Fig. 2. Mutant KRAS mediates resistance to PARPi and sensitivity to PARPi and MEKi Mutant KRAS mediates resistance to PARPi and sensitivity to PARPi and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics Authors: Anil Potti et. al Presenter: Jong Cheol Jeong.
Advertisements

Table S1. Hypoxia increases signaling through JNK in colon cancer cell lines in a cell-specific manner Shown are the ratios of c-Jun phosphorylation during.
A B Supplementary Figure 1. (A) Western blots were performed on the three cell lines to analyze the levels of p-ERK, which is a key protein involved in.
Kui Wang May 6th, 2017.
WEE1 inhibition forces S-phase–arrested cancer cells into mitosis.
Fig. 8. Recurrent copy number amplification of BRD4 gene was observed across common cancers. Recurrent copy number amplification of BRD4 gene was observed.
Figure 1: Assessment of eribulin activity in twenty-five cell lines
Fig. 2. Effects of AZD4785 on proliferation and MAPK pathway signaling in KRAS mutant and wild-type cancer cells in vitro. Effects of AZD4785 on proliferation.
Synergistic action of dual IGF1/R and MEK inhibition sensitizes childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells to cytotoxic agents and involves downregulation.
Fig. 1. Generation of ERY974. Generation of ERY974. (A) Schematic illustration of ERY974 structure and the introduced mutations. The two Fab arms share.
Fig. 6. AZD6738 induces DNA damage and apoptosis and exhibits antitumor efficacy in xenograft models of high-risk medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma. AZD6738.
PARPi combinations against HR-proficient tumors.
Differentiation of AZD4785 from MAPK pathway inhibitors in vitro
Fig. 1. Potent and selective down-regulation of KRAS mRNA and protein by AZD4785 in vitro and in vivo. Potent and selective down-regulation of KRAS mRNA.
A FOXO3a-BIM cascade mediates sensitivity to PARP and MEK inhibition
BET inhibition and depletion repress the expression of BRCA1 and RAD51
Fig. 5. Correlation of tail and long bone growth velocities with Cxm serum concentrations in mice. Correlation of tail and long bone growth velocities.
Fig. 2. In vitro profiling of tEV markers on cell line–derived EVs.
Fig. 4. Functional annotation of VUS in EGFR.
Synergistic effect of S63845 with lapatinib, trastuzumab, or docetaxel
Fig. 1. PARPi and MEKi induce inverse adaptive responses.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
RAS/RAF pathway-activated ovarian cancer cells exhibit MEK dependence and synergistic induction of apoptosis with combined MEK/AKT inhibition. RAS/RAF.
AKT dependence of ovarian cancer cell lines.
Drug network derived from the core EGFR interactome and combination strategy to overcome the resistant cells. Drug network derived from the core EGFR interactome.
Fig. 1 Chemical inactivation of BPL kills Mtb and prevents growth in mouse macrophages. Chemical inactivation of BPL kills Mtb and prevents growth in mouse.
* * * A B D C E CP110 Tubulin WB: CP110 WB: HA CP110 KRAS Tubulin
Allele-specific inhibitors inactivate mutant KRAS G12C by a trapping mechanism by Piro Lito, Martha Solomon, Lian-Sheng Li, Rasmus Hansen, and Neal Rosen.
Fig. 5 Analysis of metabolite changes in M
Identification of bioactive compounds modulating STING activation
Fig. 7 Gel scaffold for inhibition of postsurgical recurrence of B16F10 tumors. Gel scaffold for inhibition of postsurgical recurrence of B16F10 tumors.
Fig. 6. Safety assessment in cynomolgus monkey.
Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic lethal screen with PRMT5 inhibitor EPZ in H2171 cell line. (A) A pie chart ... Figure 1. A CRISPR/Cas9 synthetic.
Inhibition of CDK6 kinase activity sensitizes EOC cells to platinum in vitro Inhibition of CDK6 kinase activity sensitizes EOC cells to platinum in vitro.
Fig. 4. BET inhibition sensitizes HR-proficient tumors to PARPi treatment in vivo. BET inhibition sensitizes HR-proficient tumors to PARPi treatment in.
Fig. 4. Actin polymerization rhythms are required for circadian regulation of adhesion and wound-healing efficacy by fibroblasts. Actin polymerization.
Fig. 3. AD80 is active against gatekeeper mutant RETV804M cells.
Fig. 5 EGFR mutation status of patients with NSCLC, detected by histological examination and ARMS PCR. EGFR mutation status of patients with NSCLC, detected.
Fig. 6. FGFR1 and CCND1 amplification–mediated resistance to estrogen deprivation is therapeutically actionable. FGFR1 and CCND1 amplification–mediated.
Fig. 1. Drug combination screen identifies BETi as acting synergistically with PARPi. Drug combination screen identifies BETi as acting synergistically.
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Fig. 2 Paralog-selective inhibitors of GSK3α and GSK3β were designed and characterized. Paralog-selective inhibitors of GSK3α and GSK3β were designed and.
Fig. 4. Improved tumor response to docetaxel in TNBC and trastuzumab in HER2-amplified PDX models with the addition of S Improved tumor response.
Fig. 5. Nutlin-3 treatment rescues the proliferation and differentiation of NPCs in vitro. Nutlin-3 treatment rescues the proliferation and differentiation.
Fig. 3. TKI sensitivity assessed by the MANO method.
Fig. 4 Surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response that triggers the outgrowth of distant immunogenic tumors and can be inhibited by perioperative.
