TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
SPP 12 Data Collection TEA | Division of Federal and State Education Policy 1 SPP 12: Early Childhood Transition Training: Data Collection
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
SPP 12 Data Collection TEA | IDEA Coordination 1 SPP 12: Early Childhood Transition Training: Data Collection
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting (School Name) (Date)
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Training: Data Collection SPP 11: TIMELY EVALUATION SPP 11 Data Collection TEA │ IDEA Coordination 1.
CA South-African Member – User Pack The CA South African Member – User Pack contains the following Login Instruction Log CPD Hours View CPD Hours Exemption/
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
REQUEST TEASE ACCESS INDICATOR 7 Steps to Request Access to Indicator 7 through TEASE (Texas Education Agency Secure Environment) Data Collection TEA.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Indicator 13 Secondary Transition. Main Menu SPP13 has a navigation toolbar located at the top of each screen. If you use the toolbar to navigate to another.
ECSE Indicator Trainings Lunch & Learn Series PPS Training: Basics, Tips, & Tricks Wendi Schreiter.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 4 Funding Application Pages.
4/21/2014 Indicator Review 2016 June 2016.
What is Title I? How Can I Be Involved?
Early Childhood Outcomes
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
ARC Chairperson Training
What is “Annual Determination?”
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
What’s New in the IDC Part C Exiting Data Toolkit
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
NIH Public Access Policy: RPPR and MY NCBI
A Step-By-Step Tutorial for the Discipline Data Reporting Tool The Delaware Positive Behavior Support Project Slide 1:   Welcome to.
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
A Step-By-Step Tutorial for the Discipline Data Reporting Tool The Delaware Positive Behavior Support Project Slide 1:   Welcome to.
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
ARC Chairperson Training
KDE School Assurances Due October 24, 2018
How to Create and Start a Test Session
Special Education End of Year Office Hours
ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
in Correcting Noncompliance
Home Language Survey and Coding for English Learners
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Solving the Riddle That Is APR Indicator 3
2/23/2019 Special Education End-of-Year FINAL STEPS Report Review/Complete Snapshot.
Special Ed – ESE State Reporting with Skyward
Presented by: Anju Mansharamani Michele Hausmann
self-paced eLearning series
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Verification of Not Tested
Student Handbook and Code of Conduct Update: Verbal Requests for Special Education Evaluations Presented by Suzie McNeese, Ed.D., Director.
Lesson 6: Epic Appointment Scheduling Referrals
SPP 11: Timely Evaluation
Reporting Exceptions in Kronos – Desktop Users Exempt Employees
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Entering Correction Activities for 60 Day Timeline, Early Childhood Transition and Discipline Noncompliance Welcome to the presentation on how to enter.
Special Education Leadership Network Meeting January 13, 2011
Approving Time in Kronos Manager/Supervisor Reference Guide
ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System
Module 6: Parental Placement
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved?
self-paced eLearning series
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Indicator 11 Initial Evaluation Edit Checks (80 Day Timeline)
Presentation transcript:

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Indicator 11: Child Find (Timely Initial Evaluation) Choose the 2012-13 School Year Date. Section One – Complete the required information. (Calculation check: a.1. + a.2. must = a.) Section Two – Complete the required information. (b. pertains to the evaluation timeline, and c. pertains to the eligibility determination by ARD committee timeline) May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Section Three: Complete the required information. Required cells for data entry are white. All other cells (colored) automatically populate from appropriate entry cells. d. automatically populates from entry in d.1. and d.2. (pertains to evaluation reports NOT within the State established timeline) e. automatically populates from entry in e.1. and e.2. (pertains to the eligibility determination by ARD committee NOT within the State established timeline) f. automatically populates from entry in f.1. – f.6. (pertains to reasons for delays counted in d. and e. and must = d. + e.) For f.6. Other, a brief description must be added. District Percentage against 100% State target is automatically calculated based on the federally required indicator measurement. All data collected does not automatically calculate into compliance percentage, but is included for required reporting purposes. May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Calculation and Error Message examples: Section One - total in a. must equal a.1. + a.2. (example 7 + 3 = 10) Section Two – if total in b. is less than a. (example: 5<10) the difference (5) must be accounted for in d.1. and d.2. Section Two – if total in c. is less than a. (example: 0<10) the difference (10) must be accounted for in e.1. and e.2. Section Three – for any calculation total errors, a warning message will be displayed, in red, to the right of the cells affecting the total errors. (example: e.1. + e.2. must equal a. – c. and does not in this case (3 + 2 ≠ 10) Section Three – f.6. Other should generally only include reasons for delay that would be considered NON exceptions and not listed in f.1. – f.5. However, this example (weather delay) would more than likely have resulted in a waiver request from the district due to weather or other disaster like delays, and the district likely would have been granted a waiver. Those waivered days should not be counted in the state established timeline, and therefore should not be used as a reason for delay. This is a common “other” example that is NOT appropriate. (refer to explanation in PowerPoint notes) May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

Click link to pop-down help with entry calculations. Provided link to searchable help database of help topics for the SPP application Click link to pop-down help with entry calculations. Help Link: Provides link to database of help topics for the SPP application. It is searchable, as well as indexed alphabetically and by content. Users should be able to find answers to most application questions within this database. Show/Hide Instructions: Provides pop-down information, upon mouse click, pertaining to calculations and mandatory entry requirements. May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Indicator 12: Child Find (Early Childhood Transition) Choose the 2012-13 School Year Date. Section One – Complete the required information. (Include total number of children served in Part C/ECI and referred to Part B for eligibility determination regardless of when the district receives the referral from Part C/ECI) Section Two – Complete the required information. (b. pertains to the Eligibility Determinations and found NOT eligible BY their third birthday, and c. pertains to the Eligibility Determinations and found eligible BY their third birthday) Section Three – Complete the required information. (d. pertains to exceptions to timeline due to parent delays found in 34 CFR §300.300(b) or §300.301(d); and e. pertains to exceptions to timeline if the child was referred to Part C (ECI) less than 90 days before their third birthday.) Exceptions counted in Section Three are subtracted out of the compliance calculation. Required cells for data entry are white. All other cells (colored) automatically populate from appropriate entry cells. May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Section Four – Complete all the required information. Required cells for data entry are white. All other cells (colored) automatically populate from appropriate entry cells. f. automatically populates from entry in f.1. and f.2. (pertains to evaluation process completed and child determined NOT eligible AFTER their third birthday – Non-Exceptions; f.1. for 1-30 calendar days and f.2. for 31+ calendar days) g. automatically populates from entry in g.1. and g.2. (pertains to evaluation process completed and child determined eligible AFTER their third birthday – Non-Exceptions; g.1. for 1-30 calendar days and g.2. for 31+ calendar days) h. automatically populates from entry in h.1. – h.6. (pertains to reasons for delays counted in f. and g. and must = f. + g.) For h.6. Other, a brief description must be added. District Percentage against 100% State target is automatically calculated based on the federally required indicator measurement. All data collected does not automatically calculate into compliance percentage, but is included for required reporting purposes. May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy Calculation and Error Message examples: Section One - total in a. is user entered and basis for calculations (ensure accuracy) Section Two – calculates automatically with entries in b. and c. (b. + c. = Section Two) Section Three – if total in Section Two is less than a. (example: 70<100); the difference (30) must be accounted for in d., e., f., and/or g. Section Four – for any calculation total errors, a warning message will be displayed, in red, to the right of the cells affecting the total errors. (example: f. + g. must equal Section Four total (a-(b+c)-(d+e)), and does not in this case (2 + 7 ≠ 10)) Section Four – h. must equal f. + g. (example 8 ≠ 2 + 7) Section Four - h.6. Other should generally only include reasons for delay that would be considered NON exceptions and not listed in h.1. – h.5. However, this example (move to Mexico and back delay) would have resulted in a break in Part C services due to parent move. This student should not be counted in SPP 12 at all. (See SPP Indicator 12 FAQ Question # 13) This is a common “other” example that is NOT appropriate. (refer to explanation in PowerPoint notes) May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy

Click link to pop-down help with entry calculations. Provided link to searchable help database of help topics for the SPP application Click link to pop-down help with entry calculations. Help Link: Provides link to database of help topics for the SPP application. It is searchable, as well as indexed alphabetically and by content. Users should be able to find answers to most application questions within this database. Show/Hide Instructions: Provides pop-down information, upon mouse click, pertaining to calculations and mandatory entry requirements. May 2013 TEA Division of Federal and State Education Policy