeric sequence, both in repressing (white) and derepressing (black) conditions. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of data obtained from 3 biological replicates of samples. *p<0.05; ns, not significant for p<0.05, but significant for p<0.1. 1st ChIP 2nd ChIP Occupancy ADH2 promoter/telomer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pol II R 1h Snf1 * ns

Supplementary Fig. S2 1st ChIP 2nd ChIP Pol II Snf1 Gal83 * * R 1h R Occupancy ACS1 promoter/telomer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R 1h Pol II * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R 1h Snf1 Gal83 * Occupancy ACS1 promoter/telomer Analysis of Snf1, Gal83 and PolII occupancy at the ACS1 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed with Snf1-HA KBY100 and Gal83-HA KBY98 strains. Cells were collected in repressing conditions (R = 3% glucose) and at 1 h after the shift to derepressing conditions (0.05% glucose). Cross-linked protein–DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated using first antibody against PolII enzyme, followed by immunoprecipitation with antibody against HA. DNA was amplified by real-time PCR using the following primer pairs: Fw 5’CACTCACCTGTTGACATGCC3’ and Rev5’ TATTTGCCACCGAGGAACTGT3’ to detect the ACS1 promoter, and Fw 5’GCGTAACAAAGCCATAATGCCTCC3’ and Rev 5’CTCGTTAGGATCACGTTCGAATCC3’ to detect TEL06R. Histograms show the occupancy of each protein at the ACS1 promoter relative to the control telomeric sequence, both in repressing (white) and derepressing (black) conditions. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of data obtained from 3 biological replicates of samples. *p<0.05.

Supplementary Fig. S3 Gcn5-Myc Rpd3-Myc Analysis of Gcn5 and Rpd3 occupancy at the ADH2 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed with Gcn5-myc tagged SNF1 and snf1 deletion mutant strains (KBY95 and KBY105, respectively) and Rpd3-myc tagged SNF1 and snf1 deletion mutant strains (KBY97 and KBY107, respectively). Cells were collected in repressing conditions (R = 3% glucose) and at 1 h after the shift to derepressing conditions (0.05% glucose). Cross-linked protein–DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated using antibody against c-myc. DNA was amplified by real-time PCR using the following primer pairs: Fw 5’GAGTGCCAGTAGCGACTTTTT3’ and Rev 5’ACTTGCCGTTGGATTCGTAG3’ to detect the ADH2 promoter, and Fw 5’GCGTAACAAAGCCATAATGCCTCC3’ and Rev 5’CTCGTTAGGATCACGTTCGAATCC3’ to detect TEL06R. H. Histograms show the occupancy of each protein at the ADH2 promoter relative to a control telomeric sequence, both in repressing (white) and derepressing (black) conditions. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of data obtained from 3 biological replicates of samples.

Supplementary Fig. S4 Gcn5-Myc Rpd3-Myc Analysis of Gcn5 and Rpd3 occupancy at the ACS1 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed with Gcn5-myc tagged SNF1 and snf1 deletion mutant strains (KBY95 and KBY105, respectively) and Rpd3-myc tagged SNF1 and snf1 deletion mutant strains (KBY97 and KBY107, respectively). Cells were collected in repressing conditions (R = 3% glucose) and at 1 h after the shift to derepressing conditions (0.05% glucose). Cross-linked protein–DNA complexes were immunoprecipitated using antibody against c-myc. DNA was amplified by real-time PCR using the following primer pairs: Fw 5’TCGGTGGCAAATAGTTCTCC3’ and Rev 5’AGAGGGCGACATAGCACAGT3’ to detect the ACS1 promoter, and Fw 5’GCGTAACAAAGCCATAATGCCTCC3’ and Rev 5’CTCGTTAGGATCACGTTCGAATCC3’ to detect TEL06R. H. Histograms show the occupancy of each protein at the ACS1 promoter relative to a control telomeric sequence, both in repressing (white) and derepressing (black) conditions. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of data obtained from 3 biological replicates of samples.