Lecture 5 Artificial Selection

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 8 Short-Term Selection Response
Advertisements

GENETICS AND VARIABILITY IN CROP PLANTS. Genetics and variability of traits are grouped by:  Qualitative traits Traits that show variability that can.
Qualitative and Quantitative traits
Population Genetics and Natural Selection
Chapter 7 Quantitative Genetics Read Chapter 7 sections 7.1 and 7.2. [You should read 7.3 and 7.4 to deepen your understanding of the topic, but I will.
The Inheritance of Complex Traits
Quantitative Genetics Theoretical justification Estimation of heritability –Family studies –Response to selection –Inbred strain comparisons Quantitative.
Lecture 5 Artificial Selection R = h 2 S. Applications of Artificial Selection Applications in agriculture and forestry Creation of model systems of human.
The infinitesimal model and its extensions. Selection (and drift) compromise predictions of selection response by changing allele frequencies and generating.
Quantitative Genetics
Extensions of the Breeder’s Equation: Permanent Versus Transient Response Response to selection on the variance.
Lecture 7: Correlated Characters
Short-Term Selection Response
Lecture 6: Inbreeding and Heterosis. Inbreeding Inbreeding = mating of related individuals Often results in a change in the mean of a trait Inbreeding.
Lecture 5 Short-Term Selection Response R = h 2 S.
Lecture 2: Basic Population and Quantitative Genetics.
ConceptS and Connections
Quantitative Genetics
Genetics and Speciation
Trait evolution Up until now, we focused on microevolution – the forces that change allele and genotype frequencies in a population This portion of the.
Quantitative Genetics. Continuous phenotypic variation within populations- not discrete characters Phenotypic variation due to both genetic and environmental.
Quantitative Genetics
Lecture 24: Quantitative Traits IV Date: 11/14/02  Sources of genetic variation additive dominance epistatic.
Lecture 21: Quantitative Traits I Date: 11/05/02  Review: covariance, regression, etc  Introduction to quantitative genetics.
24.1 Quantitative Characteristics Vary Continuously and Many Are Influenced by Alleles at Multiple Loci The Relationship Between Genotype and Phenotype.
IV. Variation in Quantitative Traits A. Quantitative Effects.
Quantitative Genetics as it Relates to Plant Breeding PLS 664 Spring 2011 D. Van Sanford.
Quantitative Genetics
Evolution in Populations (or How Natural Selection Works)
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
Measuring Evolutionary Change Over Time
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
PBG 650 Advanced Plant Breeding
Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium, Gene and Genotypic frequencies
Bio 508: Evolution Robert Page Slides Courtesy of Dr. Voss
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES
Genetics: Analysis and Principles
Quantitative and Behavior Genetics
Quantitative genetics
Quantitative Variation
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
Quantitative Traits in Populations
The Genetic Basis of Complex Inheritance
15 The Genetic Basis of Complex Inheritance
PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY & GENETIC ENGINEERING (3 CREDIT HOURS)
Genetics of qualitative and quantitative phenotypes
Washington State University
MULTIPLE GENES AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS
The ‘V’ in the Tajima D equation is:
Basic concepts on population genetics
Lecture 2: Fisher’s Variance Decomposition
Lecture 7: Correlated Characters
Lecture 2: Basic Population Genetics
Alternative hypotheses (i. e
Genetic Linkage.
Lecture 15: Analysis of Selection Experiments
Pi = Gi + Ei Pi = pi - p Gi = gi - g Ei = ei - e _ _ _ Phenotype
Washington State University
Lecture 13: Inbreeding and Heterosis
Lecture 14 Short-Termss Selection Response
Lecture 9: QTL Mapping II: Outbred Populations
Genotypic value is not transferred from parent to
Chapter 7 Beyond alleles: Quantitative Genetics
Heritability h2 = VA/Vp Proportion of total phenotypic variance attributed to variation in breeding values. Expresses the extent to which genes are transmitted.
Lecture 16: Selection on Multiple Traits lection, selection MAS
Introduction to Genetics
Heritability h2 = VA/Vp Proportion of total phenotypic variance attributed to variation in breeding values. Expresses the extent to which genes are transmitted.
MENDEL AND THE GENE IDEA Section A: Gregor Mendel’s Discoveries
Lecture 7: Correlated Characters
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 5 Artificial Selection R = h2 S

Applications of Artificial Selection Applications in agriculture and forestry Creation of model systems of human diseases and disorders Construction of genetically divergent lines for QTL mapping and gene expression (microarray) analysis Inferences about numbers of loci, effects and frequencies Evolutionary inferences: correlated characters, effects on fitness, long-term response, effect of mutations

Response to Selection Selection can change the distribution of phenotypes, and we typically measure this by changes in mean This is a within-generation change Selection can also change the distribution of breeding values This is the response to selection, the change in the trait in the next generation (the between-generation change)

The Selection Differential and the Response to Selection The selection differential S measures the within-generation change in the mean S = m* - m The response R is the between-generation change in the mean R(t) = m(t+1) - m(t)

Truncation selection uppermost fraction p chosen Within-generation change Between-generation change

The Breeders’ Equation: Translating S into R Recall the regression of offspring value on midparent value y O = π P + h 2 µ f m ° ∂ ( ) Averaging over the selected midparents, E[ (Pf + Pm)/2 ] = m*, E[ yo - m ] = h2 ( m* - m ) = h2 S Likewise, averaging over the regression gives Since E[ yo - m ] is the change in the offspring mean, it represents the response to selection, giving: R = h2 S The Breeders’ Equation

If males and females subjected to differing amounts of selection, Note that no matter how strong S, if h2 is small, the response is small S is a measure of selection, R the actual response. One can get lots of selection but no response If offspring are asexual clones of their parents, the breeders’ equation becomes R = H2 S If males and females subjected to differing amounts of selection, S = (Sf + Sm)/2 An Example: Selection on seed number in plants -- pollination (males) is random, so that S = Sf/2

Response over multiple generations Strictly speaking, the breeders’ equation only holds for predicting a single generation of response from an unselected base population Practically speaking, the breeders’ equation is usually pretty good for 5-10 generations The validity for an initial h2 predicting response over several generations depends on: The reliability of the initial h2 estimate Absence of environmental change between generations The absence of genetic change between the generation in which h2 was estimated and the generation in which selection is applied

The selection differential is a function of both the phenotypic variance and the fraction selected 20% selected Vp = 1, S = 1.4 50% selected Vp = 4, S = 1.6 20% selected Vp = 4, S = 2.8

The Selection Intensity, i As the previous example shows, populations with the same selection differential (S) may experience very different amounts of selection The selection intensity i provided a suitable measure for comparisons between populations, i = S p V P æ One important use of i is that for a normally-distributed trait under truncation selection, the fraction saved p determines i, i ' : 8 + 4 1 l n µ p ° ∂ ( )

Selection Intensity Versions of the Breeders’ Equation = h 2 S æ p i Expressed another way, R æ p = i h 2 Alternatively, R = i æ 2 A p

The Realized Heritability Since R = h2 S, this suggests h2 = R/S, so that the ratio of the observed response over the observed differential provides an estimate of the heritability, the realized heritability Obvious definition for a single generation of response. What about for multiple generations of response? Cumulative selection response = sum of all responses R C ( t = i 1 ) X

R ( t ) = h S + e b h = R ( T ) S P b = S ( ) R Cumulative selection differential = sum of the S’s S C ( t ) = 1 i X (1) The Ratio Estimator for realized heritability = total response/total differential, b h 2 r = R C ( T ) S (2) The Regression Estimator --- the slope of the Regression of cumulative response on cumulative differential P b = t S C ( ) R 2 Regression passes through the origin (R=0 when S=0). Slope = R C ( t ) = h 2 r S + e

Note x axis is differential, NOT generations Ratio estimator = 17.4/56.9 = 0.292 60 \ Cumulative Differential 5 10 15 20 Cumulative Response Slope = 0.270 = Regression estimator Note x axis is differential, NOT generations

Gene frequency changes under selection Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Fitnesses 1 1+s 1+2s Additive fitnesses Let q = freq(A2). The change in q from one generation of selection is: ¢ q = s ( 1 ° ) + 2 ' w h e n j < D In finite population, genetic drift can overpower selection. In particular, when 4 N e j s < 1 drift overpowers the effects of selection

Strength of selection on a QTL Have to translate from the effects on a trait under selection to fitnesses on an underlying locus (or QTL) Suppose the contributions to the trait are additive: Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Contribution to Character a 2a For a trait under selection (with intensity i) and phenotypic variance sP2, the induced fitnesses are additive with s = i (a /sP ) Thus, drift overpowers selection on the QTL when 4 N e j s = a i æ P < 1

D ¢ q ' 2 ( 1 ° ) [ + h ] More generally Change in allele frequency: Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 Contribution to trait a(1+k) 2a Fitness 1 1+s(1+h) 1+2s Change in allele frequency: D ¢ q ' 2 ( 1 ° ) [ + h ] s = i (a /sP ) Selection coefficients for a QTL h = k

Changes in the Variance under Selection The infinitesimal model --- each locus has a very small effect on the trait. Under the infinitesimal, require many generations for significant change in allele frequencies However, can have significant change in genetic variances due to selection creating linkage disequilibrium With positive linkage disequilibrium, f(AB) > f(A)f(B), so that AB gametes are more frequent With negativve linkage disequilibrium, f(AB) < f(A)f(B), so that AB gametes are less frequent Under linkage equilibrium, freq(AB gamete) = freq(A)freq(B)

± æ = ° V ( 1 ) = + d V ( 1 ) = + d d = æ ° h ± Changes in VA with disequilibrium Starting from an unselected base population, a single generation of selection generates a disequilibrium contribution d to the additive variance Under the infinitesimal model, disequilibrium only changes the additive variance. Additive genetic variance after one generation of selection Additive genetic variance in the unselected base population. Often called the additive genic variance disequilibrium V A ( 1 ) = a + d Changes in VA changes the phenotypic variance V P ( 1 ) = A + D E d h 2 ( 1 ) = V A P a + d d = æ 2 O ° P h 4 ± z The amount diseqilibrium generated by a single generation of selection is Changes in VA and VP change the heritability Within-generation change in the variance A decrease in the variance generates d < 0 and hence negative disequilibrium An increase in the variance generates d > 0 and hence positive disequilibrium ± æ 2 z = ° *

A “Breeders’ Equation” for Changes in Variance d(0) = 0 (starting with an unselected base population) Within-generation change in the variance -- akin to S New disequilibrium generated by selection that is passed onto the sext generation h 2 ( t ) = V A P a + d Decay in previous disequilibrium from recombination d(t+1) - d(t) measures the response in selection on the variance (akin to R measuring the mean) d ( t + 1 ) = 2 h 4 ± æ z æ 2 z ( t ) = 1 ° k Many forms of selection (e.g., truncation) satisfy k > 0. Within-generation reduction in variance. negative disequilibrium, d < 0 k < 0. Within-generation increase in variance. positive disequilibrium, d > 0 d ( t + 1 ) = 2 ° k h 4 æ z