NAC Meeting April Calgary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coagulopathy and blood component transfusion in trauma
Advertisements

Basic coagulation techniques and Quality control issues
Nursing 210 Fluid and Cells Nursing management of patients with hematologic dysfunction Laurie Brown RN, MSN, MPA-HA, CCRN.
Massive transfusion: New Protocol
Blood Components Dosage And Their Administration
Severe Sepsis Initial recognition and resuscitation
INDICATIONS FOR EMERGENT TRANSFUSIONS Manjushree Matadial DO Saint Joseph Hospital and Medical Center, April 27,2009.
BLOOD BANKING 1- BLOOD PRODUCTS 2- AUTOLOGOUS TRANSFUSION M. H. Shaheen Maadi Armed Forces Hospital.
Leanna R. Miller, RN, MN, CCRN-CSC, PCCN-CMC, CNRN, CEN, NP Education Specialist LRM Consulting Nashville, TN.
D - DEATH I - IS C - COMING DIC is an important contributor to maternal mortality and morbidity.
Definition of Massive Transfusion Replacement of a blood volume equivalent within 24hr Transfusion>10 unit within 24 hr Transfusion > 4 units in 1 hr.
MTP Octaplex rFVIIa Calgary. Massive Transfusion Protocol.
Bleeding time,clotting time, PT, and PTT
Dr msaiem Acquired Coagulation Disorders Dr Mohammed Saiem Al-dahr KAAU Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences.
4th year medical students Blood Component Therapy Salwa I Hindawi MSc FRCPath CTM Director of Blood Transfusion Services KAUH. Jeddah.
Interactive Session on Clotting Profile Dr P T R Makuloluwa MBBS (Col), MD (Anaesthesiology), FRCA (Lond)
DIC Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Senior clinician Request: a o 4 units RBC o 2 units FFP Consider: a o 1 adult therapeutic dose platelets o tranexamic acid in trauma patients Include:
Hemostasis and Blood Coagulation
Background Methods Results Conclusion Acknowledgements Printed by Multi-Institutional Audit of octaplex® & Comparison with National Recommendations S.
Dr Ahmed abdulwahab. Hemorrhage is still one of the leading cause of maternal mortality all over the world DEFINITION Primary post partum hemorrhage.
CRYOPRECIPITATE USE IN 25 CANADIAN HOSPITALS: COMMONLY USED OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLISHED GUIDELINES Edward C Alport, Jeannie L Callum, Susan Nahirniak, Bernie.
MLAB 1227: Coagulation Keri Brophy-Martinez Coagulation Disorders: Secondary Hemostasis Part Two.
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. XIIa Coagulation cascade IIa Intrinsic system (surface contact ) XII XI XIa Tissue factor IX IXa VIIa VII VIIIVIIIa.
Lt Col T Woolley FRCA RAMC Surg Lt Cdr Catherine Doran MRCS PGCAES RN Surg Capt M Midwinter DipAppStats MD FRCS RN NATO Medical Conference Royal Centre.
The Clotting Cascade and DIC Karim Rafaat, MD. Coagulation Coagulation is a host defense system that maintains the integrity of the high pressure closed.
Hematology Blueprint PANCE Blueprint. Coagulation Disorders.
Platelet transfusion: Experience of the gastro-enterology departement Charles Nicolle Hospital BEN SAID M, SAID Y, BAHLOUL A, NAJJAR T, GUERMAZI S.
Iman Al-Obari, Ms Pharm; Abdulrazaq Al-Jazairi, PharmD; Iman Zaghloul, PhD; Mahasen Saleh, MD Ali Sanei, MD; Aabdulrahman Al Mousa, MD; Zuhair Al-Halees,
DIC. acute, subacute or chronic widespread intravascular fibrin formation in response to excessive blood protease activity that overcomes the natural.
Blood Transfusion Safe Practice.
Hemostasis and Coagulation Hemostasis Hemostasis is the maintenance of circulating blood in the liquid state and retention of blood in the vascular system.
Haemostasis. Indications for hemostasis test – Identify patients presenting with bleeding that have a correctable bleeding tendency – Identify patients.
1. Normal haemostasis Haemostasis is the process whereby haemorrhage following vascular injury is arrested. It depends on closely linked interaction.
Approach to the Bleeding Child. Evaluation  History Current Bleeding Medical Family  Physical exam  Selected laboratory investigations.
Transfusion Christine Sullivan Transfusion Practitioner.
Management Control or elimination of the underlying cause Severe DIC: – Control of hemodynamic parameters – Respiratory support – Surgery Attempts to treat.
Plasma and plasma components in the management of disseminated intravascular coagulation Marcel Levi* Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam,
Chapter 23. Bleeding disorders associated with coagulopathy
Bleeding Tendency Dr. Mervat Khorshied Ass. Prof. of Clinical and Chemical Pathology.
Obada Al-Eisa Saud Bashtawy Emad Mansour.  It is an acquired condition characterized by massive activation of the coagulation system.  It is always.
Yadegarynia, D. MD..
Approach To Bleeding Disorders In Neonates
MLAB Coagulation Keri Brophy-Martinez
Multiple choice questions
Immune thrombocytopenia purpura(ITP)
بنام خداوند.
K A U H Blood bank Wesaam Al-Sheyyab.
Rapid Reversal of Warfarin Therapy in Patients with Intracranial / Intraspinal Bleeding Mount Auburn Hospital Blood Bank, Emergency Department, Critical.
Warfarin Toxicity Treatment & Management
Evaluation of Four Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate
May 20, th European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative Joint Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends.
Constituents of the blood: Platelets and plasma
Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation
Discounted Coagulation Profiles Clinical Laboratories.
Update from AB – Calgary Zone
NAC meeting November 6-7, 2014.
Alberta Health Services
PROPPR Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma. 
M. Taher Shabani-Rad Susan Nahirniak NAC Meeting Nov Toronto
NAC meeting April 30-May 1, 2014.
Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients ISHLT 2010
Nova Scotia Update NAC Meeting October 15-16, 2015.
Brian Muirhead FRCPC Assistant Professor, University of Manitoba
NAC Meeting Edmonton April 2016
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF MASSIVE TRANSFUSION PRACTICE IN NON-TRAUMA RELATED HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE Dr. Gayathri.A.M, Dr.S.Sathyabhama,
Blood Components Dosage And Their Administration
Presentation transcript:

NAC Meeting April 2018 - Calgary FC (RiaSTAP) vs Cryo M. Taher Shabani-Rad Susan Nahirniak Brian Muirhead NAC Meeting April 2018 - Calgary

Objectives Evaluation of Fibrinogen increment after infusion of low dose RiaSTAP (1 gr) vs high dose (2 gr) Is Cryo replaceable by RiaSTAP? Development of dose recommendation based on clinical indications/companion Lab tests (Pending) The Cost Impact of Cryo replacement by RiaSTAP

Methodology An observation Study following implementation of FC protocol Collecting retrospective clinical data of all cases with administration of FC (RiaSTAP) (2016 and 2017) that pre and post FC administration fibrinogen levels (up to 6 hours) were available. Patients were categorized based on administered FC doses (1 gr, 2 gr and > 2gr) and underlying clinical indications (Bleeding, DIC, isolated hypofibrinogenemia or multi-factorial (>2 factors)) to calculate the delta-Fib (Post-FC fibrinogen minus Pre-FC fibrinogen) to evaluate the fibrinogen increment for each category.

with bleeding or significant drop in Fib levels within last 6h Fibrinogen Level* No Fibrinogen level is available 1.0 - 1.49 g/L with bleeding or significant drop in Fib levels within last 6h 0.5 - 1.0 g/L Less than 0.5 g/L FC (RiaSTAP®) Dosing **LT Bleeding 1 gram (1 vial) Request collection for Fib levels prior to infusion and post-infusion Fib levels Further vials requires Fibrinogen Level Cardiac surgery pts 2 grams (2 vial) initially, Request collection for Pre-infusion and post-infusion Fib levels 2 grams (2 vial) All other patients Request collection for post-infusion Fib levels *Non-LT Bleeding LT Bleeding 1 gram (1 vial) if ≤ one MTP or 6RCs transfused. 2 grams (2 vials) if > one MTP or 10RCs transfused. 2 grams initially, 2nd dose of 2 grams may be released without further Fib results if clinically indicated 2 gram (2 vials), Request collection for post-infusion Fib levels 4 grams (4 vials) , Further doses require post-infusion fibrinogen results Notes: *Only pts with Fib. <1.5g/L are eligible for FC/Cryo **LT = life threatening Fib/FC = fibrinogen concentrate

Factor Levels of patients requiring Cryopercipitate/RiaSTAP (28 Pts) Question: Which bleeding patients require Cryo vs RiaSTAP? Patients with isolated Fibrinogen deficiency may require RiaSTAP Patients with combined factor deficiency may require Cryo-Percipitate Normal Elevated Low Total Fibrinogen 3 25 28 VWF 6 21 27 Factor VIII 12 11 5 Factor XIII Not measured

Pre and Post infusion Feb Levels- CZ Based on RiaSTAP (1 gr vs 2 gr vs 4gr) CLS-CZ # Pts # Pts (RSTP 1gr) # Pts (RSTP 2gr) # Pts (RSTP ≥4gr) Pre Fib >1.5 57 (27%) 32 (25%) 23 (28%) 2 (18%) Pre Fib <1.5 156 (73%) 98 (75%) 59 (72%) 9 (82%) Total # of Patients 213 130 82 11 Post Fib <1.5 88 (41%) 62 (48%) 22 (27%) 4 (36%) Post Fib >1.5 125 (59%) 68 (53%) 50 (73%) 7 (64%)

Categorization of Pts Based on Underlying Coagulopathic Conditions at The Time of Fib Administration Patients with concurrent transfusion of Red Cells (>2 RCs within 12 hrs pre&post FC), Platelet>80,000 & PT/INR<1.2 or patients received =>1 MTP categorized as Active Bleeding patients (with or without Lab results). Patients with abnormal coagulation profile [elevated INR, PTT & recent thrombocytopenia (<100,000) and elevated D-Dimer>3mg/L) or reconfirmed clinical diagnosis of DIC but transfusion of <3 RC units (within 12 hrs pre&post FC) included in DIC group. Cases with low fibrinogen, Platelet>100,000, D-Dimer<3mg/L & transfusion of <3 RC units were included in isolated hypofibrinogenemia group. The rest of cases were included within multi-factorial group.

Categorization of Pts Based on Underlying Coagulopathic Conditions at The Time of Fib Administration A-BL MF DIC IHF Fibrinogen dose Active Bleeding DIC Isolated Hypofib Multi-Factorial Total 1g 75 18 10 27 130 2g 61 6 1 4 72

Four main categories of Fib utilization Active Bleeding Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) Multi-factorial Isolated Hypofibrigenemia Trauma Leukemia/ Lymphoma Liver failure Familial Cardiac Surgery Leukemia Solid tumor ; Pancreas Ca Drug Overdose Obstetric Chemotherapy Renal Failure Multi organ Failure Ruptured Aorta

Pts Received Low Dose FC (1 gr) Clinical Categories & Diagnosis (Death:18Pts) Active Bleeding #N DIC Isolated Hypo Fib Multi-Factorial PPH 3 Liver Failure 4 2 17 Poly Trauma 14 Pregnancy Cardiac surgery 1 11 Hematology Malignancy Hematological Malignancy 6 Cardiac Surgery GI bleeding 7 Dialysis/RF Congenital Vascular Surgery Drug User Multi-organ failure 23 Solid Tumor Chronic RF Septic shock Sx/Ortho/ Urol N/A Total (130 Pts) 75 18 10 27

Pts Received High Dose FC (2 gr) Clinical Categories & Diagnosis (Death:6 Pts) Active Bleeding #N DIC Isolated Hypo Fib Multi-Factorial Poly Trauma 4 Liver F 1 Solid Tumor Pregnancy 3 pregnancy PPH 2 GI bleeding Cardiac Surgery multi organ failure 34 Multiorgan Failure Vascular 18 Septic Shock Hip replacement Total (72 Pts) 61 6

Pts Received FC (1 gr vs. 2gr) Active Bleeding Pts (75 pts vs. 61) Two- Way ANOVA for Delta-Fib between bleeding subgroups (LD;1gr vs.  HD;2 gr) [p value =0.024] FC provides a better increment among pts with Pre-FIB<1.0gr/L but not for pts with Pre-FIB>1.5  

Pts Received Low Dose FC (1 gr) Clinical Categories & Diagnosis (Death:18Pts) Active Bleeding #N DIC Isolated Hypo Fib Multi-Factorial PPH 3 Liver Failure 4 2 17 Poly Trauma 14 Pregnancy Cardiac surgery 1 11 Hematology Malignancy Hematological Malignancy 6 Cardiac Surgery GI bleeding 7 Dialysis/RF Congenital Vascular Surgery Drug User Multi-organ failure 23 Solid Tumor Chronic RF Septic shock Sx/Ortho/ Urol N/A Total (130 Pts) 75 18 10 27

Pre-Fib vs Post-FC Delta Fib Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib All Pts Received Low Dose FC (1 gr) Excluding Cardiac Sx/PPH (102/130 Pts) Pre-Fib vs Post-FC Delta Fib r=−0.6833 Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib r=0.5448

Pts Received Low Dose FC (1 gr) Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Delta-Fib/Post-FC Fib Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L (Excluding PPH/Cardiac SX) Low Dose Group (1gr FC) #Pts / Category Delta<0.5 gr/L Delta 0.5-0.99 gr/L Delta>1.0 gr/L Post-Fib≥ 1.5 gr/L Ave Post-Fib>1.5 gr/L Pre-Fib ≤0.5 3 2 1 1.95 Pre-Fib 0.51-0.99 20 6 14 10 1.67 1.0-1.49 19 5 12 17 1.69  Total cases 42 11 28 4 29 1.7 Percentage NA 25% 66% 9% 69%

Pre-Fib vs Post-FC Delta Fib Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib Pts Received Low Dose FC (1 gr) Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L Excluding Cardiac Sx/PPH (42 Pts) Pre-Fib vs Post-FC Delta Fib r=−0.3004 Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib r=0.4063

Pts Received High Dose FC Clinical Categories & Diagnosis (Death:6 Pts) Active Bleeding #N DIC Isolated Hypo Fib Multi-Factorial Poly Trauma 4 Liver F 1 Solid Tumor Pregnancy 3 pregnancy PPH 2 GI bleeding Cardiac Surgery multi organ failure 34 Multiorgan Failure Vascular 18 Septic Shock Hip replacement Total Pts 61 6

All Pts Received High Dose FC (2gr) Excluding Cardiac Sx/PPH (34 Pts) Pre-Fib vs Post-Delta Fib r=−0.5974 Pre-Fib vs Post-Fib r=0.2026

Pts Received High Dose FC (2 gr) Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Delta-Fib/Post-FC Fib Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L (Excluding PPH/Cardiac SX) High Dose (2gr FC) #Pts / Category Delta <0.5 gr/L 0.5-0.99 gr/L >1.0 gr/L Post-Fib≥ 1.5 gr/L Ave Post-Fib>1.5 gr/L Pre-Fib≤0.5 7 2 1 4 2.15 Pre-Fib 0.51-0.99 16 9 3 2.10 1.0-1.49 26 14 10 17  Total cases 49 20 11 28 Percentage NA 41% 9% 57%  NA

Pre-Fib vs Post-Delta Fib All Pts Received High Dose FC (2gr) Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L (49 Pts) Pre-Fib vs Post-Delta Fib r=−0.2156 Pre-Fib vs Post-Fib r=0.2341

Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib (1 Gram) Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib (2 Gram) All Pts Received FC (1 gr vs. 2gr) Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L Excluding Cardiac Sx/PPH Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib (1 Gram) r=0.5448 Pre-FC Fib vs Post-FC Fib (2 Gram) r=0.2026

Ave PostFC-Fib>1.5 gr/L Post-FC Fib - High Dose(2 g) vs.Low Dose(1 g) Pts with Pre-Fib <1.5 gr/L No significant Difference between groups (P value; 0.26) High Dose (2gr FC) Post-Fib≥ 1.5 gr/L Ave PostFC-Fib>1.5 gr/L Low Dose (1gr FC) Ave Post-Fib>1.5 gr/L Pre-Fib≤0.5 4 2.15 Pre-Fib ≤0.5 2 1.95 Pre-Fib 0.51-0.99 7 2.10 10 1.67 1.0-1.49 17 1.69  Total cases 28/49 29/42 1.7 Percentage 57%  NA 69% NA

Summary Active bleeding patients with LD Fibrinogen concentrate achieve adequate increment There is no statistical significant difference between LD & HD FC to achieve post-FC target Fib level of >1.5 gr/L Patient with Pre-Fib of >1.5 did not show significant Fib increment by LD or HD FC Addition of D-Dimer to coagulation assessment of bleeding patient may help better categorization of pts who are qualified for HD FC

Acknowledgement Sima Zolfaghari Deanna Dilabough Heather Holly Schack Dr Dave Sidu Dr Leland Baskin Joanna McCarthy Julia Hendry

Appendix

Correlation Coefficient r Exactly –1. A perfect downhill (negative) linear relationship –0.70. A strong downhill (negative) linear relationship –0.50. A moderate downhill (negative) relationship –0.30. A weak downhill (negative) linear relationship 0. No linear relationship +0.30. A weak uphill (positive) linear relationship +0.50. A moderate uphill (positive) relationship +0.70. A strong uphill (positive) linear relationship Exactly +1. A perfect uphill (positive) linear relationship

D-Dimer In adult patients with a clinically low pretest probability (Wells score) of developing DVT, a negative D-dimer test result yields a 99% negative predictive value (NPV) in patients aged 60-80 years but only a 21%-31% NPV in patients older than 80 years In pregnant patients, a negative D-dimer test results has a NPV of 100%.

Main Features of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Series of 118 Patients Affected Patients, % Bleeding 64% Renal dysfunction 25% Hepatic dysfunction 19% Respiratory dysfunction 16% Shock 14% Central nervous system dysfunction 2%

Diagnosis of DIC Moderate or Marked Thrombocytopenia Down Trend Platelet count aPTT and PT (Not INR) are typically prolonged (50%). Fibrinogen (28% show Hypo Fib) D-Dimer (80-90% Sensitivity) Normal Range <0.45 mg/L (for Exclusion TE) All ages > 3.0 mg/L High D-Dimer> 10 mg/L

DIC Scoring System Score≥5  91-93% Sensitivity & 97-98% specificity International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)

JAMM DIC Score (Score≥ 4  DIC) Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) Platelet count (within 24 hours) < 80 or >50 % decline  (3) >80 and < 120 or >30% decline  (1) >120  (0) PT/INR >1.2 (1) <1.2  (0) Fibrin/FDPs (mg/L) >25  (3) 10-25  (1) <10  (0)

D-Dimer Level

Fibrinogen Levels - Pregnancy