Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
SPR and NMR analyses of interactions of HOIL‐1L–UBL with the HOIP–UBA derivative. SPR and NMR analyses of interactions of HOIL‐1L–UBL with the HOIP–UBA.
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Structure of the Microtubule-Binding Domain of Flagellar Dynein
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Structural Basis of Atg8 Activation by a Homodimeric E1, Atg7
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 731-743 (May 2014) Structural Basis for Proteasome Formation Controlled by an Assembly Chaperone Nas2  Tadashi Satoh, Yasushi Saeki, Takeshi Hiromoto, Ying-Hui Wang, Yoshinori Uekusa, Hirokazu Yagi, Hidehito Yoshihara, Maho Yagi- Utsumi, Tsunehiro Mizushima, Keiji Tanaka, Koichi Kato  Structure  Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 731-743 (May 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genetic and Biochemical Analysis of Nas2 Functions (A) Phenotype of Nas2 deletion mutants. Constructs for the N-terminal and C-terminal domains correspond to residues 1–120 and 121–220, respectively, in Nas2. FL, full-length Nas2 (1–220); N, N-terminal segment (1–120); C, C-terminal segment (121–220). (B) In vivo coimmunoprecipitation assay of Nas2. Proteins precipitated with FLAG-tagged Nas2 or its deletion mutants were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by CBB staining. Protein bands identified by mass spectrometry are indicated. Same sample were further analyzed by western blotting using staining with anti-Rpn2, Rpt4, Rpt5, and yeast 20S proteasome antibodies. Asterisk denotes nonspecific cross-reactive band. (C) In vitro pull-down assay of Nas2. His6-tagged Nas2 deletion mutants and full-length Rpt4 or Rpt5 were cosynthesized by a wheat germ cell-free expression system (Figure S1) and then pulled down by Ni-Sepharose resin. Input and eluted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by CBB staining. (D) SPR analysis of Nas2. PAN-Rpt5C (10.0 μM) were injected into individual NTA-biosensor chips immobilized with His6-tagged Nas2FL, His6-MBP-tagged Nas2N, and His6-MBP-tagged Nas2C121–220. In order to calculate KD values for full-length Nas2 and Nas2N, five different concentrations (0.63, 1.3, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 μM) of PAN-Rpt5C were injected over the flow cells. See also Figure S1. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crystal Structures of the Nas2 N-Domain Alone and Its Complex with the Rpt5 C-Domain (A) A ribbon model of the Nas2N. The positions of the N and C termini are indicated by blue letters. Dotted lines indicate a disordered loop. (B) Structural comparison of the C-terminal domains of four AAA+ ATPases: Rpt5 (wheat), Rpt1 (PDB code: 3VLF, gray) (Takagi et al., 2012), Rpt3 (PDB code: 2DZN, pink) (Nakamura et al., 2007), and PAN (PDB code: 3H4M, green) (Zhang et al., 2009). (C) Close-up view of the ATP-binding site of PAN-Rpt5C chimeric protein. Pyrococcus PAN AAA+ ATPase domain and Saccharomyces Rpt5C are colored gray and green, respectively. Residues of PAN-Rpt5C involved in ATP-binding are shown as stick models. (D) A ribbon model of the Nas2N-PAN-Rpt5C complex. The secondary structural elements of Nas2 and Rpt5 are labeled with black and red letters, respectively. Bound ATP is shown as stick models. Related to Figure S2. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detailed Binding Mode between Nas2N and Rpt5C (A) Close-up view of the Nas2N-Rpt5C interface showing amino acids of Nas2 (black) and Rpt5 (red). Residues of Nas2 and Rpt5 potentially involved in the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions (<4.0 Å distance) are shown as stick models. (B) SPR analysis of the interactions. His6-tagged full-length Nas2 and its point mutants were immobilized on the Sensor Chip NTA (Biacore), and PAN-Rpt5C were injected over the flow cells. All proteins were tested at a concentration of 10.0 μM. Related to Figure S3. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 NMR Analysis of Full-Length Nas2 (A) Overlay of 1H-15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled full-length Nas2 (black), Nas2N (red), and Nas2C (blue). (B) NMR chemical shift difference for full-length Nas2 in comparison with Nas2N and Nas2C. “P” and “x” indicate proline and unassigned residues, respectively. The secondary structures of the N-domain are based on the crystal structure determined in the present study, while those of the PDZ domain are predicted based on the homology model by using SWISS-MODEL homology-modeling server (Arnold et al., 2006) with GRASP55 PDZ domain (PDB code: 3RLE) (Truschel et al., 2011) as a template. (C) Plots of 1H-15N heteronuclear NOE for full-length Nas2. The heteronuclear NOE for the backbone amides of full-length Nas2 acquired at a proton frequency of 800.32 MHz. Mean NOE intensity is represented with ±SD, as shown by bars (n = 3). “P” and “x” indicate proline and unassigned residues, respectively. See also Figure S4. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 NMR Analysis of Nas2N (A) Chemical shift perturbation data for the Nas2N interacting with PAN-Rpt5C. 1H-15N HSQC spectra of [15N]Nas2 alone (red), in the presence of PAN-Rpt5C (black) are shown. (B) Mapping of the perturbed residues of Nas2 upon binding of PAN-Rpt5C. Nas2N is shown as surface representations, both top and bottom, which are rotated by 90° around the vertical axis. The residues whose NMR peaks became undetectable due to extreme broadening upon binding to PAN-Rpt5C are shown in red. Tube models of the Rpt5 C-domain and PAN AAA+ ATPase domain are shown in green and transparent cyan, respectively. Proline residues and four unassigned residues are colored in gray. (C) Chemical shift perturbation data for Nas2N on binding to PAN-Rpt5C. Yellow bars indicate residues whose NMR peaks became undetectable due to extreme broadening. “P” indicates proline residue, while “x” indicates unassigned residues and residues whose chemical shift perturbation data could not be obtained due to severe peak overlapping. The secondary structural elements are indicated above the plots. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 NMR Analysis of Nas2C (A) 1H-15N HSQC spectra of [15N]Nas2C alone (red), in the presence of the PAN-Rpt5C (left), Rpt5 (center) or Rpt4 (right) heptapeptides (black) with 1:1 molar ratio. (B) NMR chemical shift change for Nas2C with PAN-Rpt5C (top), Rpt5 (middle), and Rpt4 (bottom). Yellow bars indicate residues whose NMR peaks became undetectable due to extreme broadening upon addition of Rpt5C. (C) The perturbed residues of the Nas2 PDZ domain are colored in magenta and the color gradient indicates the strength the chemical shift perturbation: Δδ = [(ΔδH)2 + (ΔδN/5)2]1/2 (left). Residues whose NMR peaks became undetectable due to extreme broadening upon binding to PAN-Rpt5C are colored in red. Crystal structure of the syntenin PDZ domain is shown (center, PDB code: 1OBX) (Kang et al., 2003). The bound cognate ligand (IL-5Rα C-terminal peptide) is shown in the stick diagram. Proline and unassigned residues are colored in gray. The surface diagram (right) is provided in the same orientation as the ribbon diagram in (left). Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Interaction Mode among the RP-Assembly Chaperones (A) Crystal structures of assembly chaperone-RP complexes: left, Nas2-Rpt5 (red and wheat); center, Nas6-Rpt3 (cyan and pink); right, Hsm3-Rpt1 (orange and white). All RP-assembly chaperones bind to C-terminal domains of the Rpt subunits. The secondary structural elements of the Rpt subunits are labeled, highlighting the binding α helices with red letters. (B) The Nas2N-Rpt5C complex structure was superimposed on an EM model of Rpt ATPase ring (PDB code: 4B4T). Nas2N is shown as red-colored ribbon models. The Rpt ring is shown as surface representations and is colored transparent gray (Rpt1), transparent green (Rpt2), pink (Rpt3), slate (Rpt4), wheat (Rpt5), and lemon (Rpt6). See also Figure S5. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 RP Base Assembly Mechanism Mediated by Nas2 RP base assembly intermediates are formed from nine base subunits and a deubiquitylating enzyme Ubp6 (Funakoshi et al., 2009; Le Tallec et al., 2009; Saeki et al., 2009; Sakata et al., 2011; Tomko et al., 2010). First, Nas2 module makes an assembly intermediate complex with Nas6-Rpn14 module together with Rpn2. Next, incorporation of Hsm3 module triggers Nas2 dissociation from the complex through a steric hindrance between N-terminal domain of Nas2 and ATPase domains of Rpt1/Rpt2. Binding of the N-terminal domain of Nas2 on Rpt5 may prevent formation of the off-pathway products between RP intermediates and CP. In addition, the C-terminal PDZ domain directly antagonizes the 20S CP-Rpt5 interaction by capping the C-terminal tail of Rpt5. Nas2 thus operates as a proteasome activation blocker, offering a checkpoint during 19S base assembly process prior to its docking onto the proteolytic 20S CP. Structure 2014 22, 731-743DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2014.02.014) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions