Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shaker training March 2011 Renard Klubnik Applications engineer The information contained in this document is the property of Meggitt Sensing Systems and.
Advertisements

Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Shock Special Topics Unit 42 Vibrationdata 1.Accidental Drop Shock 2.Half-Sine Shock on Drop Tower 3.Half-Sine Shock on Shaker Table 4.Waveform Reconstructions.
Mechanical Vibrations
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
Unit 6: Structural vibration An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Structural vibration Learning summary By the end of this chapter you should.
Simple Harmonic Motion
Chapter 14 Oscillations Chapter Opener. Caption: An object attached to a coil spring can exhibit oscillatory motion. Many kinds of oscillatory motion are.
Ae105c CDR, June 3, 2009 p. 1 Ae105c Term Project CDR Team report from Experimental Team Jason Cerundolo Vivek Viswanathan Pelayo Bohorquez.
Fundamentals of Physics
U U 1 Excitation of Structural Resonance Due to a Bearing Failure Robert A. Leishear David B. Stefanko Jerald D. Newton IMECE 2007 ASME, International.
Introduction to Structural Dynamics:
Oscillation.
Chapter 13 Oscillatory Motion.
Halliday/Resnick/Walker Fundamentals of Physics 8th edition
Shock and Vibration Testing
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
PRE-REQUISITE: ENGINEERING MECHANICS/STATIC ERT250 DYNAMICS.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 7.9 Examples of forced vibration.
Development of Light Weight Composite Constraining Layers for Aircraft Skin Damping RAM 7 Workshop November 4 & 5, 2014 Nick Oosting Roush Industries
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
1 Abstract A set of guidelines for circuit layout to consider is presented, as it relates to structural concepts. Namely, shock and vibration environments.
Resonant Column Test The resonant column test is the most commonly used laboratory test for measuring the low-strain properties of soils It subjects solid.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
Rene Herrmann Compounding and Composites. FEM static load analyzes The purpose of the static test is to define areas of large strain. It is these areas.
Lesson 13 Mechanical Shock 第 13 课 机械冲击. Contents Introduction The Free Falling Package Mechanical Shock Theory Shock Duration Shock Amplification and.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 14 Oscillations.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Oscillations of a Spring Simple Harmonic Motion Energy in the Simple Harmonic Oscillator The Simple Pendulum Lecture.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
NESC Academy Response to Classical Pulse Excitation Unit 23.
Lesson 14 Test Method for Product Fragility 第 14 课 产品脆值试验方法.
Dongling Products Presentation Vibration & Shock Test Solutions © Femaris
Chapter 15 Oscillations. Periodic motion Periodic (harmonic) motion – self-repeating motion Oscillation – periodic motion in certain direction Period.
1 1 bd Systems, Inc. Advanced Technology Division Waveform Reconstruction via Wavelets October 2005 Revision B bd Systems, Inc. Advanced Technology Division.
ANCHORAGE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS George Mouchahoir Office of Performance Standards National Highway Traffic Safety Administration May, 2002.
Periodic Motions.
Simple Harmonic Motion
Newton’s 1 st Law: More Practice.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
1 10. Harmonic oscillator Simple harmonic motion Harmonic oscillator is an example of periodic motion, where the displacement of a particle from.
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Model Reduction & Interface Modeling in Dynamic Substructuring Application to a Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbine MSc. Presentation Paul van der Valk.
Mechanical Vibrations
Unit 3 Vibrationdata Sine Sweep Vibration.
Dead zone analysis of ECAL barrel modules under static and dynamic loads Marc Anduze, Thomas Pierre Emile – LLR CALICE Collaboration Meeting.
10. Harmonic oscillator Simple harmonic motion
Unit 1B Shaker Table Testing.
Different kinds of energy
Updated Velocity Data for undamped panel 2
DVT 3-D Shaker System in House Ready for Testing
Common Small Pedestal Motor and Bearing Requirements. Introduction
Oscillatory Motion.
Femap Structural Analysis Toolkit (SATK)
Lecture 3: Vibration in Transport presented by David Shires
1/10 prototype support tube
3 General forced response
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
An elevator supported by a single cable descends a shaft at a constant speed. The only forces acting on the elevator are the tension in the cable.
LECTURE 1 – FUNDAMENTAL OF VIBRATION
Lecture 2: Frequency & Time Domains presented by David Shires
Packaging Dynamics Lecture 5: Fatigue, Test Acceleration and Product Fragility presented by David Shires Editor-in-Chief, Packaging Technology & Science.
Newton’s 1st Law: More Practice
Thought for the day “Engineering is the art of modelling
Gravity & Free-Fall.
Chapter 15 Oscillations.
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Simple Harmonic Motion and Wave Interactions
Sales Meeting February 2002 Brüel & Kjær Vibro GmbH VT-60 R.4 & xms R.1 Folie 1 The powerful tool for detection and analysis of amplitude modulation. To.
Presentation transcript:

Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection 1/17/2019

Determining Shaker Sizing Proper Shaker selection requires application of Newton’s Second Law of Motion: Force = Mass x Acceleration (F=MA) Vibration systems have output forces ratings defined in terms of: Sine force: lbs (kN) peak Random force: lbs (kN) rms Shock force: lbs (kN) peak 1/17/2019

Applying Newton’s Law In Shaker Selection Suitability of a Specific Test System can be evaluated in terms of the following: Force Requirement (lbf) UUT + Fixture + Armature x G = F x 1.30= Desired Force Shaker System Maximum Displacement Determined by test environment Maximum Velocity 1/17/2019

F=ma Determining Moving MASS The mass value (M) in the initial formula of F = MA must include all moving masses attached to the shaker armature surface including the armature mass itself: shaker armature + head expander or slip plate with its driver bar + test specimen + specimen interface fixture, including bolts and bearing stiction if the system is driving a horizontal plate using hydrostatic bearings. 1/17/2019

Determining and Evaluating Mass Test Articles, Slip Tables, Head Expanders and Fixtures Size, Mass and Frequency Response Overturning Moment/Guidance Issues (UUT+Fixture) x CG x G x Q= lbin Slide Plate: L x W x PSI (14) x effective area= lbin Desired Resonance: Frequency x (L x W)/ 209000=Thickness 1/17/2019

Specimen Specifics In addition to your test specification, the following test article data is required to determine the appropriate system for your test requirements: Specimen Description Specimen Test Mass Specimen Dimensions Specimen Center of Gravity (CG) Specimen Mounting Considerations 1/17/2019

Fixture Specifics Test fixtures effect mass and resonance and must be considered carefully. The following concerns should be addressed in selecting a shaker system: Do your fixtures exist or will they require design and fabrication? What are or will be the approximate dimensions (estimate if necessary) of the fixturing? What is or will be the approximate mass (estimate if necessary) of the fixturing? Are there any mounting issues (bolt pattern, size)? Will a head expander be required? 1/17/2019

F=ma Test Specifications The maximum Acceleration for the F = MA estimate is derived from the test specification: for Sine vibration (G-peak) for Random vibration (G-rms) for Classical Shock pulses (G-peak) The operator must be cognizant of the maximum displacement and velocity of any given test parameter to insure they don’t exceed the systems capabilities 1/17/2019

Evaluating the Test Specifications Waveform: Sine Random Classical Waveform Shock SRS Shock Mixed Mode (Sine on Random and Random on Random) Time Replication Test Magnitude Test Frequency Range Test Duration Three Axis Testing Required ? 1/17/2019

Understanding Random Vibration Random vibration stated force ratings are determined with guidance of ISO 5344. ISO 5344 specifies use of a flat 20 Hz to 2000 Hz spectrum with a test load of three to four times the armature mass. This is done to achieve continuity of ratings between different manufacturers. By use of the non-resonant three to four time armature mass load the resonant frequency of the shaker armature under test typically will fall below 2000 Hz. This enables the system to gain free energy at the higher frequencies. 1/17/2019

Real World Random Vibration Typical “real life” Random tests don’t always have test loads of three to four times the armature weight and test input profiles are gaussian in nature rather than flat. Narrow band Random profiles that don’t excite the armature resonance and have test fixtures that are highly damped may require system de-rating of up to 30%. 1/17/2019

Effects of Resonance Every mechanical structure has a resonant frequency, which may result in a significant dynamic force absorber at certain frequencies. This phenomena must be taken into account during the estimating process. The force rating defined by the manufacture is rated at the armature surface. If the test system has associated fixtures, head expanders, slip tables, etc. that act as force absorbers and have been defined as a control accelerometer locations, then the shaker may be over driven. It is always advisable to have monitor accelerometer attached to the armature surface to determine the “true force” that is being achieved. 1/17/2019

F=ma Calculating Required Force Double Click on our Microsoft Excel® Shaker Selection Calculator (next slide) for determining the minimum system force rating requirements needed for your application Fill in all applicable RED field values It is always recommended that you verify your calculations with a sales engineer prior to purchasing a system 1/17/2019

1/17/2019