Fig. 1 LB100 and LB102 specifically inhibit PP2A phosphatase activity and the growth of BCR-ABL+ cells. LB100 and LB102 specifically inhibit PP2A phosphatase.
Correlation of reovirus RNA/protein with proliferating tumor cells
Confirmation of synergy and cytotoxicity of genotype-selective drug pairs. Confirmation of synergy and cytotoxicity of genotype-selective drug pairs. A,
Cell viability assay in NSCLC cell lines in response to gefitinib and Taxol. Cell viability assay in NSCLC cell lines in response to gefitinib and Taxol.
Fig. 2. BET inhibition enhances PARPi-induced DNA damage.
Differentiation of AZD4785 from MAPK pathway inhibitors in vitro
Fig. 2. Clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations in various tumor types. Clinically actionable somatic genomic alterations in various tumor types.
Fig. 5. Mutant KRAS increases HR capacity and MEKi decreases HR capacity in RAS mutant cells, causing increased DNA damage. Mutant KRAS increases HR capacity.
Antitumor efficacy of PI3K inhibitor NVP-BKM120 alone and in combination with olaparib. Antitumor efficacy of PI3K inhibitor NVP-BKM120 alone and in combination.
Inhibition of lung cancer cell proliferation and viability by CYT387.
GR cells are dependent upon sustained CDC25C signaling as pharmacologic or genetic inhibition of CDC25C induce synthetic lethality. GR cells are dependent.
PD and efficacy of AZD4785 in KRAS mutant lung cancer xenograft models
Fig. 3. AD80 is active against gatekeeper mutant RETV804M cells.
CDs with KRASG12C cooperatively sustain downstream signaling outputs to promote survival and proliferation. CDs with KRASG12C cooperatively sustain downstream.
KRAS mutation leads to resistance to combined RAF/EGFR and RAF/MEK inhibition. KRAS mutation leads to resistance to combined RAF/EGFR and RAF/MEK inhibition.
Quantitative PTEN protein expression is associated with pertuzumab sensitivity in vitro and trastuzumab resistance in vivo. Quantitative PTEN protein expression.
No single ALK mutations confer high-level resistance to lorlatinib.
Validation of MYC-driven drug responses.
Blocking αvβ3/galectin-3 binding with GCS-100 selectively kills KRAS-addicted lung cancer cells. Blocking αvβ3/galectin-3 binding with GCS-100 selectively.
Global analysis of the chemical–genetic interaction map.
MTOR kinase inhibition–induced reactivation of AKT substrates is HER2 and PI3K dependent. mTOR kinase inhibition–induced reactivation of AKT substrates.
Combining IGF1R inhibitors with MEK or RAF inhibitors enhances the differential impact upon mutant KRAS cells. Combining IGF1R inhibitors with MEK or RAF.
AXL is not necessary for maintenance of intrinsic resistance.
PD and efficacy of AZD4785 in a KRAS wild-type lung cancer PDX model
Presentation transcript:

Fig. 2. Mutant KRAS mediates resistance to PARPi and sensitivity to PARPi and MEKi Mutant KRAS mediates resistance to PARPi and sensitivity to PARPi and MEKi (A) Drug response curves for BMN673 combined with AZD6244 in 24 well-characterized ovarian cancer cell lines treated with varying concentrations of the two compounds for 96 hours. CI was calculated using CalcuSyn software with the Chou-Talalay equation. CI values reflect the sign and magnitude of drug-drug interaction: synergy, <0.5; additivity, 0.5 to 1; antagonism, >1. Red cell line name: synergy (CI, <0.5); blue cell line name: cells intrinsically sensitive to PARPi; black cell line name: cells exhibited modest to no response to either single or combination treatment. (B) Top: Percentage of cell viability at 10 μM BMN673 from (A). Bottom: Selected mutations in cell lines. KRAS and BRCA2 correlations with BMN673 response were significant (P = 4.7 × 10−5 and P = 0.023, respectively). (C) Top: Percentage of cell growth inhibition by AZD6244 from (A). Bottom: Selected mutations in cell lines. KRAS correlation with AZD6244 response was significant (P = 0.026). (D) Correlation between IC50 of BMN673 and AZD6244 (Pearson’s r = −0.412; P = 0.049). (E) Top: CI values; cells were arranged by CI into synergistic (green) and nonsynergistic (red) (cutoff, 0.5) based on (A). Bottom: Selected mutations in cell lines. KRAS mutation is correlated with synergistic effect between PARPi and MEKi (P = 3 × 10−6). (F) Interactions between BMN673 and AZD6244 (MEKi), GSK1120212B (MEKi), SCH772984 (ERKi), GSK2118436A (BRAFi), SP600125 (JNKi), PD0332991 (CDK4/6 inhibitor), and BKM120 [PI3K inhibitor (PI3Ki)] were examined across a panel of 10 cell lines including 8 RAS mutant lines and 2 RAS wild-type lines (cell line data in fig. S3, A and B). (G) Response of Ba/F3 cells rendered interleukin-3–independent with KRAS_WT, KRASG12D, KRASG12V, or PIK3CAH1047R to BMN673 and AZD6244/SCH772984. (H) Heat map of CI of combinations of BMN673 with AZD6244 and SCH772984 from (G). Combinations with BMN673 and GSK2118436A (BRAFi) and SP600125 (JNKi) are also presented. Chaoyang Sun et al., Sci Transl Med 2017;9:eaal5148 Published by AAAS