Status of TRANSP and PTRANSP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Advertisements

EXTENDED MHD SIMULATIONS: VISION AND STATUS D. D. Schnack and the NIMROD and M3D Teams Center for Extended Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling PSACI/SciDAC.
Korean Modeling Effort : C2 Code J.M. Park NFRC/ORNL In collaboration with Sun Hee Kim, Ki Min Kim, Hyun-Sun Han, Sang Hee Hong Seoul National University.
Nov. 17, 2008D. McCune1 Status of TRANSP and PTRANSP Presented at APS-DPP 2008, Nov , 2008 *Supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-76CH03073.
Momentum transport and flow shear suppression of turbulence in tokamaks Michael Barnes University of Oxford Culham Centre for Fusion Energy Michael Barnes.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
GTC Status: Physics Capabilities & Recent Applications Y. Xiao for GTC team UC Irvine.
Nov. 8, 2010D. McCune1 Status of TRANSP Presented at APS-DPP 2010, Nov , 2010 *Supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466.
Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.
TRANSP and Frameworks Presented by D. McCune at the Joint ORNL/IU Workshop on Computational Frameworks in Fusion, June 6, 2005.
Massively Parallel Magnetohydrodynamics on the Cray XT3 Joshua Breslau and Jin Chen Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Cray XT3 Technical Workshop Nashville,
The SWIM Fast MHD Campaign Presented by S. C. Jardin Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory P.O. Box 451 Princeton, NJ Simulation of Wave Interaction.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
D. McCune 1 Plasma State Representation XPLASMA – Tool for Representation of Equilibrium, Fields and Profiles Available at:
Presented by XGC: Gyrokinetic Particle Simulation of Edge Plasma CPES Team Physics and Applied Math Computational Science.
Study of transport simulation on RF heated and current driven EAST plasma Siye Ding Under instruction of Prof. Baonian Wan 12/09/2009.
6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Magnetic Fusion Plasmas Hyunsun Han, G. Park, Sumin Yi, and J.Y. Kim 3D MHD SIMULATIONS.
Kinetic Effects on the Linear and Nonlinear Stability Properties of Field- Reversed Configurations E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 APS DPP Meeting, October 2003.
Overview of MHD and extended MHD simulations of fusion plasmas Guo-Yong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey, USA Workshop on ITER.
Hybrid Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Instabilities in Toroidal Plasmas Guo-Yong Fu In collaboration with J. Breslau, J. Chen, E. Fredrickson,
Database structure for the European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force F. Imbeaux On behalf of the Data Coordination Project.
Integrated Modeling and Simulations of ITER Burning Plasma Scenarios C. E. Kessel, R. V. Budny, K. Indireshkumar, D. Meade Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
D. A. Gates, R. B. White NSTX Physics Meeting 1/19/03
The european ITM Task Force data structure F. Imbeaux.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
PTRANSP Predictive TRANSP Code Plans and Progress Presented by Glenn Bateman Lehigh University On behalf of the PTRANSP collaboration involving: General.
TRANSP users meeting Agenda 1.TRANSP development in 2010/2011, user’s suggestions to facilitate/accelerate TRANSP submissions. 2.TRANSP work:
TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,
RF codes for Transp Transp User Course 2014 Jim Conboy.
APS DPP 2006 October Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control of ECCD for NTM Stabilization L. Luo 1, J. Woodby 1, E. Schuster 1 F. D. Halpern 2, G.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Sept. 19, 2007D. McCune1 TRANSP and PTRANSP: Status and Plans Presented at JET/MAST TRANSP Users’ Meeting, Sept. 19, 2007.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
SLM 2/29/2000 WAH 13 Mar NBI Driven Neoclassical Effects W. A. Houlberg ORNL K.C. Shaing, J.D. Callen U. Wis-Madison NSTX Meeting 25 March 2002.
Nov. 2, 2009D. McCune1 Status of TRANSP and PTRANSP Presented at APS-DPP 2009, Nov. 2--6, 2009 *Supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466.
D. McCune 1 PTRANSP Predictive Upgrades for TRANSP.
Plasma State Component. Software Status Current Version: 1.001; no recent updates. Implemented as 3 libraries layered over the NTCC library set: xplasma,
Summary CDBM IMAGE meeting, 07 IMAGE SUMMARY IMAGE set up to provide a venue for discussion between the different Integrated Modelling (IM) activities.
Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
1 A Proposal for a SWIM Slow-MHD 3D Coupled Calculation of the Sawtooth Cycle in the Presence of Energetic Particles Josh Breslau Guo-Yong Fu S. C. Jardin.
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ROTATION AND MOMENTUM TRANSPORT SESSIONS 10th ITPA Transport Physics and CDBM TG Meetings Princeton.
Parallel coupling: problems arising in the context of magnetic fusion John R. Cary Professor, University of Colorado CEO, Tech-X Corporation.
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
LoDestro, ITPA CDBM, Lausanne, May 7--10, 2007 p 1 Corsica free-boundary scenario and controller studies for ITER 12th ITPA Confinement Database and Modelling.
NSTX Team Meeting - Physics Analysis September 25, 2003 C.K. Phillips and S. Kaye.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
1PAC-37, Plasma control algorithm development on NSTX-U using TRANSP, M.D. Boyer, 1/26/2016 Dan Boyer for the Integrated Scenarios science group Plasma.
Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
NSTX-U Waves & Energetic Particles Theory/Experiment Joint Research Topics Supported by Gary Taylor Mario Podestà Nikolai Gorelenkov NSTX-U NSTX-U Theory.
Resistive Modes in CDX-U J. Breslau, W. Park. S. Jardin, R. Kaita – PPPL D. Schnack, S. Kruger – SAIC APS-DPP Annual Meeting Albuquerque, NM October 30,
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Fast Ion Transport Options in TRANSP Presented at Energetic Particle SFG Meeting, PPPL June – D. McCune.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas
Presentation transcript:

Status of TRANSP and PTRANSP Presented at APS-DPP 2008, Nov. 17--21, 2008 *Supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-76CH03073 Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Abstract – BP6.0055 D. McCune, R. Andre, E. Feibush, K. Indireshkumar, C. Ludescher-Furth, L. Randerson, PPPL*, H. St. John, General Atomics, G. Bateman, F. Halpern, A. Kritz, Lehigh University, L. Lodestro, W. Meyer, D. Pearlstein, LLNL**– The PPPL TRANSP code suite is a set of tools for time dependent simulation of axisymmetric tokamak plasmas. While the code has historically been used primarily for analysis of experimental results, predictive modeling enhancements to TRANSP have been carried out under the PTRANSP project. TRANSP and PTRANSP are now both deployed as Fusion Grid services at PPPL, supporting an international user base. The status of TRANSP and PTRANSP code development, as well as trends in production use, are presented here. New and developing features, such as the solution of free boundary MHD equilibria, the use of advanced solvers for prediction of the evolution of plasma density, angular momentum, and temperature profiles, are emphasized. The status of MPI parallelizatoin of TRANSP components is described. A recent positive development has been the beneficial collaboration between TRANSP/ PTRANSP and SciDAC FSP prototype projects SWIM and FACETs, with code components being shared effectively across all of these efforts. *PPPL work performed under auspices of DOE contract DE-AC02-76CH03073 **LLNL work performed under auspices of DOE contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

TRANSP: Vision Statement Provide a comprehensive end-to-end modeling capability for magnetic confinement fusion energy experiments of today and tomorrow. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Traditional TRANSP: Overview Experiments (Asdex-U, C-Mod, DIII-D, ITER, JET, KSTAR, MAST, NSTX) MDS+ 20-50 signals {f(t), f(x,t)} Plasma position, Shape, Temperatures, Densities Field, Current, RF and Beam Injected Powers. Preliminary data Analysis and Preparation (largely automated) Diagnostic Hardware Pre- and Post-processing at the experimental site… MDS+ TRANSP Analysis*: Current diffusion, MHD equilibrium, fast ions, heating, current drive; power, particle and momentum balance. Experiment simulation Output Database ~1000-2000 signals {f(t), f(x,t)} Visualization Load Relational Databases Detailed (3d) time-slice physics simulations: GS2, ORBIT, M3D… *FusionGrid TRANSP on PPPL servers Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

PPPL TRANSP Run Production* Fusion Grid TRANSP *Not shown in graphic: independent run production at JET site (approximately 1000 runs); quasi-production use of development versions in PTRANSP project (estimated to be 100s of runs). Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

PPPL TRANSP SERVICE FY-2005 through FY-2008 *~3000 additional JET runs on JET production server. 12868 Total Runs Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

FY-2008 PPPL TRANSP Team Name TRANSP PTRANSP SciDAC Other Andre 80% 20% Kumar 65% 35% McCune 25% Feibush 60% Ludescher Randerson 40% Total FTE 3.1 0.55 0.75 1.6 Color code: Physics, Visualization, Engineering/ Operational Support Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

TRANSP Staffing Level Staff levels found to be insufficient: Cannot promptly meet code development requests of production users; Long term development projects have lagged. Main reason: production system support. 100s of crashed TRANSP runs per year, each requiring individual, detailed investigation. New hire in FY-2009: Marina Gorelenkova. Financed by experimental projects. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

TRANSP Development Plasma State Module (collaboration with SWIM SciDAC). MPI Parallelization of code components. NUBEAM Upgrades. Monte Carlo RF Operator. TORIC. GENRAY / CQL3D. User interfaces (ElVis; web services). Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

SciDAC Plasma State Module Standardized repository for tokamak simulation data: MHD Equilibrium Profiles Species Lists, etc. Used in PTRANSP, SWIM, FACETS. NUBEAM coupled. GENRAY in progress. Simulation Driver NBI module ECH/LH Module ICRF module Instance of Plasma State Control Channel Data Channel Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Common Coupling to NUBEAM Based on SWIM SciDAC Plasma State: call nubeam_ctrl_init(ps_in,init_ctrl,status) call nubeam_ctrl_step(ps_in,ps_out,step_ctrl,status) Plasma State objects: ps_in, ps_out. NUBEAM-specific control objects: init_ctrl, step_ctrl. integer return code: status. Interface used now by TRANSP. Expected to be used by SWIM & FACETs SciDAC projects. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Plasma State Provides Infrastructure for Module Coupling TRANSP now provides Plasma States for use by heating and current drive codes. GENRAY and CQL3D use this interface now in SWIM project. Plan to leverage this development to import GENRAY and CQL3D into TRANSP. Beneficial collaboration with SciDACs! Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

TRANSP MPI Parallelization Methods Investigated Client-Server: Single MPI server serves multiple serial clients: Advantage: shared use of MPI machines. Drawbacks: complexity, performance (file transport). MPI Subprocess Coupled by Plasma State: Advantage: simplicity, process level code sharing. Drawback: performance (use of file I/O); load balance*. Single MPI image: Advantage: MPI module performance (avoid file I/O). Drawback: interface / build complexity; load balance*. *MPI machines idle during execution of serial sections of TRANSP. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

NUBEAM Upgrades MPI Parallelization – BP6.0057 (Kumar) Planned: Diagnostic Simulation Upgrades: GC f(E,vpll/v,x,theta) based NPA simulator. 3d Halo Neutral Density. Investigations: Orbit averaging techniques (reduce variance in momentum sources and charge exchange loss model). Beam-resolved outputs & other requests… Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

MPI for more Particles, Better Statistics in Distribution Functions 10K particles 100K particles Plots provided by MAST Team Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Monte Carlo RF Operator in NUBEAM Method based on TORIC wave fields was investigated by visiting Post Doc last year. Model was able to couple power to MC fast ion population. Statistics: MPI absolutely required. Post Doc (Dr. Jae-Min Kwon) returned to Korea. We don’t have the staff to pursue this… Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

TORIC Full Wave ICRF Code Collaboration with CMod, JET, NSTX, and TORIC authors at IPP/Garching. TRANSP now coupled to IPP/Garching TORIC svn repository; up-to-date TORIC version now available in TRANSP. Plasma State upgrade– HHFW TORIC can now be run: Support NSTX experiments Permit scenarios other than minority heating. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

GENRAY/CQL3D Coupling Plasma State interface built for standalone GENRAY and CQL3D operation. Effort by B. Harvey supported by PPPL TRANSP team as part of SWIM SciDAC Collaboration. Foundation Laid for coupling GENRAY and CQL3D into TRANSP. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Development of User Interfaces Web-based NSTX Between Shots Analysis user interface. Prototypes for time-slice post-analysis: Linear stability: Balloon, Pest, Nova-K. Turbulent transport: GTS Methods based on extraction of TRANSP time slices as Plasma States; MHD equilibrium refinement by JSolver. Poster by E. Feibush: BP6.0054 Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Between Shots TRANSP Service Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

PTRANSP Developments: General Atomics, Lehigh U., LLNL, PPPL Production Use. MHD Equilibrium Solvers: Free Boundary Solutions; rotation pressure modification. Coupled Poloidal Field Diffusion: NTCC module under development by LLNL. Transport Equation Solvers: Density Prediction. Incorporation of TGLF Transport Model. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

PTRANSP Production Use 263 Full Discharge ITER PTRANSP Simulations In FY-2008. Accounted for nearly 60% of cpu-time usage of entire PPPL TRANSP service. PTRANSP-based Publications: Four ITER papers in FY-2007 and FY-2008. Four more currently in preparation. IAEA validation study using JET, DIII-D data. Authors: R. Budny, G. Bateman, F. Halpern, A. Kritz (PPPL / Lehigh University collaboration). Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

PTRANSP Implementation of TEQ Free Boundary Solver– see BP6 PTRANSP Implementation of TEQ Free Boundary Solver– see BP6.056 (Andre). Limiter TRANSP/PTRANSP has successfully been using the TEQ fixed boundary solver for over two years. Reasonably robust and very accurate Has become the preferred fixed boundary solver The TEQ free boundary solver is invoked over the fixed solver by a single namelist change. NTEQ_MODE=102 causes <J.B> to be used in a free boundary solution when TEQ (LEVGEO=11) is being used. The prescribed boundary given as input to PTRANSP is used to select fuzzy boundary points for TEQ. The coil currents are constrained in a least squares manner so that the plasma boundary lies on the fuzzy boundary points. To startup the run an existing free boundary solution of the tokamak is read into TEQ and perturbed through multiple invocations of TEQ to the starting conditions of the shot. A q mode free boundary solution will be made available after further development of the magnetic field diffusion in PTRANSP. An alternate free boundary solution is available in TRANSP through the PPPL ISolver code. This has been used to test the effects related to plasma toroidal rotation. Coil Plasma Fuzzy Boundary Point X point Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

LLNL Report: RMHD (Resistive MHD Code) Coupling TEQ & Bpol Diffusion. 1D transport (C++) and its connection logic to F90. Includes the diffusion equations’ numerical coef.’s and sources; and 1D solver. Corsica F90 source (tor.f90) Provides the transformations btw the equilibrium coordinates (poloidal flux) and the independent transport coordinate. Logic to obtain the conductivity and bootstrap current using either neoHS (LLNL) or NCLASS (NTC). Corsica run-time scripts --> transStep.f90 Provides time step logic, restart capability, and time history of selected variables. In addition, contains the circuit-equation logic. Work in Progress: Parts 1 and 2 are complete. Part 3 remains. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

New PTRANSP Features Added by Lehigh Group - 1 Expanded choice of theory-based transport models: New MMM08 model for particle, momentum and thermal transport Posters BP6.00059 and BP6.00060 Monday morning by F.D. Halpern, A.H. Kritz, et al. GLF23 particle, momentum and thermal transport MMM95 particle and thermal transport NCLASS neoclassical particle and thermal transport as well as computation of radial electric field and neoclassical electrical resistivity Improved choice of predictive sawtooth oscillation models: Porcelli model for triggering sawtooth crashes and partial mixing Porcelli sawtooth trigger can also be used with older Kadomtsev sawtooth mixing model Park-Monticello model for triggering sawtooth crashes Prescribed sawtooth period Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

New PTRANSP Features Added by Lehigh Group - 2 Predictive transport modeling for density, momentum and temperature Unified system of predictive transport equations are advanced in time using consistent numerical algorithms and time-step control See poster BP6.00058 Monday morning by G. Bateman et al. Boundary conditions from predictive pedestal model or experimental data Can select subset of profiles to be obtained from experimental data Gas puffing feedback loop implemented for predictive particle transport Controls average electron density with prescribed Zeff profile vs time Implemented choice of techniques in the new combined system of transport equations to control numerical problems : Pereverzev-Corrigan numerical technique provides fast, simple control see Comput. Phys. Comm. 179 (2008) 579 Tends to slow down transient behavior Newton’s method, see Jardin et al., J. Comp. Phys. 227 (2008) 8769 More computational effort than the Pereverzev-Corrigan method, but Newton’s method can provide improved treatment of transient conditions Older time-averaging methods Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Access to TGLF via GCNMP (General Atomics) Holger St. John – poster TP6.0026 Will need to use TRANSP’s new Plasma State based MPI module coupling method. TGLF very computationally expensive! Ongoing PPPL/GA collaboration: Plasma State pairs define prediction problem. Human iterations needed to complete definition and agree on interface methods. Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune

Summary Important new capabilities– MPI, Free MHD Boundary, PTRANSP, NUBEAM Upgrades. Ambitious development program– more MPI, PTRANSP, access to SciDAC RF codes via Plasma State. Labor Constraint: budget << $25M/year! All fusion transport codes = FSP wannabes. Operation of production system delivers V&V of (P)TRANSP simulations to user community but imposes a heavy labor burden (FSP take note!). Nov. 17, 2008 D. McCune