Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: 802.15 TG10 (L2R) Opening & Closing Report for July 2015 Date Submitted: July 2015 Source: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC Contact: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC Voice: +1 480-586-8457, E-Mail: cpowell@ieee.org Re: TG10 (L2R) Opening & Closing Report for July2015 Abstract: Opening & Closing Report for the TG10 (L2R) Sessions in Waikoloa Purpose: Layer 2 (Mesh Under) Routing Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Page 1

TG10 OPENING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 ----- Meeting Notes (17/01/2011 11:38) ----- Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS Page 2

Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 802.15 TG10 (L2R) Project: Draft a recommended practice for Layer 2 Routing of Dynamically Changing 802.15.4 Mesh Networks. Leadership: Chair – Clint Powell Technical Editor – Verotiana Rabarijaona Secretary – Charlie Perkins ----- Meeting Notes (17/01/2011 11:38) ----- Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS Page 3

Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search

Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Material about the patent policy is available at http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/materials.html If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee.org or visit http://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/index.html This slide set is available at https://development.standards.ieee.org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset.ppt

Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted

Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. --------------------------------------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

Meeting Goals Recap May 802.15 Interim and Current Status Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Meeting Goals Recap May 802.15 Interim and Current Status Agenda and Mins. Approval Continue Resolving Comments from LB 104 See priority List on next slide Re-Establish TG10 BRC Solicit Input for Update w/802.1 to Occur Tues. (6-7pm) TG10 Update to 802.1 in Joint 802.15/802.1 Session Page 8

Waikoloa Comment Resolution Topics (1/2) Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Waikoloa Comment Resolution Topics (1/2) Security #118, 165, 293. 297, 298, 306, 307: WiP #163, 336, 366, 367, 500, 514: Approved-RDN #331, R63, R131, R139, R140, R141, R165: not addressed at all, but the resolutions of the other comments will ripple through the clauses concerned Topology Construction #85, 86, 91, 98, 125, 137, 171: WiP #492, 511, 535, 539, 541, 544, 550: Approved-RDN #147, 148, 151 (Address assignment), R65, R185: not addressed yet #38, 123, 130, 498, 513, 534, 536, 549: not addressed yet but the comments are from the BRC members so they can be addressed during a call NLM IE #394 Metrics #373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, R195, R196: WiP Page 9

Waikoloa Comment Resolution Topics (2/2) Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Waikoloa Comment Resolution Topics (2/2) Sequence number #257, R19, R20, R116, R156, R201, R212, R225 IE related / Discovery: #342, 345 Brother routing R41, R42, R164 ANA related comments: #315, 317, 318, R146, R150 Routing R97, R98, R106 Data aggregation: #579 Page 10

TG10 Timeline Letter Ballot – March/April 2015 Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 TG10 Timeline Letter Ballot – March/April 2015 1st Letter Ballot Recrc. – July/Aug. 2015 2nd Letter Ballot Recrc. – Sept./Oct. 2015 3rd Letter Ballot Recrc.* – Nov./Dec. 2015 WG Sponsor Ballot Approval – Nov.. 2015 EC Sponsor Ballot Approval – Nov. 2015 Sponsor Ballot – Dec. 2015/Jan. 2016 1st Sponsor Ballot Recrc. – March/April 2016 2nd Sponsor Ballot Recrc. – May/June 2016 3rd Sponsor Ballot Recrc.* – June/July 2016 EC Approval – July 2016 RevCom Approval – Aug. 2016 * May not be needed Page 11

TG10 CLOSING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 ----- Meeting Notes (17/01/2011 11:38) ----- Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS Page 12

Meeting Status Recapped May 802.15 Interim and Current Status Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Meeting Status Recapped May 802.15 Interim and Current Status Agenda and Mins. Approved Continued Resolving Comments from LB 104 Re-Established TG10 BRC Solicited Input for Update w/802.1 (Occurring in July) Gave TG10 Update to 802.1 in Joint 802.15/802.1 Session Page 13

TG10 Motion 1 Motion to form a TG10 BRC. Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 TG10 Motion 1 Motion to form a TG10 BRC. TG10 requests that 802.15 WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the WG balloting of the 802.15.4 TG10 draft recommended practice with the following membership: Clint Powell, Verotiana Rabarijaona, Fumihide Kojima, Noriyuki Sato, Kiyoshi Fukui, Soo-Young Chang, Jaehwan Kim, SangSung Cho, Charlie Perkins. The TG10 BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of balloting the TG10 draft on behalf of the 802.15 WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector email and via teleconferences as announced to the reflector at least 30 days in advance. Moved by: abc Seconded by: xyz Discussion: None Vote: c/d/e - Unanimous Page 14

Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Minutes Minutes - doc. # 15-15-0xxx-00 Page 15

Looking Forward Between Now and Bangkok Mtg. in Sept. Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Looking Forward Between Now and Bangkok Mtg. in Sept. 1st Letter Ballot Recirculation 1st Letter Ballot Recirculation Comment Resolution At Bangkok Mtg. in Sept. Finalize Comment Resolutions to be Applied to Draft in Preparation for 2nd Letter Ballot Recirculation Seek TG and WG Approvals of TG10 BRC Page 16

Looking Forward (cont’d.) Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 Looking Forward (cont’d.) After Bangkok Mtg. 1st Letter Ballot Recirculation Comment Resolution 2nd Letter Ballot Recirculation 2nd Letter Ballot Recirculation Comment Resolution Next Juncture w/802.1 Update at Joint 802.1/802.15 Session in Nov. Mtg. Page 17

TG10 Conference Calls Reminder Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 TG10 Conference Calls Reminder TG10 Standing Conference Call Info Day: Mon. Next Call: 25th, May Time: 6PM (Pacific) 10AM Tues. (Japan-JST, Korea) Conf. #: To Be Sent to TG10 Reflector Page 18

TG10 Motion 1 to WG Motion for WG approval to form TG10 BRC. Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10 TG10 Motion 1 to WG Motion for WG approval to form TG10 BRC. Move that 802.15 WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the WG balloting of the TG10 draft recommended practice with the following membership: Clint Powell, Verotiana Rabarijaona, Fumihide Kojima, Noriyuki Sato, Kiyoshi Fukui, Soo-Young Chang, Jaehwan Kim, SangSung Choi, Charlie Perkins. The TG10 BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of balloting the TG10 draft on behalf of the 802.15 WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector email and via teleconferences as announced to the reflector at least 30 days in advance. Moved by: Clint Powell Seconded by: Page 19