Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Advertisements

Michiko Tashiro, Hana Inoue, Masato Konishi  Biophysical Journal 
Temperature Control Methods in a Laser Tweezers System
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Indrajeet Singh, Efrosyni Themistou, Lionel Porcar, Sriram Neelamegham 
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Santosh K. Dasika, Kalyan C. Vinnakota, Daniel A. Beard 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Jérôme Lang, Amandine Maréchal, Manon Couture, Jérôme Santolini 
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Michael J. Reddish, Robert Callender, R. Brian Dyer 
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Macromolecular Crowding Modulates Actomyosin Kinetics
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Shu-Chun Cheng, Gu-Gang Chang, Chi-Yuan Chou  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Calmodulin Modulates Initiation but Not Termination of Spontaneous Ca2+ Sparks in Frog Skeletal Muscle  George G. Rodney, Martin F. Schneider  Biophysical.
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Variable-Field Analytical Ultracentrifugation: I
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Ave Minajeva, Michael Kulke, Julio M. Fernandez, Wolfgang A. Linke 
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Ca2+ Regulation of Gelsolin Activity: Binding and Severing of F-actin
Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis of the Light-induced Processes in Plant and Cyanobacterial Phytochromes  Igor Chizhov, Björn Zorn, Dietmar J. Manstein,
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Wei Zhang, John S. Olson, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Malin Persson, Elina Bengtsson, Lasse ten Siethoff, Alf Månsson 
Torque Transmission Mechanism via DELSEED Loop of F1-ATPase
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages 2805-2814 (December 2017) Two Distinct Fluorescence States of the Ligand-Induced Green Fluorescent Protein UnaG  Yoh Shitashima, Togo Shimozawa, Akiko Kumagai, Atsushi Miyawaki, Toru Asahi  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages 2805-2814 (December 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two distinct rates in the FI time courses upon the mixing of UnaG and BR. (A) FI time courses after mixing UnaG and BR. BR was added to apoUnaG solution (1:1 BR/UnaG) at various concentrations (in ascending order, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 μM in final concentration) at 0 s. (B) Plot of the FI amplitude increases in the rapid phase (FI0) versus the UnaG concentrations in the solution. (C) Normalized FI time courses in the slow phase displayed in (A) (black dots) with fitting curves achieved using Eq. 1 (gray lines). The time courses were normalized by the respective FI0 and are presented with each 0.5 increment on the vertical axis for visibility. (D) Plot of the time constants and amplitudes of FI enhancement obtained from the fitting analysis in (C). The time constants (open circles, left axis) and the amplitudes (open squares, right axis) had no dependence on UnaG concentrations and were determined to be k = 4.34 × 10−3 ± 0.18 s−1 and A = 0.78 ± 0.02 on average. Each curve presented in (A) and (C) is a typical curve selected from four independent experiments at each UnaG concentration. Data are averages from four independent experiments, and error bars in (B) and (D) indicate standard deviations. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Analytical ultracentrifugation of apoUnaG and/or holoUnaG. (A) (Top) Sedimentation velocity absorbance profiles of an equimolar mixture of apoUnaG and holoUnaG (7.5 μM each) in K-Pi buffer (colored dots; higher color temperature indicates later time points) with fitting curves (black lines), using c(s) values as parameters with SEDFIT software. (Bottom) Residuals of the fittings in the top plot. The absorbance profiles were obtained at 55 K Rpm and 20°C, and were collected every 6 min for 300 min. Scans presented here are every 24 min for clarity. The fitting analysis was performed with a grid resolution of 200 for 0.5–15 S. (B) The c(s) as a result of the fitting analysis in graph (A). (Inset) The detailed c(s) obtained by limiting the range of c(s) to 1.0–2.5 S with a grid resolution of 200. Both c(s) curves showed a single peak without a shoulder. (C and D) (Top) Sedimentation equilibrium absorbance profiles for various concentrations of apoUnaG (C) and holoUnaG (D) (colored circles; blue, 9.4 μM; yellow, 5.6 μM; and red, 3.8 μM), and the fitting curves (black lines) that are analyzed globally by a nonlinear least-squares method. (Bottom) Residuals of the fittings in the top plots. The absorbance profiles were obtained at 25 K Rpm and 20°C. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Proposed schema of the UnaG and BR complex system. The holoUnaG1 was initially formed by the binding of apoUnaG and BR. Then, by a reversible intra-molecular reaction, holoUnaG1 changed to holoUnaG2 and brightness increased by a factor of 3.9. The apoUnaG, holoUnaG1, and holoUnaG2 finally reached a state of equilibrium. The BR dissociation pathways for holoUnaG1 and holoUnaG2 are indicated by dashed arrows, because 1) at least either koff1 or koff2 was not 0, and 2) the unique values of koff1 and koff2 could not be determined (for details, see main text). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spectroscopic studies to probe the change in bound BR. (A) The excitation and fluorescence spectra of 1 μM holoUnaG (both UnaG and BR concentrations were 1 μM) at 0 and 10 min from the start of the slow phase (black and red lines, respectively). Each spectrum was normalized by its own FI maximum. (Inset) The spectra normalized by the FI maxima at 0 min. (B) The CD (top) and absorbance (bottom) spectra of 1 μM holoUnaG are presented in colors corresponding to those in (A) (UnaG and BR concentrations were 1 and 5 μM, respectively; the condition was set for excess BR in solution to prevent BR dissociation for measurements over a long time period). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The association rate constant of UnaG and BR. (A) The FI time courses upon addition of various concentrations of BR (5, 10, and 20 nM in final concentration) to apoUnaG solutions (50 nM fixed concentration). The total concentrations of BR and UnaG in final concentration are denoted by [BR]0 and [apoUnaG]0, respectively. (Inset) The FI time courses focused on the very initial phase and the fitting lines are shown (in order, from the bottom, [BR]0 = 5, 10, and 20 nM). The right axis shows the concentration of holoUnaG1corresponding to the raw FI value. The method for converting the raw FI value to holoUnaG1 concentration is described in the main text. (B) Plot of the initial velocities of holoUnaG1 generation (Vinit) versus [BR]0 (open circles) and the linear regression line (dashed gray line). The association rate constant (kon) was obtained from the slope of this plot (kon = 7.05 × 106 M−1 s−1). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dissociation rate constants of UnaG and BR. Shown is the FI time course upon addition of 80× excess N57A (weak-fluorescent mutant) apoUnaG to the WT holoUnaGs solution at the equilibrium state (open circles) and the fitting curve (gray line). The FI decay was well fitted with a single-exponential function with a time constant of 2.17 × 10−4 s−1. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 2805-2814DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.022) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions