SH3-SH2 Domain Orientation in Src Kinases

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Wenqing Xu, Amish Doshi, Ming Lei, Michael J Eck, Stephen C Harrison 
Bin Li, Darwin O.V Alonso, Valerie Daggett  Structure 
Structural Basis of Caspase Inhibition by XIAP
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Not your average density
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Accommodating Protein Dynamics in the Modeling of Chemical Crosslinks
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Monica Berrondo, Marc Ostermeier, Jeffrey J. Gray  Structure 
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Intrinsic Bending and Structural Rearrangement of Tubulin Dimer: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Coarse-Grained Analysis  Yeshitila Gebremichael, Jhih-Wei.
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Molecular Interactions of Alzheimer's Biomarker FDDNP with Aβ Peptide
The Dynamic Basis for Signal Propagation in Human Pin1-WW
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis for the Autoinhibition of c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

SH3-SH2 Domain Orientation in Src Kinases Tobias S Ulmer, Jörn M Werner, Iain D Campbell  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 901-911 (July 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5

Figure 1 Cartoon Representation of Human c-Src Kinase in the Assembled, Inactive State In the assembled inactive Src state, SH3 binds to the SH2-kinase domain connector (yellow), and SH2 binds to the phosphorylated kinase domain tail (Y527; orange). The SH3-SH2 linker is shown in red. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)

Figure 2 Absolute 1H and 15N Chemical Shift Differences between Free FynSH32 and FynSH32 Bound to Peptide Ligands (A) Chemical shifts for residues 84–145 (the SH3 domain plus linker) of FynSH32 are compared with residues 84–145 of FynSH32*SM1 (black columns) and of FynSH32*HMTA (gray columns). (B) Chemical shifts for residues 142–246 (the linker plus SH2 domain) of FynSH32*HMTA are compared with residues 142–246 of FynSH32*HMTA*FAK3A. Chemical shift changes of the domains to which the peptides bind directly are not shown. Linker residues S143 and A146–E148 could not be observed, probably due to rapid 1H solvent chemical exchange at pH 7.0. The other gaps are due to signal overlap or rapid solvent exchange of the corresponding 1H nuclei. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)

Figure 3 Chemical Shift Changes Propagated between SH3 and SH2 of FynSH32 upon Peptide Binding Mapped on the Crystal Structure of FynSH32 (B Form) Linker residues affected by peptide binding (D142 and I144) are shown in blue. Linker residues S143 and A146–E148, which could not be observed, are shown in yellow. Residues affected by peptide binding to the adjacent domain (L86, A139, W149, G152, Q225, and S246), revealing domain-linker contacts, are shown in green (S246 was not observable in the crystal structure; therefore, P245 was colored). In (A), V141, whose side chain packs against 1HN of L86, is shown in orange. In (B), Y150, whose aromatic ring faces 1HN of G152, is shown in orange. All other residues are shown in gray. The ligand binding regions of FynSH32 are highlighted in dark gray. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)

Figure 4 The 15N (T1/T2)−1 Ratios Used to Determine the Diffusion Tensor of SH3 and SH2 of Peptide-Bound FynSH32 (FynSH32*FAK3A*HMTA) The 15N (T1/T2)−1 ratio is sensitive to rotational diffusive motions of the 15N nucleus bearing molecule. Expressed more quantitatively, the (time-averaged) orientation of the H-N vector with respect to the rotational diffusion tensor determines the magnitude of 15N (T1/T2)−1. The angle θ describes the H-N vector orientation relative to the z axis of the tensor. The wide distribution of data points between sin2θ values of 0–1 shows a good representation of possible H-N orientations and indicates powerful restraints. For isotropic rotational diffusion (“a sphere”) all 15N (T1/T2)−1 ratios would be equal, independent of θ. For SH2 the linear increase in the 15N (T1/T2)−1 ratio with θ is consistent with molecular reorientation described by a prolate, axially symmetric diffusion tensor. The 15N (T1/T2)−1 ratios of SH3 exhibit similar features; however, at sin2θ values close to 1, which correspond to H-N vectors close to the x-y plane of the diffusion tensor, the ratios deviate from a straight line, reflecting different lengths of the x and y axes of the diffusion tensor. This is indicative of the fully anisotropic nature of the SH3 diffusion tensor. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)

Figure 5 Comparison of the Crystal Structures of FynSH32 and AblSH32 Cartoon representations of the crystal structures of (A) FynSH32 (B form) [10] and (B) AblSH32 [52]. SH2 domains, blue; SH3 domains, green; seven-residue linkers connecting SH3 and SH2, red (Fyn residues 142–148 and Abl residues 139–145). The regular secondary structure elements of both SH2 domains were superimposed (Cα rmsd 0.87 Å), showing distinctly different SH3 domain orientations with respect to the SH2 domain in the crystal structures. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)

Figure 6 Comparison of the SH3-SH2 Domain-Domain Orientation of Peptide-Bound FynSH32 in Solution with Free FynSH32 in the Crystal State and c-Src SH3-SH2 in the Assembled, Inactive c-Src State (A) Solution state representation of the domain-domain orientation of peptide-bound FynSH32 (red) in comparison with the crystal structure domain orientation of free FynSH32 (gray; B form). The SH2 domains have been superimposed. The crystal and solution state domain orientations, of SH3 relative to SH2, differ by an inclination of 35.0°. Cα of I144 was chosen as the origin of domain rotations (cyan), as it is known to be flexible in solution (see text). Note that no information about the relative SH3-SH2 domain twist could be obtained and is, therefore, shown in the same orientation as the crystal structure. (B) Solution state domain orientation of peptide-bound FynSH32 (red) compared to c-Src SH3-SH2 in the assembled, inactive c-Src state (green; Protein Data Bank entry 2src). The SH2 domains have been superimposed on their regular secondary structure elements (Cα rmsd 0.456 Å). It is evident that a large SH3-SH2 domain closure is required to bind to the kinase domain. For comparison the crystal structure of free FynSH32 (B form) is shown in gray. Structure 2002 10, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00781-5)